All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: Fix potentially recursively get kvm lock
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:34:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243006469.27733.59.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090522150623.GD20823@sequoia.sous-sol.org>

On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 08:06 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Alex Williamson (alex.williamson@hp.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:09 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > KVM: workaround workqueue / deassign_host_irq deadlock
> > > 
> > > I think I'm running into the following deadlock in the kvm kernel module
> > > when trying to use device assignment:
> > > 
> > > CPU A                               CPU B
> > > kvm_vm_ioctl_deassign_dev_irq()
> > >   mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);           worker_thread()
> > >   -> kvm_deassign_irq()               ->
> > > kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_work_handler()
> > >     -> deassign_host_irq()              mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > >       -> cancel_work_sync() [blocked]
> > > 
> > > Workaround the issue by dropping kvm->lock for cancel_work_sync().
> 
> Is this still pending?

I haven't seen this particular workaround make it into a tree, however
Marcelo has been working on a set of patches to properly fix this.  Most
recent version was sent on 5/20.

Alex



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-22 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12  9:05 device-assignment deadlock Yang, Sheng
2009-05-12  9:32 ` [PATCH 1/1] KVM: Fix potentially recursively get kvm lock Sheng Yang
2009-05-12 11:55   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 14:13     ` Yang, Sheng
2009-05-12 14:30       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 15:59         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 19:44         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 21:36           ` Alex Williamson
2009-05-12 22:09             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-12 22:17               ` Alex Williamson
2009-05-22 15:06                 ` Chris Wright
2009-05-22 15:34                   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2009-05-22 15:36                     ` Chris Wright
2009-05-13  2:07               ` Yang, Sheng
2009-05-13 13:14                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-13 11:43         ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1243006469.27733.59.camel@lappy \
    --to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=sheng.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.