All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUILD FAILURE 03/12] Re: Next April 21 : PPC64 randconfig [arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.o]
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:23:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240460606.6689.32.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EFDD66.3060407@oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1784 bytes --]

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 20:15 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:46 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 00:20 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >>> Reported this earlier on 14th April 2009:
> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/14/480,
> >>>
> >>> Michael,
> >>>
> >>> Any fix in sight ?
> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/14/676,
> >>>
> >>> CC      arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.o
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c: In function 'of_pci_phb_probe':
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:270: error: implicit declaration of
> >>> function 'pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic'
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:279: error: implicit declaration of
> >>> function 'scan_phb'
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:295: error: implicit declaration of
> >>> function 'pci_bus_add_devices'
> >>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.o] Error 1
> >>> make: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
> >>> ---
> > 
> > The problem above is as I said before, that the Cell Kconfig forces on
> > PPC_OF_PLATFORM_PCI even if PCI is disabled. I think the proper fix is
> > just to have CELL_NATIVE force on PCI.
> > 
> > I don't know how you got the other errors, both pci_dn.c and pci_dlpar.c
> > are only built if CONFIG_PCI is enabled, see the Makefiles.
> 
> 
> The Kconfig could be more like this:
> config PPC_CELL_NATIVE
> 	bool
> 	select PPC_CELL_COMMON
> -	select PPC_OF_PLATFORM_PCI
> +	select PPC_OF_PLATFORM_PCI if PCI

That might be better. Although I think in truth the Cell code won't
build without PCI, but we could fix that. As I said in my patch I think
we do want PCI on Cell native, so we should just select it too.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/26338/

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUILD FAILURE 03/12] Re: Next April 21 : PPC64 randconfig [arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.o]
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:23:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240460606.6689.32.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EFDD66.3060407@oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1784 bytes --]

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 20:15 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:46 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 00:20 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >>> Reported this earlier on 14th April 2009:
> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/14/480,
> >>>
> >>> Michael,
> >>>
> >>> Any fix in sight ?
> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/14/676,
> >>>
> >>> CC      arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.o
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c: In function 'of_pci_phb_probe':
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:270: error: implicit declaration of
> >>> function 'pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic'
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:279: error: implicit declaration of
> >>> function 'scan_phb'
> >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c:295: error: implicit declaration of
> >>> function 'pci_bus_add_devices'
> >>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.o] Error 1
> >>> make: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
> >>> ---
> > 
> > The problem above is as I said before, that the Cell Kconfig forces on
> > PPC_OF_PLATFORM_PCI even if PCI is disabled. I think the proper fix is
> > just to have CELL_NATIVE force on PCI.
> > 
> > I don't know how you got the other errors, both pci_dn.c and pci_dlpar.c
> > are only built if CONFIG_PCI is enabled, see the Makefiles.
> 
> 
> The Kconfig could be more like this:
> config PPC_CELL_NATIVE
> 	bool
> 	select PPC_CELL_COMMON
> -	select PPC_OF_PLATFORM_PCI
> +	select PPC_OF_PLATFORM_PCI if PCI

That might be better. Although I think in truth the Cell code won't
build without PCI, but we could fix that. As I said in my patch I think
we do want PCI on Cell native, so we should just select it too.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/26338/

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-22 16:16 [PATCH][BUILD FAILURE 03/12] Re: Next April 21 : PPC64 randconfig [arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.o] Subrata Modak
2009-04-22 16:16 ` Subrata Modak
2009-04-22 16:16 ` Subrata Modak
2009-04-23  0:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-04-23  0:43   ` Michael Ellerman
2009-04-23  3:15   ` Randy Dunlap
2009-04-23  3:15     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-04-23  4:23     ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2009-04-23  4:23       ` Michael Ellerman
2009-04-23  7:25       ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1240460606.6689.32.camel@localhost \
    --to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.