From: ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] kvm-s390: optimize float int lock: spin_lock_bh --> spin_lock
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 16:39:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241534358-32172-4-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241534358-32172-1-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
The floating interrupt lock is only taken in process context. We can
replace all spin_lock_bh with standard spin_lock calls.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++--
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 4 ++--
arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 16 ++++++++--------
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: kvm/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ kvm/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -301,13 +301,13 @@ int kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vcp
}
if ((!rc) && atomic_read(&fi->active)) {
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
list_for_each_entry(inti, &fi->list, list)
if (__interrupt_is_deliverable(vcpu, inti)) {
rc = 1;
break;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
}
if ((!rc) && (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc <
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_wait(struct kvm_vcpu
hrtimer_start(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer, ktime_set (0, sltime) , HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 5, "enabled wait via clock comparator: %llx ns", sltime);
no_timer:
- spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
+ spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
add_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
while (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.list) &&
@@ -377,18 +377,18 @@ no_timer:
!signal_pending(current)) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
vcpu_put(vcpu);
schedule();
vcpu_load(vcpu);
- spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
+ spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
}
__unset_cpu_idle(vcpu);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer);
return 0;
}
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ void kvm_s390_deliver_pending_interrupts
if (atomic_read(&fi->active)) {
do {
deliver = 0;
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(inti, n, &fi->list, list) {
if (__interrupt_is_deliverable(vcpu, inti)) {
list_del(&inti->list);
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ void kvm_s390_deliver_pending_interrupts
}
if (list_empty(&fi->list))
atomic_set(&fi->active, 0);
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
if (deliver) {
__do_deliver_interrupt(vcpu, inti);
kfree(inti);
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ int kvm_s390_inject_vm(struct kvm *kvm,
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
fi = &kvm->arch.float_int;
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
list_add_tail(&inti->list, &fi->list);
atomic_set(&fi->active, 1);
sigcpu = find_first_bit(fi->idle_mask, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ int kvm_s390_inject_vm(struct kvm *kvm,
if (waitqueue_active(&li->wq))
wake_up_interruptible(&li->wq);
spin_unlock_bh(&li->lock);
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
return 0;
}
Index: kvm/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ kvm/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -323,11 +323,11 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arch_vcpu_create(st
spin_lock_init(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcpu->arch.local_int.list);
vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int = &kvm->arch.float_int;
- spin_lock_bh(&kvm->arch.float_int.lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm->arch.float_int.lock);
kvm->arch.float_int.local_int[id] = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
init_waitqueue_head(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq);
vcpu->arch.local_int.cpuflags = &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags;
- spin_unlock_bh(&kvm->arch.float_int.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.float_int.lock);
rc = kvm_vcpu_init(vcpu, kvm, id);
if (rc)
Index: kvm/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ kvm/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -204,11 +204,11 @@ static void handle_stsi_3_2_2(struct kvm
int cpus = 0;
int n;
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
for (n = 0; n < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; n++)
if (fi->local_int[n])
cpus++;
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
/* deal with other level 3 hypervisors */
if (stsi(mem, 3, 2, 2) == -ENOSYS)
Index: kvm/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
+++ kvm/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int __sigp_sense(struct kvm_vcpu
if (cpu_addr >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
return 3; /* not operational */
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
if (fi->local_int[cpu_addr] == NULL)
rc = 3; /* not operational */
else if (atomic_read(fi->local_int[cpu_addr]->cpuflags)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int __sigp_sense(struct kvm_vcpu
*reg |= SIGP_STAT_STOPPED;
rc = 1; /* status stored */
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "sensed status of cpu %x rc %x", cpu_addr, rc);
return rc;
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int __sigp_emergency(struct kvm_v
inti->type = KVM_S390_INT_EMERGENCY;
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
li = fi->local_int[cpu_addr];
if (li == NULL) {
rc = 3; /* not operational */
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int __sigp_emergency(struct kvm_v
spin_unlock_bh(&li->lock);
rc = 0; /* order accepted */
unlock:
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "sent sigp emerg to cpu %x", cpu_addr);
return rc;
}
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int __sigp_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *
inti->type = KVM_S390_SIGP_STOP;
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
li = fi->local_int[cpu_addr];
if (li == NULL) {
rc = 3; /* not operational */
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int __sigp_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *
spin_unlock_bh(&li->lock);
rc = 0; /* order accepted */
unlock:
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "sent sigp stop to cpu %x", cpu_addr);
return rc;
}
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int __sigp_set_prefix(struct kvm_
if (!inti)
return 2; /* busy */
- spin_lock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fi->lock);
li = fi->local_int[cpu_addr];
if ((cpu_addr >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS) || (li == NULL)) {
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int __sigp_set_prefix(struct kvm_
out_li:
spin_unlock_bh(&li->lock);
out_fi:
- spin_unlock_bh(&fi->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
return rc;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-05 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 14:39 [PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390: collection of kvm-s390 fixes ehrhardt
2009-05-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] kvm-s390: Fix memory slot versus run ehrhardt
2009-05-06 12:01 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-11 13:00 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-05-11 13:15 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-11 13:46 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-05-11 14:02 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-11 14:42 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-05-11 15:01 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-12 9:15 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-05-12 11:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-12 13:33 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-05-17 22:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-20 12:05 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-05-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] kvm-s390: use hrtimer for clock wakeup from idle ehrhardt
2009-05-06 12:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-06 12:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-05-07 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-07 10:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-05-20 15:48 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-05-05 14:39 ` ehrhardt [this message]
2009-05-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] kvm-s390: Unlink vcpu on destroy ehrhardt
2009-05-06 12:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-11 13:00 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2009-05-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] kvm-s390: Sanity check on validity intercept ehrhardt
2009-05-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] kvm-s390: Verify memory in kvm run ehrhardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-12 15:21 [PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390: collection of kvm-s390 fixes - v3 ehrhardt
2009-05-12 15:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] kvm-s390: optimize float int lock: spin_lock_bh --> spin_lock ehrhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1241534358-32172-4-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.