From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:11:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239203512.4557.2575.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090408145440.GN12931@elte.hu>
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 16:54 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > kernel/sched.c | 2 -
>
> Needs the ack of ... oh, never mind - this one is fine i guess ;-)
Ah, about that. This new preemption hook has slightly different
requirements than the current preempt-notifiers have (hence the new
hook), I was wondering if KVM (afaik currently the only preempt-notifier
consumer) could live with these requirements.
That is, could these be merged?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 18:02 [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: disable preemption in apply_to_pte_range Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/paravirt: remove lazy mode in interrupts Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/pvops: replace arch_enter_lazy_cpu_mode with arch_start_context_switch Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/paravirt: flush pending mmu updates on context switch Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/paravirt: finish change from lazy cpu to context switch start/end Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/paravirt: allow preemption with lazy mmu mode Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: allow preemption in apply_to_pte_range Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-07 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-07 21:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/paravirt: use percpu_ rather than __get_cpu_var Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 23:48 ` [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-08 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-04-19 10:15 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-19 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-19 23:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-20 6:02 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-08 17:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-08 18:10 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 18:30 ` [PATCH] FRV: Use <asm-generic/pgtable.h> in NOMMU mode David Howells
2009-04-08 18:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-08 18:47 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 18:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 18:47 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 20:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 21:25 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 21:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 21:48 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 22:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1239203512.4557.2575.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.