From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: remove the IRQ ACK notifier assertions
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:26:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227867971-1716-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227867951.3643.24.camel@blaa>
We will obviously never pass a NULL struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier* to
this functions. They are always embedded in the assigned device
structure, so the assertion add nothing.
The irqchip_in_kernel() assertion is very out of place - clearly
this little abstraction needs to know nothing about the upper
layer details.
Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
---
virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
index 9fbbdea..973df99 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
@@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ void kvm_notify_acked_irq(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned gsi)
void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
{
- /* Must be called with in-kernel IRQ chip, otherwise it's nonsense */
- ASSERT(irqchip_in_kernel(kvm));
- ASSERT(kian);
hlist_add_head(&kian->link, &kvm->arch.irq_ack_notifier_list);
}
--
1.5.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-28 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-20 8:07 [PATCH 1/1] KVM: IRQ ACK notifier should be used with in-kernel irqchip Sheng Yang
2008-10-22 10:26 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-28 10:25 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-11-28 10:26 ` Mark McLoughlin [this message]
2008-11-28 10:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: make kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier() safe Mark McLoughlin
2008-11-28 10:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: gracefully handle zero in kvm_free_irq_source_id() Mark McLoughlin
2008-11-28 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: split out kvm_free_assigned_irq() Mark McLoughlin
2008-11-30 10:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: gracefully handle zero in kvm_free_irq_source_id() Avi Kivity
2008-12-01 13:56 ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-01 13:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: remove the IRQ ACK notifier assertions Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-01 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: make kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier() safe Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-01 13:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: don't fee an unallocated irq source id Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-01 13:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: add KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID assertions Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-01 13:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: split out kvm_free_assigned_irq() Mark McLoughlin
2008-12-02 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: add KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID assertions Avi Kivity
2008-12-02 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: remove the IRQ ACK notifier assertions Avi Kivity
2008-12-01 2:31 ` [PATCH 1/1] KVM: IRQ ACK notifier should be used with in-kernel irqchip Sheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1227867971-1716-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com \
--to=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.