From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip/aspeed: Add Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:59:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <123bc25c72b3b17c0c4154d8bd8ce3b0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210106055939.19386-5-chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
On 2021-01-06 05:59, Chia-Wei, Wang wrote:
> The eSPI interrupt controller acts as a SW IRQ number
> decoder to correctly control/dispatch interrupts of
> the eSPI peripheral, virtual wire, out-of-band, and
> flash channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Wei, Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c | 251 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/aspeed/espi.h | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> create mode 100644 include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 0ac93bfaec61..56da4a3123f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_PIC) += irq-mvebu-pic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_SEI) += irq-mvebu-sei.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_EXTIRQ) += irq-ls-extirq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI) += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o irq-aspeed-espi-ic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_EXTI) += irq-stm32-exti.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER) += qcom-irq-combiner.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_UNIPHIER_AIDET) += irq-uniphier-aidet.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8a5cc8fe3f0c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + */
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +
> +#include <soc/aspeed/espi.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/aspeed-espi-ic.h>
> +
> +#define DEVICE_NAME "aspeed-espi-ic"
> +#define IRQCHIP_NAME "eSPI-IC"
> +
> +#define ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM 7
> +
> +struct aspeed_espi_ic {
> + struct regmap *map;
> + int irq;
> + int gpio_irq;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> +};
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CHAN_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
So for each mux interrupt, you generate two endpoints interrupt,
without even checking whether they are pending? That's no good.
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int sts;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + regmap_read(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_STS, &sts);
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_PERIF_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_VW_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_OOB_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_FLASH_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_HW_RST_DEASSERT) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
This is horrible. Why can't you just use fls() in a loop?
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + }
Most of these are masking multiple events at once, which makes me
think that it really doesn't belong here...
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS);
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip aspeed_espi_ic_chip = {
> + .name = IRQCHIP_NAME,
> + .irq_enable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable,
> + .irq_disable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int
> irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &aspeed_espi_ic_chip,
> handle_simple_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops = {
> + .map = aspeed_espi_ic_map,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic;
> +
> + dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + espi_ic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*espi_ic), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!espi_ic)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + espi_ic->map = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
> + if (IS_ERR(espi_ic->map)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot get regmap\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + espi_ic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (espi_ic->irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->gpio_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + if (espi_ic->gpio_irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->gpio_irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
> ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM,
> + &aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops,
> + espi_ic);
> + if (!espi_ic->irq_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot to add irq domain\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->gpio_irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "eSPI IRQ controller initialized\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + irq_domain_remove(espi_ic->irq_domain);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-espi-ic" },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver aspeed_espi_ic_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = DEVICE_NAME,
> + .of_match_table = aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = aspeed_espi_ic_probe,
> + .remove = aspeed_espi_ic_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(aspeed_espi_ic_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c9a4f51737ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + * Author: Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
> +#define _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
[...]
If nothing else uses the data here, move it to the irqchip driver.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Chia-Wei, Wang" <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
BMC-SW@aspeedtech.com, andrew@aj.id.au, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
p.zabel@pengutronix.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip/aspeed: Add Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:59:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <123bc25c72b3b17c0c4154d8bd8ce3b0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210106055939.19386-5-chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
On 2021-01-06 05:59, Chia-Wei, Wang wrote:
> The eSPI interrupt controller acts as a SW IRQ number
> decoder to correctly control/dispatch interrupts of
> the eSPI peripheral, virtual wire, out-of-band, and
> flash channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Wei, Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c | 251 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/aspeed/espi.h | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> create mode 100644 include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 0ac93bfaec61..56da4a3123f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_PIC) += irq-mvebu-pic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_SEI) += irq-mvebu-sei.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_EXTIRQ) += irq-ls-extirq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI) += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o irq-aspeed-espi-ic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_EXTI) += irq-stm32-exti.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER) += qcom-irq-combiner.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_UNIPHIER_AIDET) += irq-uniphier-aidet.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8a5cc8fe3f0c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + */
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +
> +#include <soc/aspeed/espi.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/aspeed-espi-ic.h>
> +
> +#define DEVICE_NAME "aspeed-espi-ic"
> +#define IRQCHIP_NAME "eSPI-IC"
> +
> +#define ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM 7
> +
> +struct aspeed_espi_ic {
> + struct regmap *map;
> + int irq;
> + int gpio_irq;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> +};
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CHAN_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
So for each mux interrupt, you generate two endpoints interrupt,
without even checking whether they are pending? That's no good.
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int sts;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + regmap_read(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_STS, &sts);
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_PERIF_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_VW_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_OOB_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_FLASH_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_HW_RST_DEASSERT) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
This is horrible. Why can't you just use fls() in a loop?
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + }
Most of these are masking multiple events at once, which makes me
think that it really doesn't belong here...
