From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
tglx@linutronix.de, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: allow preemption in apply_to_pte_range
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:54:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DBCB8D.7030509@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407143833.a6841a8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> So across the aptch series the aggregate change to mm/ is nil, and this
> is wholly an x86 patch series?
>
>
Functionally, yes. I also changed the name of the
arch_enter_lazy_cpu_mode() -> arch_start_context_switch() which affects
kernel/sched.c:context_switch(), but it is just a name update (which
also required an asm-frv update, which defines its own no-op version of
the macro rather than using the default no-op one, for some reason).
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-07 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 18:02 [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: disable preemption in apply_to_pte_range Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/paravirt: remove lazy mode in interrupts Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/pvops: replace arch_enter_lazy_cpu_mode with arch_start_context_switch Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/paravirt: flush pending mmu updates on context switch Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/paravirt: finish change from lazy cpu to context switch start/end Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/paravirt: allow preemption with lazy mmu mode Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: allow preemption in apply_to_pte_range Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-07 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-07 21:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-03-27 18:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/paravirt: use percpu_ rather than __get_cpu_var Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-27 23:48 ` [PATCH] Allow preemption during lazy mmu updates Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-08 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-19 10:15 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-19 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-19 23:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-20 6:02 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-08 17:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-08 18:10 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 18:30 ` [PATCH] FRV: Use <asm-generic/pgtable.h> in NOMMU mode David Howells
2009-04-08 18:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-08 18:47 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 18:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 18:47 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 20:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 21:25 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 21:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-08 21:48 ` David Howells
2009-04-08 22:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DBCB8D.7030509@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.