From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: "Rick Jones" <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: "Bastian Blank" <waldi@debian.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Use request_firmware()
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:44:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1237859078.18617.59.camel@HP1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C836D0.1080304@hp.com>
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:26 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> Michael Chan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:14 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> >
> >>Michael Chan wrote:
> >>
> >>>May be I'll break up each firmware section into a
> >>>different file and the file name will be updated with each version.
> >>>This will allow different sections to be updated separately and older
> >>>kernels will still have access to the older firmware.
> >>
> >>Is that really necessary? It is enough "fun" finding just the one firmware file
> >>as it is.
> >
> >
> > If all the firmware sections are in the same file, much of the firmware
> > file will be duplicated in a new file when we update just one section.
>
> So? Perhaps I'm just experiencing distro pain which may not continue to exist or
> which may not matter to netdev, but when one is installing to a system that uses
> a core NIC which has firmware cast-out into "non-free" siberia, life is "fun"
> enough making sure one has the one firmware file let alone N of them. If I now
> have to make sure I have all N firmware files, and they are to be updated
> separately, either that means I have to find N packages, or the distros are going
> to package them into one "uber" package that might as well be a single firmware
> file anyway.
>
I think we can assume that distros will package firmware files (make
firmware_install) properly and not require users to install these
firmware files on their own.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 22:29 [PATCH] bnx2: Use request_firmware() Ben Hutchings
2009-03-19 23:04 ` Michael Chan
2009-03-19 23:25 ` Bastian Blank
2009-03-20 22:50 ` David Miller
2009-03-23 21:47 ` Michael Chan
2009-03-23 22:02 ` David Miller
2009-03-23 22:29 ` Bastian Blank
2009-03-23 23:24 ` Michael Chan
2009-03-24 0:14 ` Rick Jones
2009-03-24 1:11 ` Michael Chan
2009-03-24 1:26 ` Rick Jones
2009-03-24 1:44 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2009-03-24 4:27 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-03-24 7:42 ` Bastian Blank
2009-03-24 15:27 ` Michael Chan
2009-03-23 22:32 ` Bastian Blank
2009-03-23 23:28 ` Michael Chan
2009-04-01 18:01 ` Michael Chan
2009-04-02 8:05 ` David Miller
[not found] <1238778120-8132-1-git-send-email-mchan@broadcom.com>
2009-04-04 23:51 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1237859078.18617.59.camel@HP1 \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=waldi@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.