From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/4] ath9k: Remove dead code in rate control
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:53:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245302612-18112-1-git-send-email-vasanth@atheros.com> (raw)
ath9k rate control is based on only PER (packet error rate),
remove unused code which was intented to do rssi based rate
selection.
Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c | 163 +----------------------------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
index e66734c..a39b1a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
@@ -607,47 +607,14 @@ static u8 ath_rc_get_highest_rix(struct ath_softc *sc,
const struct ath_rate_table *rate_table,
int *is_probing)
{
- u32 dt, best_thruput, this_thruput, now_msec;
+ u32 best_thruput, this_thruput, now_msec;
u8 rate, next_rate, best_rate, maxindex, minindex;
- int8_t rssi_last, rssi_reduce = 0, index = 0;
-
- *is_probing = 0;
-
- rssi_last = median(ath_rc_priv->rssi_last,
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev,
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev2);
-
- /*
- * Age (reduce) last ack rssi based on how old it is.
- * The bizarre numbers are so the delta is 160msec,
- * meaning we divide by 16.
- * 0msec <= dt <= 25msec: don't derate
- * 25msec <= dt <= 185msec: derate linearly from 0 to 10dB
- * 185msec <= dt: derate by 10dB
- */
+ int8_t index = 0;
now_msec = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
- dt = now_msec - ath_rc_priv->rssi_time;
-
- if (dt >= 185)
- rssi_reduce = 10;
- else if (dt >= 25)
- rssi_reduce = (u8)((dt - 25) >> 4);
-
- /* Now reduce rssi_last by rssi_reduce */
- if (rssi_last < rssi_reduce)
- rssi_last = 0;
- else
- rssi_last -= rssi_reduce;
-
- /*
- * Now look up the rate in the rssi table and return it.
- * If no rates match then we return 0 (lowest rate)
- */
-
+ *is_probing = 0;
best_thruput = 0;
maxindex = ath_rc_priv->max_valid_rate-1;
-
minindex = 0;
best_rate = minindex;
@@ -687,7 +654,6 @@ static u8 ath_rc_get_highest_rix(struct ath_softc *sc,
}
rate = best_rate;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_lookup = rssi_last;
/*
* Must check the actual rate (ratekbps) to account for
@@ -977,10 +943,6 @@ static bool ath_rc_update_per(struct ath_softc *sc,
(nretry_to_per_lookup[retries] >> 3));
}
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev2 = ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev = ath_rc_priv->rssi_last;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last = tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_time = now_msec;
/*
* If we got at most one retry then increase the max rate if
@@ -1024,18 +986,9 @@ static bool ath_rc_update_per(struct ath_softc *sc,
/*
* Don't update anything. We don't know if
* this was because of collisions or poor signal.
- *
- * Later: if rssi_ack is close to
- * ath_rc_priv->state[txRate].rssi_thres and we see lots
- * of retries, then we could increase
- * ath_rc_priv->state[txRate].rssi_thres.
*/
ath_rc_priv->hw_maxretry_pktcnt = 0;
} else {
- int32_t rssi_ackAvg;
- int8_t rssi_thres;
- int8_t rssi_ack_vmin;
-
/*
* It worked with no retries. First ignore bogus (small)
* rssi_ack values.
