From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: [PATCH x86#core/percpu] x86: fix x86_32 stack protector bugs
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:31:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49927EB4.3050507@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49919FA2.9050309@kernel.org>
Impact: fix x86_32 stack protector
Brian Gerst found out that %gs was being initialized to stack_canary
instead of stack_canary - 20, which basically gave the same canary
value for all threads. Fixing this also exposed the following bugs.
* cpu_idle() didn't call boot_init_stack_canary()
* stack canary switching in switch_to() was being done too late making
the initial run of a new thread use the old stack canary value.
Fix all of them and while at it update comment in cpu_idle() about
calling boot_init_stack_canary().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/system.h | 8 +++-----
arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 11 +++++------
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
index fa7e5bd..c2d742c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
static inline void setup_stack_canary_segment(int cpu)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- unsigned long canary = (unsigned long)&per_cpu(stack_canary, cpu);
+ unsigned long canary = (unsigned long)&per_cpu(stack_canary, cpu) - 20;
struct desc_struct *gdt_table = get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu);
struct desc_struct desc;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
index 2692ee8..7a80f72 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
@@ -25,13 +25,11 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
#define __switch_canary \
- "movl "__percpu_arg([current_task])",%%ebx\n\t" \
- "movl %P[task_canary](%%ebx),%%ebx\n\t" \
- "movl %%ebx,"__percpu_arg([stack_canary])"\n\t"
+ "movl %P[task_canary](%[next]), %%ebx\n\t" \
+ "movl %%ebx, "__percpu_arg([stack_canary])"\n\t"
#define __switch_canary_oparam \
, [stack_canary] "=m" (per_cpu_var(stack_canary))
#define __switch_canary_iparam \
- , [current_task] "m" (per_cpu_var(current_task)) \
, [task_canary] "i" (offsetof(struct task_struct, stack_canary))
#else /* CC_STACKPROTECTOR */
#define __switch_canary
@@ -60,9 +58,9 @@ do { \
"movl %[next_sp],%%esp\n\t" /* restore ESP */ \
"movl $1f,%[prev_ip]\n\t" /* save EIP */ \
"pushl %[next_ip]\n\t" /* restore EIP */ \
+ __switch_canary \
"jmp __switch_to\n" /* regparm call */ \
"1:\t" \
- __switch_canary \
"popl %%ebp\n\t" /* restore EBP */ \
"popfl\n" /* restore flags */ \
\
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
index 924e316..cf21fd0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ is386: movl $2,%ecx # set MP
jne 1f
movl $per_cpu__gdt_page,%eax
movl $per_cpu__stack_canary,%ecx
+ subl $20, %ecx
movw %cx, 8 * GDT_ENTRY_STACK_CANARY + 2(%eax)
shrl $16, %ecx
movb %cl, 8 * GDT_ENTRY_STACK_CANARY + 4(%eax)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index 9a62383..b50604b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <stdarg.h>
+#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -91,6 +92,15 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ /*
+ * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the stack canary up
+ * for us. CPU0 already has it initialized but no harm in
+ * doing it again. This is a good place for updating it, as
+ * we wont ever return from this function (so the invalid
+ * canaries already on the stack wont ever trigger).
+ */
+ boot_init_stack_canary();
+
current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index 8eb169e..836ef65 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -120,12 +120,11 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
/*
- * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the PDA stack
- * canary up for us - and if we are the boot CPU we have
- * a 0 stack canary. This is a good place for updating
- * it, as we wont ever return from this function (so the
- * invalid canaries already on the stack wont ever
- * trigger):
+ * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the stack canary up
+ * for us. CPU0 already has it initialized but no harm in
+ * doing it again. This is a good place for updating it, as
+ * we wont ever return from this function (so the invalid
+ * canaries already on the stack wont ever trigger).
*/
boot_init_stack_canary();
--
1.6.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-09 13:39 [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86: include correct %gs in a.out core dump Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 17:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: math_emu info cleanup Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86: fix math_emu register frame access Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 17:13 ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-09 23:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 1:08 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] elf: add ELF_CORE_COPY_KERNEL_REGS() Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86: stackprotector.h misc update Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] stackprotector: update make rules Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86: no stack protector for vdso Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86: use asm .macro instead of cpp #define in entry_32.S Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 18:34 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10 1:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 1:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10 11:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: add %gs accessors for x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86: make lazy %gs optional on x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 18:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10 1:27 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 1:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86: implement x86_32 stack protector Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 15:25 ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-10 15:39 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-11 7:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-02-11 10:34 ` [PATCH x86#core/percpu] x86: fix x86_32 stack protector bugs Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:55 ` [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 20:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 13:56 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 13:54 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 14:26 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-11 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 11:18 ` [PATCH] stackprotector: fix multi-word cross-builds Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:19 ` [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:09 ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-09 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 1:36 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49927EB4.3050507@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.