From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>
To: "Högander Jouni" <jouni.hogander@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@deeprootsystems.com
Subject: Re: Bug in linux omap clock framework?
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:59:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228895990.31061.13.camel@tubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87prk0cwfy.fsf@trdhcp146196.ntc.nokia.com>
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:37 +0200, Högander Jouni wrote:
> "ext Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 02:24 -0700, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >> Hi Tomi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 16:51 -0700, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >> > > Hi Tomi,
> >> > >
> >> > > nice test case.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Tomi.Valkeinen@nokia.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I have had strange clk_enable() crashes with DSS2, and now I managed to
> >> > > > isolate it. With the included patch, on OMAP3 SDP board, with default
> >> > > > kernel config, I always get the crash below. In this example case it
> >> > > > happens at specific time on boot, but with DSS2 it happens randomly at
> >> > > > runtime, when I enable the DSS clocks.
> >> > >
> >>
> >> At this point my guess would be that it is a DSS driver problem, but I
> >> don't think it is clear yet.
> >>
> >
> > I don't know much about power and clock domains, but I believe I found
> > the reason and fix for this. At least this should point to the right
> > direction.
> >
> > It looks to me that when I do clk_enable() to a clock which is inside a
> > turned off powerdomain, clk_enable() function will return before the
> > powerdomain is fully turned on. Reading PM_PWSTST_DSS shows that the
> > powerdomain is still in transition state.
> >
> > The following change waits until the powerdomain has finished the
> > transition. At least it fixed the problem for me, and other things seem
> > to be still working =).
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
> > index fa62f14..f713d0b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c
> > @@ -567,6 +567,8 @@ int omap2_clkdm_clk_enable(struct clockdomain *clkdm, struct clk *clk)
> > else
> > omap2_clkdm_wakeup(clkdm);
> >
> > + pwrdm_wait_transition(clkdm->pwrdm.ptr);
> > +
>
> Altough this patch is fixing the problem, I'll guess it's because of
> delay it causes rather than waiting for
> PM_PWSTST_DSS. omap2_clkdm_clk_enable alone doesn't switch pwrdm to
> on. This is because clockdomain/powerdomains are controlled by HW (hw
> supervised).
>
> I think the right answer is to use ST_*_IDLE & ST_*_STDBY bits in
> omap2_clk_wait_ready.
But ST_DSS_IDLE says active only after both interface and functional
clock are on, so it doesn't help here.
Why is it wrong to wait for PM_PWSTST_DSS? Do you mean that this crash
is not caused by the DSS being not powered on, but by something else,
and so the small delay just accidentally fixes the problem?
Tomi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 14:49 Bug in linux omap clock framework? Tomi.Valkeinen
2008-12-05 18:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2008-12-08 7:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-06 23:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-08 8:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-08 9:24 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-08 9:36 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-09 13:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-09 23:14 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-10 3:04 ` Igor Stoppa
2008-12-10 7:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-10 7:37 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-10 7:59 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2008-12-10 8:44 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-10 8:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-10 10:44 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-10 11:53 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-11 9:19 ` Högander Jouni
2008-12-11 16:17 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-12-12 7:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2008-12-09 9:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228895990.31061.13.camel@tubuntu \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com \
--cc=jouni.hogander@nokia.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.