From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, wens@csie.org,
jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, samuel@sholland.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for H616
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 13:15:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <122e231c7bb8c7bfc5fe7da745040608@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240508120511.53bbac31@donnerap.manchester.arm.com>
Hello Andre,
On 2024-05-08 13:05, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2024 11:09:41 +0200
> Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Add missing cache information to the Allwinner H616 SoC dtsi, to allow
>> the userspace, which includes lscpu(1) that uses the virtual files
>> provided
>> by the kernel under the /sys/devices/system/cpu directory, to display
>> the
>> proper H616 cache information.
>>
>> Adding the cache information to the H616 SoC dtsi also makes the
>> following
>> warning message in the kernel log go away:
>>
>> cacheinfo: Unable to detect cache hierarchy for CPU 0
>>
>> Rather conspicuously, almost no cache-related information is available
>> in
>> the publicly available Allwinner H616 datasheet (version 1.0) and H616
>> user
>> manual (version 1.0). Thus, the cache parameters for the H616 SoC
>> dtsi were
>> obtained and derived by hand from the cache size and layout
>> specifications
>> found in the following technical reference manual, and from the cache
>> size
>> and die revision hints available from the following community-provided
>> data
>> and memory subsystem benchmarks:
>>
>> - ARM Cortex-A53 revision r0p4 TRM, version J
>> - Summary of the two available H616 die revisions and their
>> differences
>> in cache sizes observed from the CSSIDR_EL1 register readouts,
>> provided
>> by Andre Przywara [1][2]
>> - Tinymembench benchmark results of the H616-based OrangePi Zero 2
>> SBC,
>> provided by Thomas Kaiser [3]
>>
>> For future reference, here's a brief summary of the available
>> documentation
>> and the community-provided data and memory subsystem benchmarks:
>>
>> - All caches employ the 64-byte cache line length
>> - Each Cortex-A53 core has 32 KB of L1 2-way, set-associative
>> instruction
>> cache and 32 KB of L1 4-way, set-associative data cache
>> - The size of the L2 cache depends on the actual H616 die revision
>> (there
>> are two die revisions), so the entire SoC can have either 256 KB
>> or 1 MB
>> of unified L2 16-way, set-associative cache [1]
>>
>> Also for future reference, here's the relevant excerpt from the
>> community-
>> provided H616 memory subsystem benchmark, [3] which confirms that 32
>> KB and
>> 256 KB are the L1 data and L2 cache sizes, respectively:
>>
>> block size : single random read / dual random read
>> 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 65536 : 4.3 ns / 7.3 ns
>> 131072 : 6.6 ns / 10.5 ns
>> 262144 : 9.8 ns / 15.2 ns
>> 524288 : 91.8 ns / 142.9 ns
>> 1048576 : 138.6 ns / 188.3 ns
>> 2097152 : 163.0 ns / 204.8 ns
>> 4194304 : 178.8 ns / 213.5 ns
>> 8388608 : 187.1 ns / 217.9 ns
>> 16777216 : 192.2 ns / 220.9 ns
>> 33554432 : 196.5 ns / 224.0 ns
>> 67108864 : 215.7 ns / 259.5 ns
>
> Thanks for dumping the elaborate information here!
You're welcome! :) I like when patch descriptions provide as much
relevant information as possible, so I always try to do that myself.
>> The changes introduced to the H616 SoC dtsi by this patch specify 256
>> KB as
>> the L2 cache size. As outlined by Andre Przywara, [2] a follow-up
>> TF-A patch
>> will perform runtime adjustment of the device tree data, making the
>> correct
>> L2 cache size of 1 MB present in the device tree for the boards based
>> on the
>> revision of H616 that actually provides 1 MB of L2 cache.
>
> I pushed that TF-A patch for review now:
> https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/28694/1
> On my OrangePi Zero3 (with an 1MB H618 SoC) the size and number of sets
> get adjusted to describe 1MB:
> => fdt list /cpus/l2-cache
> l2-cache {
> compatible = "cache";
> cache-level = <0x00000002>;
> cache-unified;
> cache-size = <0x00100000>;
> cache-line-size = <0x00000040>;
> cache-sets = <0x00000400>;
> phandle = <0x00000003>;
> };
Awesome, thanks for the follow-up TF-A patch! I'll keep an eye
on your TF-A patch submission.
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20240430114627.0cfcd14a@donnerap.manchester.arm.com/
>> [2]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20240501103059.10a8f7de@donnerap.manchester.arm.com/
>> [3]
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ThomasKaiser/sbc-bench/master/results/4knM.txt
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Helped-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
>
> So I can confirm that the information above is correct, and also
> matches
> the DT properties added below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Thanks!
>> ---
>> .../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi | 37
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> index b2e85e52d1a1..4faed88d8909 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> @@ -26,30 +26,67 @@ cpu0: cpu@0 {
>> reg = <0>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu1: cpu@1 {
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> reg = <1>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu2: cpu@2 {
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> reg = <2>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu3: cpu@3 {
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> reg = <3>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + l2_cache: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + cache-level = <2>;
>> + cache-unified;
>> + cache-size = <0x40000>;
>> + cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + cache-sets = <256>;
>> };
>> };
>>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, wens@csie.org,
jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, samuel@sholland.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for H616
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 13:15:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <122e231c7bb8c7bfc5fe7da745040608@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240508120511.53bbac31@donnerap.manchester.arm.com>
Hello Andre,
On 2024-05-08 13:05, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2024 11:09:41 +0200
> Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Add missing cache information to the Allwinner H616 SoC dtsi, to allow
>> the userspace, which includes lscpu(1) that uses the virtual files
>> provided
>> by the kernel under the /sys/devices/system/cpu directory, to display
>> the
>> proper H616 cache information.
