From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] generic-ipi: remove kmalloc()
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:49:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234903781.4744.235.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234901777.4744.233.camel@laptop>
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 21:16 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 21:11 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > As for the previous version. I am almost sure I missed something
> > > again, but do we really need both CSD_FLAG_WAIT and CSD_FLAG_LOCK
> > > flags? smp_call_function_many(wait => 1) can just wait for
> > > !CSD_FLAG_LOCK.
> >
> > I suppose we can.
>
> Ah, no, that would mean we cannot distinguish between the sync and async
> case in generic_exec_single().
Which can of course be solved like so, we could even drop the new .wait
argument to __smp_call_function_single() as CSD_FLAG_WAIT wasn't exposed
before and non of the current users use it.
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ static struct {
};
enum {
- CSD_FLAG_WAIT = 0x01,
- CSD_FLAG_LOCK = 0x02,
+ CSD_FLAG_LOCK = 0x01,
};
struct call_function_data {
@@ -95,41 +94,21 @@ static int __cpuinit init_call_single_da
early_initcall(init_call_single_data);
/*
- * csd_wait/csd_complete are used for synchronous ipi calls
- */
-static void csd_wait_prepare(struct call_single_data *data)
-{
- data->flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
-}
-
-static void csd_complete(struct call_single_data *data)
-{
- if (data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
- /*
- * Serialize stores to data with the flag clear and wakeup.
- */
- smp_wmb();
- data->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
- }
-}
-
-static void csd_wait(struct call_single_data *data)
-{
- while (data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT)
- cpu_relax();
-}
-
-/*
* csd_lock/csd_unlock used to serialize access to per-cpu csd resources
*
* For non-synchronous ipi calls the csd can still be in use by the previous
* function call. For multi-cpu calls its even more interesting as we'll have
* to ensure no other cpu is observing our csd.
*/
-static void csd_lock(struct call_single_data *data)
+static void csd_lock_wait(struct call_single_data *data)
{
while (data->flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
cpu_relax();
+}
+
+static void csd_lock(struct call_single_data *data)
+{
+ csd_lock_wait(data);
data->flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
}
@@ -147,11 +126,12 @@ static void csd_unlock(struct call_singl
* Insert a previously allocated call_single_data element for execution
* on the given CPU. data must already have ->func, ->info, and ->flags set.
*/
-static void generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
+static
+void generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data, int wait)
{
struct call_single_queue *dst = &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu);
- int wait = data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT, ipi;
unsigned long flags;
+ int ipi;
spin_lock_irqsave(&dst->lock, flags);
ipi = list_empty(&dst->list);
@@ -174,7 +154,7 @@ static void generic_exec_single(int cpu,
arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
if (wait)
- csd_wait(data);
+ csd_lock_wait(data);
}
/*
@@ -222,7 +202,6 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
if (refs)
continue;
- csd_complete(&data->csd);
csd_unlock(&data->csd);
}
@@ -260,9 +239,6 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_single_in
data->func(data->info);
- if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT)
- csd_complete(data);
-
/*
* Unlocked CSDs are valid through generic_exec_single()
*/
@@ -303,36 +279,16 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, vo
func(info);
local_irq_restore(flags);
} else if ((unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(cpu)) {
- struct call_single_data *data;
+ struct call_single_data *data = &d;
- if (!wait) {
- /*
- * We are calling a function on a single CPU
- * and we are not going to wait for it to finish.
- * We use a per cpu data to pass the information to
- * that CPU. Since all callers of this code will
- * use the same data, we must synchronize the
- * callers to prevent a new caller from corrupting
- * the data before the callee can access it.
- *
- * The CSD_FLAG_LOCK is used to let us know when
- * the IPI handler is done with the data.
- * The first caller will set it, and the callee
- * will clear it. The next caller must wait for
- * it to clear before we set it again. This
- * will make sure the callee is done with the
- * data before a new caller will use it.
