From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Subject: Re: RT scheduling and a way to make a process hang, unkillable
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:23:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234794204.30178.10.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234790371.30178.8.camel@laptop>
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 14:19 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 18:44 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > (This is not a good day!)
>
> Monday strikes again ;-)
>
> > @@ -572,6 +572,9 @@ static int set_user(struct cred *new)
> > if (!new_user)
> > return -EAGAIN;
>
> So here we just allocated new_user and made sure we didn't fail that
> allocation.
>
> > + if (!task_can_switch_user(new->uid, current))
> > + return -EAGAIN;
>
> And here you bail, without freeing new_user. The idea was to do this
> check before alloc_uid().
>
> > if (atomic_read(&new_user->processes) >=
> > current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_NPROC].rlim_cur &&
> > new_user != INIT_USER) {
Ah, I now see I send you down a hole here,.. your find_user() in
task_can_switch_user() relies on that alloc_uid(). So you have to do it
after, and just free the new_user thingy when the test fails.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 0:51 RT scheduling and a way to make a process hang, unkillable Corey Hickey
2009-02-15 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 10:36 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 12:02 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 13:14 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-02-16 13:20 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 19:18 ` Corey Hickey
2009-02-17 5:00 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-17 10:15 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-17 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-18 0:09 ` Corey Hickey
2009-02-23 11:45 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-23 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-24 9:18 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-24 15:58 ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-24 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-24 19:29 ` Chris Friesen
2009-02-27 9:43 ` [PATCH] sched: Don't allow setuid to succeed if the user does not have rt bandwidth Dhaval Giani
2009-02-27 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-16 20:16 ` RT scheduling and a way to make a process hang, unkillable Kyle Moffett
2009-02-16 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 7:22 ` Dhaval Giani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234794204.30178.10.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bugfood-ml@fatooh.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.