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS);
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip aspeed_espi_ic_chip = {
> + .name = IRQCHIP_NAME,
> + .irq_enable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable,
> + .irq_disable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int
> irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &aspeed_espi_ic_chip,
> handle_simple_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops = {
> + .map = aspeed_espi_ic_map,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic;
> +
> + dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + espi_ic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*espi_ic), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!espi_ic)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + espi_ic->map = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
> + if (IS_ERR(espi_ic->map)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot get regmap\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + espi_ic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (espi_ic->irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->gpio_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + if (espi_ic->gpio_irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->gpio_irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
> ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM,
> + &aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops,
> + espi_ic);
> + if (!espi_ic->irq_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot to add irq domain\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->gpio_irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "eSPI IRQ controller initialized\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + irq_domain_remove(espi_ic->irq_domain);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-espi-ic" },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver aspeed_espi_ic_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = DEVICE_NAME,
> + .of_match_table = aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = aspeed_espi_ic_probe,
> + .remove = aspeed_espi_ic_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(aspeed_espi_ic_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c9a4f51737ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + * Author: Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
> +#define _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
[...]
If nothing else uses the data here, move it to the irqchip driver.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Chia-Wei, Wang" <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
BMC-SW@aspeedtech.com, andrew@aj.id.au, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au,
p.zabel@pengutronix.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip/aspeed: Add Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:59:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <123bc25c72b3b17c0c4154d8bd8ce3b0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210106055939.19386-5-chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
On 2021-01-06 05:59, Chia-Wei, Wang wrote:
> The eSPI interrupt controller acts as a SW IRQ number
> decoder to correctly control/dispatch interrupts of
> the eSPI peripheral, virtual wire, out-of-band, and
> flash channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Wei, Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c | 251 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/aspeed/espi.h | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> create mode 100644 include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 0ac93bfaec61..56da4a3123f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_PIC) += irq-mvebu-pic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_SEI) += irq-mvebu-sei.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_EXTIRQ) += irq-ls-extirq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI) += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o irq-aspeed-espi-ic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_EXTI) += irq-stm32-exti.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER) += qcom-irq-combiner.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_UNIPHIER_AIDET) += irq-uniphier-aidet.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8a5cc8fe3f0c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + */
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +
> +#include <soc/aspeed/espi.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/aspeed-espi-ic.h>
> +
> +#define DEVICE_NAME "aspeed-espi-ic"
> +#define IRQCHIP_NAME "eSPI-IC"
> +
> +#define ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM 7
> +
> +struct aspeed_espi_ic {
> + struct regmap *map;
> + int irq;
> + int gpio_irq;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> +};
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CHAN_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
So for each mux interrupt, you generate two endpoints interrupt,
without even checking whether they are pending? That's no good.
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int sts;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + regmap_read(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_STS, &sts);
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_PERIF_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_VW_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_OOB_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_FLASH_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_HW_RST_DEASSERT) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
This is horrible. Why can't you just use fls() in a loop?
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + }
Most of these are masking multiple events at once, which makes me
think that it really doesn't belong here...
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS);
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip aspeed_espi_ic_chip = {
> + .name = IRQCHIP_NAME,
> + .irq_enable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable,
> + .irq_disable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int
> irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &aspeed_espi_ic_chip,
> handle_simple_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops = {
> + .map = aspeed_espi_ic_map,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic;
> +
> + dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + espi_ic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*espi_ic), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!espi_ic)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + espi_ic->map = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
> + if (IS_ERR(espi_ic->map)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot get regmap\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + espi_ic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (espi_ic->irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->gpio_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + if (espi_ic->gpio_irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->gpio_irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
> ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM,
> + &aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops,
> + espi_ic);
> + if (!espi_ic->irq_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot to add irq domain\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->gpio_irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "eSPI IRQ controller initialized\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + irq_domain_remove(espi_ic->irq_domain);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-espi-ic" },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver aspeed_espi_ic_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = DEVICE_NAME,
> + .of_match_table = aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = aspeed_espi_ic_probe,
> + .remove = aspeed_espi_ic_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(aspeed_espi_ic_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c9a4f51737ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + * Author: Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
> +#define _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
[...]
If nothing else uses the data here, move it to the irqchip driver.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Chia-Wei, Wang" <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@aj.id.au,
tglx@linutronix.de, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, BMC-SW@aspeedtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip/aspeed: Add Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:59:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <123bc25c72b3b17c0c4154d8bd8ce3b0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210106055939.19386-5-chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
On 2021-01-06 05:59, Chia-Wei, Wang wrote:
> The eSPI interrupt controller acts as a SW IRQ number
> decoder to correctly control/dispatch interrupts of
> the eSPI peripheral, virtual wire, out-of-band, and
> flash channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Wei, Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c | 251 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/aspeed/espi.h | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> create mode 100644 include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 0ac93bfaec61..56da4a3123f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_PIC) += irq-mvebu-pic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_SEI) += irq-mvebu-sei.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_EXTIRQ) += irq-ls-extirq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI) += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += irq-aspeed-vic.o irq-aspeed-i2c-ic.o
> irq-aspeed-scu-ic.o irq-aspeed-espi-ic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_EXTI) += irq-stm32-exti.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER) += qcom-irq-combiner.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_UNIPHIER_AIDET) += irq-uniphier-aidet.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8a5cc8fe3f0c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-aspeed-espi-ic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + */
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +
> +#include <soc/aspeed/espi.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/aspeed-espi-ic.h>
> +
> +#define DEVICE_NAME "aspeed-espi-ic"
> +#define IRQCHIP_NAME "eSPI-IC"
> +
> +#define ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM 7
> +
> +struct aspeed_espi_ic {
> + struct regmap *map;
> + int irq;
> + int gpio_irq;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> +};
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> +
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CHAN_RESET);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
So for each mux interrupt, you generate two endpoints interrupt,
without even checking whether they are pending? That's no good.