@@ -1045,43 +998,9 @@ static bool ath_rc_update_per(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_rc_priv->hw_maxretry_pktcnt++;
}
- if (tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi <
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].rssi_ack_validmin)
- goto exit;
-
- /* Average the rssi */
- if (tx_rate != ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_rate) {
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_rate = tx_rate;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum =
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt = 0;
- }
-
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum += tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt++;
-
- if (ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt < 4)
- goto exit;
-
- rssi_ackAvg =
- (ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum + 2) / 4;
- rssi_thres =
- ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].rssi_thres;
- rssi_ack_vmin =
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].rssi_ack_validmin;
-
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum =
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt = 0;
-
- /* Now reduce the current rssi threshold */
- if ((rssi_ackAvg < rssi_thres + 2) &&
- (rssi_thres > rssi_ack_vmin)) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].rssi_thres--;
- }
-
- state_change = true;
}
}
-exit:
+
return state_change;
}
@@ -1093,11 +1012,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
struct ath_tx_info_priv *tx_info_priv,
int tx_rate, int xretries, int retries)
{
-#define CHK_RSSI(rate) \
- ((ath_rc_priv->state[(rate)].rssi_thres + \
- rate_table->info[(rate)].rssi_ack_deltamin) > \
- ath_rc_priv->state[(rate)+1].rssi_thres)
-
u32 now_msec = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
int rate;
u8 last_per;
@@ -1108,13 +1022,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
if ((tx_rate < 0) || (tx_rate > rate_table->rate_cnt))
return;
- /* To compensate for some imbalance between ctrl and ext. channel */
-
- if (WLAN_RC_PHY_40(rate_table->info[tx_rate].phy))
- tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi =
- tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi < 3 ? 0 :
- tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi - 3;
-
last_per = ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].per;
/* Update PER first */
@@ -1136,51 +1043,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_rc_priv->probe_time = now_msec;
}
- if (state_change) {
- /*
- * Make sure the rates above this have higher rssi thresholds.
- * (Note: Monotonicity is kept within the OFDM rates and
- * within the CCK rates. However, no adjustment is
- * made to keep the rssi thresholds monotonically
- * increasing between the CCK and OFDM rates.)
- */
- for (rate = tx_rate; rate < size - 1; rate++) {
- if (rate_table->info[rate+1].phy !=
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].phy)
- break;
-
- if (CHK_RSSI(rate)) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate+1].rssi_thres =
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres +
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_deltamin;
- }
- }
-
- /* Make sure the rates below this have lower rssi thresholds. */
- for (rate = tx_rate - 1; rate >= 0; rate--) {
- if (rate_table->info[rate].phy !=
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].phy)
- break;
-
- if (CHK_RSSI(rate)) {
- if (ath_rc_priv->state[rate+1].rssi_thres <
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_deltamin)
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres = 0;
- else {
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres =
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate+1].rssi_thres -
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_deltamin;
- }
-
- if (ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres <
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_validmin) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres =
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_validmin;
- }
- }
- }
- }
-
/* Make sure the rates below this have lower PER */
/* Monotonicity is kept only for rates below the current rate. */
if (ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].per < last_per) {
@@ -1205,19 +1067,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_rc_priv->state[rate].per;
}
- /* Every so often, we reduce the thresholds and
- * PER (different for CCK and OFDM). */
- if (now_msec - ath_rc_priv->rssi_down_time >=
- rate_table->rssi_reduce_interval) {
-
- for (rate = 0; rate < size; rate++) {
- if (ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres >
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_validmin)
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres -= 1;
- }
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_down_time = now_msec;
- }
-
/* Every so often, we reduce the thresholds
* and PER (different for CCK and OFDM). */
if (now_msec - ath_rc_priv->per_down_time >=
@@ -1233,7 +1082,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_debug_stat_retries(sc, tx_rate, xretries, retries,
ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].per);
-#undef CHK_RSSI
}
static int ath_rc_get_rateindex(const struct ath_rate_table *rate_table,
@@ -1369,8 +1217,6 @@ static void ath_rc_init(struct ath_softc *sc,
/* Initialize thresholds according to the global rate table */
for (i = 0 ; i < ath_rc_priv->rate_table_size; i++) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[i].rssi_thres =
- rate_table->info[i].rssi_ack_validmin;
ath_rc_priv->state[i].per = 0;
}
@@ -1631,7 +1477,6 @@ static void *ath_rate_alloc_sta(void *priv, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, gfp_t gfp
return NULL;
}
- rate_priv->rssi_down_time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
rate_priv->tx_triglevel_max = sc->sc_ah->caps.tx_triglevel_max;
return rate_priv;
--
1.5.5.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com>
To: <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
<Jouni.Malinen@atheros.com>, <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ath9k: Remove dead code in rate control
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:53:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245302612-18112-1-git-send-email-vasanth@atheros.com> (raw)
ath9k rate control is based on only PER (packet error rate),
remove unused code which was intented to do rssi based rate
selection.
Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@atheros.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c | 163 +----------------------------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
index e66734c..a39b1a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/rc.c
@@ -607,47 +607,14 @@ static u8 ath_rc_get_highest_rix(struct ath_softc *sc,
const struct ath_rate_table *rate_table,
int *is_probing)
{
- u32 dt, best_thruput, this_thruput, now_msec;
+ u32 best_thruput, this_thruput, now_msec;
u8 rate, next_rate, best_rate, maxindex, minindex;
- int8_t rssi_last, rssi_reduce = 0, index = 0;
-
- *is_probing = 0;
-
- rssi_last = median(ath_rc_priv->rssi_last,
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev,
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev2);
-
- /*
- * Age (reduce) last ack rssi based on how old it is.
- * The bizarre numbers are so the delta is 160msec,
- * meaning we divide by 16.
- * 0msec <= dt <= 25msec: don't derate
- * 25msec <= dt <= 185msec: derate linearly from 0 to 10dB
- * 185msec <= dt: derate by 10dB
- */
+ int8_t index = 0;
now_msec = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
- dt = now_msec - ath_rc_priv->rssi_time;
-
- if (dt >= 185)
- rssi_reduce = 10;
- else if (dt >= 25)
- rssi_reduce = (u8)((dt - 25) >> 4);
-
- /* Now reduce rssi_last by rssi_reduce */
- if (rssi_last < rssi_reduce)
- rssi_last = 0;
- else
- rssi_last -= rssi_reduce;
-
- /*
- * Now look up the rate in the rssi table and return it.
- * If no rates match then we return 0 (lowest rate)
- */
-
+ *is_probing = 0;
best_thruput = 0;
maxindex = ath_rc_priv->max_valid_rate-1;
-
minindex = 0;
best_rate = minindex;
@@ -687,7 +654,6 @@ static u8 ath_rc_get_highest_rix(struct ath_softc *sc,
}
rate = best_rate;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_lookup = rssi_last;
/*
* Must check the actual rate (ratekbps) to account for
@@ -977,10 +943,6 @@ static bool ath_rc_update_per(struct ath_softc *sc,
(nretry_to_per_lookup[retries] >> 3));
}
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev2 = ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last_prev = ath_rc_priv->rssi_last;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_last = tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_time = now_msec;
/*
* If we got at most one retry then increase the max rate if
@@ -1024,18 +986,9 @@ static bool ath_rc_update_per(struct ath_softc *sc,
/*
* Don't update anything. We don't know if
* this was because of collisions or poor signal.
- *
- * Later: if rssi_ack is close to
- * ath_rc_priv->state[txRate].rssi_thres and we see lots
- * of retries, then we could increase
- * ath_rc_priv->state[txRate].rssi_thres.
*/
ath_rc_priv->hw_maxretry_pktcnt = 0;
} else {
- int32_t rssi_ackAvg;
- int8_t rssi_thres;
- int8_t rssi_ack_vmin;
-
/*
* It worked with no retries. First ignore bogus (small)
* rssi_ack values.
@@ -1045,43 +998,9 @@ static bool ath_rc_update_per(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_rc_priv->hw_maxretry_pktcnt++;
}
- if (tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi <
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].rssi_ack_validmin)
- goto exit;
-
- /* Average the rssi */
- if (tx_rate != ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_rate) {
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_rate = tx_rate;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum =
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt = 0;
- }
-
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum += tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi;
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt++;
-
- if (ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt < 4)
- goto exit;
-
- rssi_ackAvg =
- (ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum + 2) / 4;
- rssi_thres =
- ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].rssi_thres;
- rssi_ack_vmin =
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].rssi_ack_validmin;
-
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum =
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_sum_cnt = 0;
-
- /* Now reduce the current rssi threshold */
- if ((rssi_ackAvg < rssi_thres + 2) &&
- (rssi_thres > rssi_ack_vmin)) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].rssi_thres--;
- }
-
- state_change = true;
}
}
-exit:
+
return state_change;
}
@@ -1093,11 +1012,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
struct ath_tx_info_priv *tx_info_priv,
int tx_rate, int xretries, int retries)
{
-#define CHK_RSSI(rate) \
- ((ath_rc_priv->state[(rate)].rssi_thres + \
- rate_table->info[(rate)].rssi_ack_deltamin) > \
- ath_rc_priv->state[(rate)+1].rssi_thres)
-
u32 now_msec = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
int rate;
u8 last_per;
@@ -1108,13 +1022,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
if ((tx_rate < 0) || (tx_rate > rate_table->rate_cnt))
return;
- /* To compensate for some imbalance between ctrl and ext. channel */
-
- if (WLAN_RC_PHY_40(rate_table->info[tx_rate].phy))
- tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi =
- tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi < 3 ? 0 :
- tx_info_priv->tx.ts_rssi - 3;
-
last_per = ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].per;
/* Update PER first */
@@ -1136,51 +1043,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_rc_priv->probe_time = now_msec;
}
- if (state_change) {
- /*
- * Make sure the rates above this have higher rssi thresholds.
