From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: RT scheduling and a way to make a process hang, unkillable
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:15:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090223114541.GD31277@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234869339.4744.77.camel@laptop>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 15:45 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>
> > sched: Don't allow setuid to succeed if the user does not have rt bandwidth
> >
> > Corey Hickey reported that on using setuid to change the uid of a
> > rt process, the process would be unkillable and not be running.
> > This is because there was no rt runtime for that user group. Add
> > in a check to see if a user can attach an rt task to its task group.
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> Does anybody object to the -ENOSPC return value? Should we introduce
> -ENOTIME for that?
>
> Michael, Alan?
>
Hi,
Any comments on which return value to return? Should we introduce
-ENOTIME?
Corey mentioned he found ENOSPC confusing.
Thanks,
--
regards,
Dhaval
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 0:51 RT scheduling and a way to make a process hang, unkillable Corey Hickey
2009-02-15 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 10:36 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 12:02 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 13:14 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 13:20 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-16 19:18 ` Corey Hickey
2009-02-17 5:00 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-17 10:15 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-17 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-18 0:09 ` Corey Hickey
2009-02-23 11:45 ` Dhaval Giani [this message]
2009-02-23 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-24 9:18 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-02-24 15:58 ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-24 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-24 19:29 ` Chris Friesen
2009-02-27 9:43 ` [PATCH] sched: Don't allow setuid to succeed if the user does not have rt bandwidth Dhaval Giani
2009-02-27 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-16 20:16 ` RT scheduling and a way to make a process hang, unkillable Kyle Moffett
2009-02-16 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 7:22 ` Dhaval Giani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090223114541.GD31277@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bugfood-ml@fatooh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.