All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] stackprotector: update make rules
Date: Mon,  9 Feb 2009 22:39:53 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234186798-16820-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234186798-16820-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Impact: no default -fno-stack-protector if stackp is enabled, cleanup

Stackprotector make rules had the following problems.

* cc support test and warning are scattered across makefile and
  kernel/panic.c.

* -fno-stack-protector was always added regardless of configuration.

Update such that cc support test and warning are contained in makefile
and -fno-stack-protector is added iff stackp is turned off.  While at
it, prepare for 32bit support.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 Makefile                                  |    3 ++-
 arch/x86/Makefile                         |   17 ++++++++++-------
 kernel/panic.c                            |    4 ----
 scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh |    4 +++-
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index d0634bc..1ab7cef 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -532,8 +532,9 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
 endif
 
 # Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
-# Arch Makefiles may override this setting
+ifndef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
+endif
 
 ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index eb7b986..8597305 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -70,14 +70,17 @@ else
         # this works around some issues with generating unwind tables in older gccs
         # newer gccs do it by default
         KBUILD_CFLAGS += -maccumulate-outgoing-args
+endif
 
-        stackp := $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
-        stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) := $(shell $(stackp) \
-                "$(CC)" "-fstack-protector -DGCC_HAS_SP" )
-        stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += $(shell $(stackp) \
-                "$(CC)" -fstack-protector-all )
-
-        KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y)
+ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+	cc_has_sp := $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_$(BITS)-has-stack-protector.sh
+        ifeq ($(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(cc_has_sp) $(CC)),y)
+                stackp-y := -fstack-protector
+                stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += -fstack-protector-all
+                KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y)
+        else
+                $(warning stack protector enabled but no compiler support)
+        endif
 endif
 
 # Don't unroll struct assignments with kmemcheck enabled
diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index 33cab3d..32fe4ef 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -359,10 +359,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(warn_slowpath);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
 
-#ifndef GCC_HAS_SP
-#warning You have selected the CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR option, but the gcc used does not support this.
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Called when gcc's -fstack-protector feature is used, and
  * gcc detects corruption of the on-stack canary value
diff --git a/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh b/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
index 325c0a1..2d69fcd 100644
--- a/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
+++ b/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
@@ -2,5 +2,7 @@
 
 echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $1 -S -xc -c -O0 -mcmodel=kernel -fstack-protector - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%gs"
 if [ "$?" -eq "0" ] ; then
-	echo $2
+	echo y
+else
+	echo n
 fi
-- 
1.6.0.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-09 13:39 [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86: include correct %gs in a.out core dump Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 17:12   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: math_emu info cleanup Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:42   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:45     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:52       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86: fix math_emu register frame access Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 17:13   ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-09 23:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10  1:08     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] elf: add ELF_CORE_COPY_KERNEL_REGS() Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86: stackprotector.h misc update Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86: no stack protector for vdso Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86: use asm .macro instead of cpp #define in entry_32.S Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 18:34   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10  1:14     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10  1:18       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10 11:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: add %gs accessors for x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86: make lazy %gs optional on x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 18:12   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10  1:27     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10  1:51       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86: implement x86_32 stack protector Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 15:25   ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-10 15:39     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-11  7:31       ` [PATCH x86#core/percpu] x86: fix x86_32 stack protector bugs Tejun Heo
2009-02-11 10:34         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:18           ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:55 ` [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:06   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 20:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 13:56       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 13:54     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:16       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 14:26           ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-11 10:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 11:18               ` [PATCH] stackprotector: fix multi-word cross-builds Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:19       ` [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:09 ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-09 14:15   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10  1:36     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1234186798-16820-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.