All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@gmail.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] remove rq->lock from cpuacct cgroup (Was Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:40:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236073236.18955.46.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4132000000381ebc2ba5c2ffe9bb1bd.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 18:04 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:42 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >
> >> > Furthermore, if you want something like schedule_work_on() for each
> >> cpu,
> >> > there's schedule_on_each_cpu().
> >> >
> >> It can't pass arguments...Maybe I should use rq->lock here to reset
> >> other cpu's value.
> >
> > Why bother with serializing the reset code at all?
> >
>   I don't think reset v.s. read is problem but reset v.s. increment
>   (read-modify-write) can't be ?

Sure, can be, do we care?



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-03  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-26  7:40 [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction Li Zefan
2009-02-26  8:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26  8:17   ` Li Zefan
2009-02-26  8:22     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26  8:35       ` Li Zefan
2009-02-26  8:40         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 10:10           ` Bharata B Rao
2009-02-26 10:28             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 10:44               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 10:55                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 11:22                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 11:17                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 11:28                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 12:06                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 12:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 12:26                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-26 12:40                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-02-27  4:25                           ` Paul Mackerras
2009-02-26 16:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-27  0:58                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27  1:29                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-27  3:22                             ` [RFC][PATCH] remove rq->lock from cpuacct cgroup (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-02 14:56                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-02 23:42                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03  7:51                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-03  9:04                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03  9:40                                       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-03-03 10:42                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03 10:44                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03 11:54                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-04  6:32                                             ` [PATCH] remove rq->lock from cpuacct cgroup v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-04  7:54                                               ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-04  8:20                                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-04  8:46                                                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-04 10:35                                                     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-04 12:11                                                   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-04 14:17                                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26  8:37 ` [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction Balbir Singh
2009-02-26  8:41   ` Li Zefan
2009-02-26 10:40     ` Balbir Singh
2009-02-26 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26  8:43   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236073236.18955.46.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata.rao@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.