All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@gmail.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:26:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090226122623.GC23099@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235650806.4948.71.camel@laptop>


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:06 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > Hmm.. some routine like
> > atomic64_read() can help this ? (But I don't want to use atomic_t here..)
> 
> Yeah, atomic64_t has been proposed numerous times, and x86 
> could actually implement that using cmpxchg8b, just not sure 
> about all the other 32bit archs, and if we start using it in 
> the scheduler, they'd better have it implemented.

I have written a working atomic64_t implementation for 
tip:perfcounters/core, for 32-bit x86.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-26 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-26  7:40 [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction Li Zefan
2009-02-26  8:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26  8:17   ` Li Zefan
2009-02-26  8:22     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26  8:35       ` Li Zefan
2009-02-26  8:40         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 10:10           ` Bharata B Rao
2009-02-26 10:28             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 10:44               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 10:55                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 11:22                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 11:17                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 11:28                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 12:06                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26 12:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 12:26                         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-26 12:40                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-02-27  4:25                           ` Paul Mackerras
2009-02-26 16:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-27  0:58                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-27  1:29                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-27  3:22                             ` [RFC][PATCH] remove rq->lock from cpuacct cgroup (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-02 14:56                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-02 23:42                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03  7:51                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-03  9:04                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03  9:40                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-03 10:42                                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03 10:44                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-03 11:54                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-04  6:32                                             ` [PATCH] remove rq->lock from cpuacct cgroup v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-04  7:54                                               ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-04  8:20                                                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-04  8:46                                                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-04 10:35                                                     ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-04 12:11                                                   ` Bharata B Rao
2009-03-04 14:17                                                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-26  8:37 ` [PATCH] cpuacct: add a branch prediction Balbir Singh
2009-02-26  8:41   ` Li Zefan
2009-02-26 10:40     ` Balbir Singh
2009-02-26 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26  8:43   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090226122623.GC23099@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata.rao@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.