>>
>> Adding the cache information to the H616 SoC dtsi also makes the
>> following
>> warning message in the kernel log go away:
>>
>> cacheinfo: Unable to detect cache hierarchy for CPU 0
>>
>> Rather conspicuously, almost no cache-related information is available
>> in
>> the publicly available Allwinner H616 datasheet (version 1.0) and H616
>> user
>> manual (version 1.0). Thus, the cache parameters for the H616 SoC
>> dtsi were
>> obtained and derived by hand from the cache size and layout
>> specifications
>> found in the following technical reference manual, and from the cache
>> size
>> and die revision hints available from the following community-provided
>> data
>> and memory subsystem benchmarks:
>>
>> - ARM Cortex-A53 revision r0p4 TRM, version J
>> - Summary of the two available H616 die revisions and their
>> differences
>> in cache sizes observed from the CSSIDR_EL1 register readouts,
>> provided
>> by Andre Przywara [1][2]
>> - Tinymembench benchmark results of the H616-based OrangePi Zero 2
>> SBC,
>> provided by Thomas Kaiser [3]
>>
>> For future reference, here's a brief summary of the available
>> documentation
>> and the community-provided data and memory subsystem benchmarks:
>>
>> - All caches employ the 64-byte cache line length
>> - Each Cortex-A53 core has 32 KB of L1 2-way, set-associative
>> instruction
>> cache and 32 KB of L1 4-way, set-associative data cache
>> - The size of the L2 cache depends on the actual H616 die revision
>> (there
>> are two die revisions), so the entire SoC can have either 256 KB
>> or 1 MB
>> of unified L2 16-way, set-associative cache [1]
>>
>> Also for future reference, here's the relevant excerpt from the
>> community-
>> provided H616 memory subsystem benchmark, [3] which confirms that 32
>> KB and
>> 256 KB are the L1 data and L2 cache sizes, respectively:
>>
>> block size : single random read / dual random read
>> 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
>> 65536 : 4.3 ns / 7.3 ns
>> 131072 : 6.6 ns / 10.5 ns
>> 262144 : 9.8 ns / 15.2 ns
>> 524288 : 91.8 ns / 142.9 ns
>> 1048576 : 138.6 ns / 188.3 ns
>> 2097152 : 163.0 ns / 204.8 ns
>> 4194304 : 178.8 ns / 213.5 ns
>> 8388608 : 187.1 ns / 217.9 ns
>> 16777216 : 192.2 ns / 220.9 ns
>> 33554432 : 196.5 ns / 224.0 ns
>> 67108864 : 215.7 ns / 259.5 ns
>
> Thanks for dumping the elaborate information here!
You're welcome! :) I like when patch descriptions provide as much
relevant information as possible, so I always try to do that myself.
>> The changes introduced to the H616 SoC dtsi by this patch specify 256
>> KB as
>> the L2 cache size. As outlined by Andre Przywara, [2] a follow-up
>> TF-A patch
>> will perform runtime adjustment of the device tree data, making the
>> correct
>> L2 cache size of 1 MB present in the device tree for the boards based
>> on the
>> revision of H616 that actually provides 1 MB of L2 cache.
>
> I pushed that TF-A patch for review now:
> https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/28694/1
> On my OrangePi Zero3 (with an 1MB H618 SoC) the size and number of sets
> get adjusted to describe 1MB:
> => fdt list /cpus/l2-cache
> l2-cache {
> compatible = "cache";
> cache-level = <0x00000002>;
> cache-unified;
> cache-size = <0x00100000>;
> cache-line-size = <0x00000040>;
> cache-sets = <0x00000400>;
> phandle = <0x00000003>;
> };
Awesome, thanks for the follow-up TF-A patch! I'll keep an eye
on your TF-A patch submission.
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20240430114627.0cfcd14a@donnerap.manchester.arm.com/
>> [2]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20240501103059.10a8f7de@donnerap.manchester.arm.com/
>> [3]
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ThomasKaiser/sbc-bench/master/results/4knM.txt
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Helped-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
>
> So I can confirm that the information above is correct, and also
> matches
> the DT properties added below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Thanks!
>> ---
>> .../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi | 37
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> index b2e85e52d1a1..4faed88d8909 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
>> @@ -26,30 +26,67 @@ cpu0: cpu@0 {
>> reg = <0>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu1: cpu@1 {
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> reg = <1>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu2: cpu@2 {
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> reg = <2>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu3: cpu@3 {
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> reg = <3>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
>> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
>> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
>> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
>> + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + l2_cache: l2-cache {
>> + compatible = "cache";
>> + cache-level = <2>;
>> + cache-unified;
>> + cache-size = <0x40000>;
>> + cache-line-size = <64>;
>> + cache-sets = <256>;
>> };
>> };
>>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-08 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 9:09 [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for H616 Dragan Simic
2024-05-03 9:09 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-08 11:05 ` Andre Przywara
2024-05-08 11:05 ` Andre Przywara
2024-05-08 11:15 ` Dragan Simic [this message]
2024-05-08 11:15 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-28 16:08 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-05-28 16:08 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-05-28 16:47 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-28 16:47 ` Dragan Simic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=122e231c7bb8c7bfc5fe7da745040608@manjaro.org \
--to=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.