From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] [XFS] Remove unused parameter from xfs_reclaim_inodes
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:46:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1237117603-26071-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237117603-26071-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
The noblock parameter of xfs_reclaim_inodes() is only
ever set to zero. Remove it and all the conditional
code that is never executed.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c | 23 ++++-------------------
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
index 1fa29de..f9c2a56 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ xfs_quiesce_fs(
int count = 0, pincount;
xfs_flush_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp, 0);
- xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
+ xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
/*
* This loop must run at least twice. The first instance of the loop
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ xfs_sync_worker(
if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)) {
xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE);
- xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
+ xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
/* dgc: errors ignored here */
error = XFS_QM_DQSYNC(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
error = xfs_sync_fsdata(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
@@ -728,7 +728,6 @@ STATIC void
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
int ag,
- int noblock,
int mode)
{
xfs_inode_t *ip = NULL;
@@ -775,26 +774,13 @@ restart:
read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
continue;
}
-
- if (noblock) {
- if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) {
- read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
- continue;
- }
- if (xfs_ipincount(ip) ||
- !xfs_iflock_nowait(ip)) {
- xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
- continue;
- }
- }
read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
/*
* hmmm - this is an inode already in reclaim. Do
* we even bother catching it here?
*/
- if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, noblock, mode))
+ if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, 0, mode))
skipped++;
} while (nr_found);
@@ -809,7 +795,6 @@ restart:
int
xfs_reclaim_inodes(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
- int noblock,
int mode)
{
int i;
@@ -817,7 +802,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes(
for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++) {
if (!mp->m_perag[i].pag_ici_init)
continue;
- xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, noblock, mode);
+ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, mode);
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
index 308d5bf..d7b2b5f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void xfs_quiesce_attr(struct xfs_mount *mp);
void xfs_flush_inodes(struct xfs_inode *ip);
int xfs_reclaim_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip, int locked, int sync_mode);
-int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int noblock, int mode);
+int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int mode);
void xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index 664961e..30918da 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ xfs_unmountfs(
* need to force the log first.
*/
xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE | XFS_LOG_SYNC);
- xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
+ xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
XFS_QM_DQPURGEALL(mp, XFS_QMOPT_QUOTALL | XFS_QMOPT_UMOUNTING);
--
1.6.2
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-15 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-15 11:46 [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker Dave Chinner
2009-03-15 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] [XFS] Split inode data writeback from inode sync Dave Chinner
2009-03-16 10:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-16 10:47 ` Dave Chinner
2009-03-15 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] [XFS] Use xfs_inode_flush() in xfs_sync_inodes_ag() Dave Chinner
2009-03-15 11:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] [XFS] Factor out inode validation for sync Dave Chinner
2009-03-15 11:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] [XFS] Factor out inode validation for reclaim Dave Chinner
2009-03-15 11:46 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2009-03-15 11:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] [XFS] introduce a per-ag inode iterator Dave Chinner
2009-03-16 7:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-16 9:40 ` Dave Chinner
2009-03-16 10:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-16 10:35 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1237117603-26071-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.