All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] generic-smp: clean up some of the csd->flags fiddling
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:38:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090216164114.700407913@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090216163847.431174825@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: smp-cleanup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4672 bytes --]

Break out the WAIT and LOCK bit operations into functions and provide some
extra comments.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/smp.c |  100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c
@@ -100,14 +100,50 @@ static int __cpuinit init_call_single_da
 }
 early_initcall(init_call_single_data);
 
-static void csd_flag_wait(struct call_single_data *data)
+/*
+ * csd_wait/csd_complete are used for synchronous ipi calls
+ */
+static void csd_wait_prepare(struct call_single_data *data)
+{
+	data->flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
+}
+
+static void csd_complete(struct call_single_data *data)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Serialize stores to data with the flag clear and wakeup.
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	data->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
+}
+
+static void csd_wait(struct call_single_data *data)
+{
+	while (data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT)
+		cpu_relax();
+}
+
+/*
+ * csd_lock/csd_unlock used to serialize access to per-cpu csd resources
+ *
+ * For non-synchronous ipi calls the csd can still be in use by the previous
+ * function call. For multi-cpu calls its even more interesting as we'll have
+ * to ensure no other cpu is observing our csd.
+ */
+static void csd_lock(struct call_single_data *data)
 {
-	/* Wait for response */
-	do {
-		if (!(data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT))
-			break;
+	while (data->flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
 		cpu_relax();
-	} while (1);
+	data->flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
+}
+
+static void csd_unlock(struct call_single_data *data)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Serialize stores to data with the flags clear.
+	 */
+	smp_wmb();
+	data->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -134,7 +170,7 @@ static void generic_exec_single(int cpu,
 		arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
 
 	if (wait)
-		csd_flag_wait(data);
+		csd_wait(data);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -172,18 +208,17 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
 		spin_lock(&call_function.lock);
 		list_add(&data->free_list, &call_function.free_list);
 		list_del_rcu(&data->csd.list);
+		/*
+		 * When the global queue is empty, its guaranteed that no cpu
+		 * is still observing any entry on the free_list, therefore
+		 * we can go ahead and unlock them.
+		 */
 		if (!--call_function.counter)
 			list_splice_init(&call_function.free_list, &free_list);
 		spin_unlock(&call_function.lock);
 
-		if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
-			/*
-			 * serialize stores to data with the flag clear
-			 * and wakeup
-			 */
-			smp_wmb();
-			data->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
-		}
+		if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT)
+			csd_complete(&data->csd);
 
 		while (!list_empty(&free_list)) {
 			struct call_function_data *free;
@@ -192,12 +227,7 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
 					struct call_function_data, free_list);
 
 			list_del(&data->free_list);
-			/*
-			 * serialize stores to data with the flags
-			 * clear
-			 */
-			smp_wmb();
-			free->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
+			csd_unlock(&free->csd);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -242,13 +272,10 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_single_in
 
 			data->func(data->info);
 
-			if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
-				smp_wmb();
-				data->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
-			} else if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK) {
-				smp_wmb();
-				data->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
-			}
+			if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT)
+				csd_complete(data);
+			else if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
+				csd_unlock(data);
 		}
 		/*
 		 * See comment on outer loop
@@ -308,12 +335,10 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, vo
 			 * data before a new caller will use it.
 			 */
 			data = &per_cpu(csd_data, me);
-			while (data->flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
-				cpu_relax();
-			data->flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
+			csd_lock(data);
 		} else {
 			data = &d;
-			data->flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
+			csd_wait_prepare(data);
 		}
 
 		data->func = func;
@@ -398,16 +423,11 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
 	}
 
 	data = &per_cpu(cfd_data, me);
-	/*
-	 * We need to wait for all previous users to go away.
-	 */
-	while (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
-		cpu_relax();
-	data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
+	csd_lock(&data->csd);
 
 	spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
 	if (wait)
-		data->csd.flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
+		csd_wait_prepare(&data->csd);
 	data->csd.func = func;
 	data->csd.info = info;
 	cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
@@ -429,7 +449,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
 
 	/* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
 	if (wait)
-		csd_flag_wait(&data->csd);
+		csd_wait(&data->csd);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);
 

-- 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-16 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-16 16:38 [PATCH 0/4] generic smp helpers vs kmalloc Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many() Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 19:10   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 19:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 20:30       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 20:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 21:22           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 12:25     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 20:49   ` Q: smp.c && barriers (Was: [PATCH 1/4] generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many()) Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 21:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 21:32       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 21:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 22:02           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-16 22:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 23:19               ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17  9:29                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 10:11                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 10:27                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 10:39                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 11:26                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 11:48                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 15:51                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-18  2:15                           ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18  2:40                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 19:28                         ` Q: " Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 21:32                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 21:45                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 22:39                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-18 13:52                                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-18 16:09                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 16:21                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 16:21                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 16:21                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 16:33                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 16:58                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:05                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:10                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:17                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 17:23                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:14                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 17:47                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 18:33                                               ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18 16:37                                       ` Gleb Natapov
2009-02-19  0:12                                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19  6:47                                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-19 13:11                                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 15:06                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 21:49                                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-18  2:21                         ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18 13:59                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-18 16:19                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-18 16:23                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 18:43                             ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-18 19:17                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 23:55                                 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-19 12:20                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 12:29                                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 12:45                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 22:00                                     ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-20 10:56                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 18:56                                         ` Suresh Siddha
2009-02-20 19:40                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 23:28                                           ` Jack Steiner
2009-02-25  3:32                                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-25 12:47                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25 18:25                                             ` Luck, Tony
2009-03-17 18:16                                             ` Suresh Siddha
2009-03-18  8:51                                               ` [tip:x86/x2apic] x86: add x2apic_wrmsr_fence() to x2apic flush tlb paths Suresh Siddha
2009-02-17 12:40                   ` Q: smp.c && barriers (Was: [PATCH 1/4] generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many()) Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 15:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 15:40   ` [PATCH] generic-smp: remove kmalloc() Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 17:21     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 17:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 17:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 18:30           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 19:29         ` [PATCH -v4] generic-ipi: " Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 20:02           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 20:11             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 20:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 20:44                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 20:49                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 22:09                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-17 22:15                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 21:30           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-17 21:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] generic-smp: remove kmalloc usage Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17  0:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-17  8:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17  9:43       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-17  9:49         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 10:56           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18  4:50         ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-18 16:05           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19  0:00             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-19 12:21               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19  4:31             ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-19  9:10               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-19 11:04                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-02-19 16:52               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-17 15:44       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-16 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] generic-smp: properly allocate the cpumasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 23:17   ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-16 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090216164114.700407913@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.