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int sts;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + regmap_read(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_STS, &sts);
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_PERIF_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_VW_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_OOB_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_FLASH_BITS) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
> +
> + if (sts & ESPI_INT_STS_HW_RST_DEASSERT) {
> + irq = irq_find_mapping(espi_ic->irq_domain,
> + ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT);
> + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + }
This is horrible. Why can't you just use fls() in a loop?
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS, 0);
> + break;
> + }
Most of these are masking multiple events at once, which makes me
think that it really doesn't belong here...
> +}
> +
> +static void aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + switch (data->hwirq) {
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_CTRL_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_HW_RST_DEASSERT);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_PERIF_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_PERIF_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_VW_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_VW_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_OOB_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_OOB_BITS);
> + break;
> + case ASPEED_ESPI_IC_FLASH_EVENT:
> + regmap_update_bits(espi_ic->map, ESPI_INT_EN,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS,
> + ESPI_INT_EN_FLASH_BITS);
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip aspeed_espi_ic_chip = {
> + .name = IRQCHIP_NAME,
> + .irq_enable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_enable,
> + .irq_disable = aspeed_espi_ic_irq_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int
> irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &aspeed_espi_ic_chip,
> handle_simple_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops = {
> + .map = aspeed_espi_ic_map,
> +};
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic;
> +
> + dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + espi_ic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*espi_ic), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!espi_ic)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + espi_ic->map = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
> + if (IS_ERR(espi_ic->map)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot get regmap\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + espi_ic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (espi_ic->irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->gpio_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + if (espi_ic->gpio_irq < 0)
> + return espi_ic->gpio_irq;
> +
> + espi_ic->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
> ESPI_IC_IRQ_NUM,
> + &aspeed_espi_ic_domain_ops,
> + espi_ic);
> + if (!espi_ic->irq_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot to add irq domain\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(espi_ic->gpio_irq,
> + aspeed_espi_ic_gpio_isr,
> + espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, espi_ic);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "eSPI IRQ controller initialized\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int aspeed_espi_ic_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_espi_ic *espi_ic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + irq_domain_remove(espi_ic->irq_domain);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-espi-ic" },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver aspeed_espi_ic_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = DEVICE_NAME,
> + .of_match_table = aspeed_espi_ic_of_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = aspeed_espi_ic_probe,
> + .remove = aspeed_espi_ic_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(aspeed_espi_ic_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c9a4f51737ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/soc/aspeed/espi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + * Author: Chia-Wei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
> +#define _ASPEED_ESPI_H_
[...]
If nothing else uses the data here, move it to the irqchip driver.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 5:59 [PATCH 0/6] arm: aspeed: Add eSPI support Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: aspeed: Add eSPI controller Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 15:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-06 15:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-06 15:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-06 15:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-07 2:31 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:31 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:31 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:31 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] MAINTAINER: Add ASPEED eSPI driver entry Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: ast2600: Add eSPI reset bit Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] irqchip/aspeed: Add Aspeed eSPI interrupt controller Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 10:59 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-01-06 10:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-06 10:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-06 10:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-07 2:59 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:59 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:59 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:59 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 10:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-07 10:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-07 10:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-07 10:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-08 2:33 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-08 2:33 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-08 2:33 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-08 2:33 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] soc: aspeed: Add eSPI driver Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 7:51 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-06 7:51 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-06 7:51 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-06 7:51 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-06 15:32 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-06 15:32 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-06 15:32 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-06 15:32 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-07 2:35 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:35 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:35 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-07 2:35 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-01-08 2:59 ` Joel Stanley
2021-01-08 2:59 ` Joel Stanley
2021-01-08 2:59 ` Joel Stanley
2021-01-08 2:59 ` Joel Stanley
2021-01-08 3:09 ` Ryan Chen
2021-01-08 3:09 ` Ryan Chen
2021-01-08 3:09 ` Ryan Chen
2021-01-08 3:09 ` Ryan Chen
2021-01-06 5:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add AST2600 eSPI nodes Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
2021-01-06 5:59 ` Chia-Wei, Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=123bc25c72b3b17c0c4154d8bd8ce3b0@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.