[ath9k-devel] Shared module for regulatory support

[ath9k-devel] Shared module for regulatory support

[Bob Copeland]

Hi all,

I have some preliminary code that takes the ath9k regulatory stuff and
puts it into a shared module that ath5k and ath9k can both use.  The
patchset needs some cleanup and testing so I'll hold off on patch
bombing for now, but you can find it at:

http://bobcopeland.com/kernel/wl/20090211/

Thanks!
-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com

[ath9k-devel] [ath5k-devel] Shared module for regulatory support

[Pavel Roskin]

On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 11:19 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have some preliminary code that takes the ath9k regulatory stuff and
> puts it into a shared module that ath5k and ath9k can both use.  The
> patchset needs some cleanup and testing so I'll hold off on patch
> bombing for now, but you can find it at:
> 
> http://bobcopeland.com/kernel/wl/20090211/

Most patches (before the "ath" directory creation) look pretty
uncontroversial and could be submitted so that they get some testing
early.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

[ath9k-devel] [ath5k-devel] Shared module for regulatory support

[Bob Copeland]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 11:19 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some preliminary code that takes the ath9k regulatory stuff and
>> puts it into a shared module that ath5k and ath9k can both use.  The
>> patchset needs some cleanup and testing so I'll hold off on patch
>> bombing for now, but you can find it at:
>>
>> http://bobcopeland.com/kernel/wl/20090211/
>
> Most patches (before the "ath" directory creation) look pretty
> uncontroversial and could be submitted so that they get some testing
> early.

Agreed, the first 6 or so are intentionally tiny, mostly trivial
patches.  But they will at least need rebasing since Sujith had
some similar cleanups, so I'll post them once I do that.

(Also patch 7 needed format-patch -M, oh well.)

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com