From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
Cc: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: upgrade advice
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:59:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229497160.22331.73.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cccedfc60812161608y29e6c645n6ff7df5c87292374@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 18:08 -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Jon Nelson wrote:
> >
> >> What about Hitachi?
> >>
> >> Samsung has been my go-to drive for the better part of a decade, and
> >> Seagate hasn't won any favor with me, so I've been relying on Samsung
> >> and Hitachi with great results - so far.
>
> > Enterprise or 'desktop' disks Jon?
>
> Desktop. This is what I've got:
>
> Hitachi Deskstar T7K500 (HDT725032VLA360)
> SAMSUNG SpinPoint T166 series (HD321KJ)
> Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 family (ST3320620AS)*
> WDC WD3200AAKS-75VYA0
>
> * the seagate has the infamous 3.AAK firmware.
>
> I've almost always used Hitachi or Samsung, although I often
> "repurpose" drives from friends and I've had quite a few Maxtor and
> Seagate. The Hitachi does seem to run a bit hotter but it is probably
> my favorite drive of the bunch. The Samsung is nice and quiet,
> vibration-free, like the Hitachi and WD. The Seagate vibrates and is
> the second after the first died within the first few hours.
>
> If I were to buy replacement drives, I almost always look at Hitachi
> and Samsung first.
What sort of volume of disks are you using, and what loads? (24/7 with
high load?)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-16 11:10 upgrade advice Max Waterman
2008-12-16 11:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 11:49 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 13:07 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-16 14:15 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 15:57 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 16:10 ` Ryan Wagoner
2008-12-16 16:27 ` Redeeman
2008-12-16 23:29 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-17 0:08 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 6:59 ` Redeeman [this message]
2008-12-17 13:26 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 14:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:37 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-17 15:30 ` David Lethe
2008-12-18 7:36 ` Redeeman
2008-12-18 16:37 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 16:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-18 17:18 ` John Robinson
2008-12-18 19:14 ` upgrade advice / Disk drive failure rates - real world David Lethe
2008-12-18 22:51 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-19 4:28 ` David Lethe
2008-12-17 14:46 ` upgrade advice Redeeman
2008-12-17 15:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-13 3:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-13 4:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-12-16 13:09 ` Max Waterman
2008-12-16 13:04 ` Max Waterman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-25 8:40 Holger L. Bille
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1229497160.22331.73.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.