All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
To: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100: race between isr_indicate_associated and rx path
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:55:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235696139.6354.584.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902251340.02010.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 20:39 +0800, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> Argh! Just found out why dev_activate is called such late after
> netif_carrier_on:
> 
> ipw2100 calls netif_carrier_on followed by netif_wake_queue when the
> driver
> moves from associating to associated state. netif_carrier_on will then
> call linkwatch_fire_event. However the carrier_on event is not treated
> as
> urgent and as such the event is delayed (and thus dev_activate too).
> 
> An event is considered urgent if the netdev is running, has a carrier
> _and_ any of the TX qdiscs changed. Since ipw2100 first calls
> carrier_on,
> the last condition is not met and thus the event is not considered
> urgent and gets delayed.

Calling netif_wake_queue() before netif_carrier_on() is not correct in
semantics. Even it works, it looks like a workaround hack. I still think
making a sync version of netif_carrier_on is the way to go.

> Just changing the order to first wake up the queues followed by the
> carrier_on results in an urgent event. I ran a few tests with that
> change
> (+ frame buffering patch) and wasn't able to trigger the race again.
> 
> I'll fold that into the frame buffer patch and send it to
> ipw2100-devel
> once I finished the tests.

Sounds good.

Thanks,
-yi


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200901211734.48625.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <200901271521.24395.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <200902051511.31268.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <200902231138.58067.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
2009-02-24  3:34       ` [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100: race between isr_indicate_associated and rx path Zhu Yi
2009-02-24 12:15         ` Helmut Schaa
2009-02-25  1:18           ` Zhu Yi
2009-02-25 12:39             ` Helmut Schaa
2009-02-27  0:55               ` Zhu Yi [this message]
2009-03-03 11:33                 ` Helmut Schaa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1235696139.6354.584.camel@debian \
    --to=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.