* [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/cpu.h cleanup
@ 2009-03-22 8:16 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-22 17:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-03-22 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML
Hello Ingo,
Is it worth to move arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h data to asm/cpu.h and if
required we can also make it private like:
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#ifndef MODULE
private data for kernel only
#endif
#endif
By this way we move header files to include directory. Or you have some
better option.
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:28:39 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: cpu/cpu.h cleanup
Impact: cleanup
- Fix various style issues
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
index 9469ecb..6de9a90 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
@@ -3,25 +3,25 @@
#define ARCH_X86_CPU_H
struct cpu_model_info {
- int vendor;
- int family;
- const char *model_names[16];
+ int vendor;
+ int family;
+ const char *model_names[16];
};
/* attempt to consolidate cpu attributes */
struct cpu_dev {
- const char * c_vendor;
+ const char *c_vendor;
/* some have two possibilities for cpuid string */
- const char * c_ident[2];
+ const char *c_ident[2];
struct cpu_model_info c_models[4];
- void (*c_early_init)(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
- void (*c_init)(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c);
- void (*c_identify)(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c);
- unsigned int (*c_size_cache)(struct cpuinfo_x86 * c, unsigned int size);
- int c_x86_vendor;
+ void (*c_early_init)(struct cpuinfo_x86 *);
+ void (*c_init)(struct cpuinfo_x86 *);
+ void (*c_identify)(struct cpuinfo_x86 *);
+ unsigned int (*c_size_cache)(struct cpuinfo_x86 *, unsigned int);
+ int c_x86_vendor;
};
#define cpu_dev_register(cpu_devX) \
--
1.6.0.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/cpu.h cleanup
2009-03-22 8:16 [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/cpu.h cleanup Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-03-22 17:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-03-22 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Is it worth to move arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h data to asm/cpu.h and if
> required we can also make it private like:
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #ifndef MODULE
> private data for kernel only
> #endif
> #endif
>
> By this way we move header files to include directory. Or you have some
> better option.
There is no option at all. The header files which are in source
directories stay just where they are.
They are there for a reason. Have you even looked which files include
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h ?
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-22 17:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-22 8:16 [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/cpu.h cleanup Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-22 17:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.