From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Max Waterman <davidmaxwaterman@fastmail.co.uk>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: upgrade advice
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229436950.22331.45.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812160807200.725@p34.internal.lan>
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 08:07 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Redeeman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 06:44 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Max Waterman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have a 8x200GB RAID5 array - 4 SATA and 4 EIDE. It has 2 spare, so
> >>> that's only 6 drives actually in the array, making 1TB of space (I
> >>> think that's right).
> >>>
> >>> The drives are quite old now, and people are asking what I want for
> >>> Christmas...so I'm wondering how to upgrade this setup. Clearly I
> >>> don't want to retire my existing drives prematurely, since they've
> >>> shown no sign of problem.
> >>>
> >>> My initial thought was to make a RAID1 out of a new 1TB disk and my
> >>> existing RAID5 array, but perhaps that doesn't make much sense...
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps I could get a 400GB drive (or more likely 500GB) and make a
> >>> RAID1 with a couple of the existing 200GBs?
> >>>
> >>> ...but I'm just guessing and the purpose of this email is to get advice.
> >>>
> >>> What do you guys think?
> >>>
> >>> Max.
> >>
> >> Tough call, depends on what you want to accomplish? Availability or mass
> >> storage space? You could continue running like you are now and use a 1TiB
> >> disk as your "scratch" area and rsync the important data off to your
> >> RAID-5 nightly for example.
> >>
> >> Another option (probably not a good one) take two of your 200s and make a
> >> RAID1, leave your RAID-5 as-is, buy another 200GiB as a spare and then
> >> with the rest of the $ buy something else, there are no good alternatives,
> >> those are pretty old disks you got there, but I agree if its been running
> >> fine, no reason to replace it.
> > Hehe, i myself am in a somewhat similar position.. i have a 6x300gb
> > raid5 array.. And the disks appears perfectly fine through smart etc,
> > but on the other hand, a SINGLE new disk today can present me with the
> > same level of usable capacity very cheap, and ill bet using considerably
> > less power. Thus i have chosen to very soon retire this setup, and make
> > a replacement 8x1tb or 6x1.5tb raid6 for increased capacity and
> > safety :)
> >
> > i'd recommend you work towards deprecating LOTS of drives in favor of
> > fewer bigger newer, and keep the old ones around as an archive/backup
> > thing.
> Agree here, but the 1.5TiB are not enterprise disks, I would not recommend
> moving to them yet, but rather 1TiB, that is what I am currently doing,
> moving to WD RE3's (1TiB model).
I am somewhat scared of the seagate stuff too.. I however will probably
go the WD10EADS way instead, i know its not the "enterprise" disks, but
they are really lowpower, and well.. i would hope raid6 can bail me out
of any disk failures.
>
> Justin.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-16 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-16 11:10 upgrade advice Max Waterman
2008-12-16 11:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 11:49 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 13:07 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 14:15 ` Redeeman [this message]
2008-12-16 15:57 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 16:10 ` Ryan Wagoner
2008-12-16 16:27 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 23:29 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-17 0:08 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 6:59 ` Redeeman
2008-12-17 13:26 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 14:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:37 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 15:30 ` David Lethe
2008-12-18 7:36 ` Redeeman
2008-12-18 16:37 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 16:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-18 17:18 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 19:14 ` upgrade advice / Disk drive failure rates - real world David Lethe
2008-12-18 22:51 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-19 4:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:46 ` upgrade advice Redeeman
2008-12-17 15:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-13 3:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-13 4:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-12-16 13:09 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-16 13:04 ` Max Waterman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-25 8:40 Holger L. Bille
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1229436950.22331.45.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=davidmaxwaterman@fastmail.co.uk \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.