- */
+ if (!wait)
data = &per_cpu(csd_data, me);
- csd_lock(data);
- } else {
- data = &d;
- csd_wait_prepare(data);
- }
+
+ csd_lock(data);
data->func = func;
data->info = info;
- generic_exec_single(cpu, data);
+ generic_exec_single(cpu, data, wait);
} else {
err = -ENXIO; /* CPU not online */
}
@@ -352,12 +308,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single);
* instance.
*
*/
-void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
+void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data,
+ int wait)
{
+ if (wait)
+ csd_lock(data);
+
/* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
- WARN_ON((data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) && irqs_disabled());
+ WARN_ON(wait && irqs_disabled());
- generic_exec_single(cpu, data);
+ generic_exec_single(cpu, data, wait);
}
/* FIXME: Shim for archs using old arch_send_call_function_ipi API. */
@@ -415,9 +375,6 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
csd_lock(&data->csd);
spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
- if (wait)
- csd_wait_prepare(&data->csd);
-
data->csd.func = func;
data->csd.info = info;
cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
@@ -446,7 +403,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
/* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
if (wait)
- csd_wait(&data->csd);
+ csd_lock_wait(&data->csd);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);
Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-softirq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-softirq.c
+++ linux-2.6/block/blk-softirq.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int raise_blk_irq(int cpu, struct
data->info = rq;
data->flags = 0;
- __smp_call_function_single(cpu, data);
+ __smp_call_function_single(cpu, data, 0);
return 0;
}
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ static void hrtick_start(struct rq *rq,
if (rq == this_rq()) {
hrtimer_restart(timer);
} else if (!rq->hrtick_csd_pending) {
- __smp_call_function_single(cpu_of(rq), &rq->hrtick_csd);
+ __smp_call_function_single(cpu_of(rq), &rq->hrtick_csd, 0);
rq->hrtick_csd_pending = 1;
}
}
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/softirq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/softirq.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static int __try_remote_softirq(struct c
cp->flags = 0;
cp->priv = softirq;
- __smp_call_function_single(cpu, cp);
+ __smp_call_function_single(cpu, cp, 0);
return 0;
}
return 1;
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/smp.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/smp.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, v
return 0;
}
-void __smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, struct call_single_data *data);
+void __smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, struct call_single_data *data,
+ int wait);
/*
* Generic and arch helpers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-17 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-16 16:38 [PATCH 0/4] generic smp helpers vs kmalloc Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many() Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 19:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 20:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 20:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 21:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 12:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 20:49 ` Q: smp.c && barriers (Was: [PATCH 1/4] generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many()) Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 21:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 21:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 21:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 22:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 22:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 23:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 10:11 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 10:39 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 11:26 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 15:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-18 2:15 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18 2:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 19:28 ` Q: " Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 21:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 22:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-18 13:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-18 16:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 16:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 17:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 17:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 18:33 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18 16:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-02-19 0:12 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 6:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-19 13:11 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 21:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-18 2:21 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18 13:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-18 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 16:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 18:43 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18 19:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 23:55 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-19 12:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 12:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 22:00 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-20 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 18:56 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-20 19:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 23:28 ` Jack Steiner
2009-02-25 3:32 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-25 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25 18:25 ` Luck, Tony
2009-03-17 18:16 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-03-18 8:51 ` [tip:x86/x2apic] x86: add x2apic_wrmsr_fence() to x2apic flush tlb paths Suresh Siddha
2009-02-17 12:40 ` Q: smp.c && barriers (Was: [PATCH 1/4] generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many()) Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 15:40 ` [PATCH] generic-smp: remove kmalloc() Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 17:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 17:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 19:29 ` [PATCH -v4] generic-ipi: " Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 20:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 20:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 20:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 20:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-02-17 22:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 22:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 21:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 21:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] generic-smp: remove kmalloc usage Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 0:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-17 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-17 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 4:50 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-18 16:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 0:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-19 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 4:31 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-19 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-19 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2009-02-19 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-17 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-16 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] generic-smp: properly allocate the cpumasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 23:17 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-16 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic-smp: clean up some of the csd->flags fiddling Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234903781.4744.235.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.