- * (Note: Monotonicity is kept within the OFDM rates and
- * within the CCK rates. However, no adjustment is
- * made to keep the rssi thresholds monotonically
- * increasing between the CCK and OFDM rates.)
- */
- for (rate = tx_rate; rate < size - 1; rate++) {
- if (rate_table->info[rate+1].phy !=
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].phy)
- break;
-
- if (CHK_RSSI(rate)) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate+1].rssi_thres =
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres +
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_deltamin;
- }
- }
-
- /* Make sure the rates below this have lower rssi thresholds. */
- for (rate = tx_rate - 1; rate >= 0; rate--) {
- if (rate_table->info[rate].phy !=
- rate_table->info[tx_rate].phy)
- break;
-
- if (CHK_RSSI(rate)) {
- if (ath_rc_priv->state[rate+1].rssi_thres <
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_deltamin)
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres = 0;
- else {
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres =
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate+1].rssi_thres -
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_deltamin;
- }
-
- if (ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres <
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_validmin) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres =
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_validmin;
- }
- }
- }
- }
-
/* Make sure the rates below this have lower PER */
/* Monotonicity is kept only for rates below the current rate. */
if (ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].per < last_per) {
@@ -1205,19 +1067,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_rc_priv->state[rate].per;
}
- /* Every so often, we reduce the thresholds and
- * PER (different for CCK and OFDM). */
- if (now_msec - ath_rc_priv->rssi_down_time >=
- rate_table->rssi_reduce_interval) {
-
- for (rate = 0; rate < size; rate++) {
- if (ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres >
- rate_table->info[rate].rssi_ack_validmin)
- ath_rc_priv->state[rate].rssi_thres -= 1;
- }
- ath_rc_priv->rssi_down_time = now_msec;
- }
-
/* Every so often, we reduce the thresholds
* and PER (different for CCK and OFDM). */
if (now_msec - ath_rc_priv->per_down_time >=
@@ -1233,7 +1082,6 @@ static void ath_rc_update_ht(struct ath_softc *sc,
ath_debug_stat_retries(sc, tx_rate, xretries, retries,
ath_rc_priv->state[tx_rate].per);
-#undef CHK_RSSI
}
static int ath_rc_get_rateindex(const struct ath_rate_table *rate_table,
@@ -1369,8 +1217,6 @@ static void ath_rc_init(struct ath_softc *sc,
/* Initialize thresholds according to the global rate table */
for (i = 0 ; i < ath_rc_priv->rate_table_size; i++) {
- ath_rc_priv->state[i].rssi_thres =
- rate_table->info[i].rssi_ack_validmin;
ath_rc_priv->state[i].per = 0;
}
@@ -1631,7 +1477,6 @@ static void *ath_rate_alloc_sta(void *priv, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, gfp_t gfp
return NULL;
}
- rate_priv->rssi_down_time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
rate_priv->tx_triglevel_max = sc->sc_ah->caps.tx_triglevel_max;
return rate_priv;
--
1.5.5.1
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-18 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-18 5:23 Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan [this message]
2009-06-18 5:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] ath9k: Remove dead code in rate control Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 5:23 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/4] ath9k: Remove unused members from rate control structure Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 5:23 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 5:23 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ath9k: Use probe interval instead of rssi reduce interval Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 5:23 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 5:23 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ath9k: Nuke struct ath_tx_ratectrl_state Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 5:23 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 6:01 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-18 6:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-06-18 6:13 ` [ath9k-devel] " Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2009-06-18 6:13 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245302612-18112-1-git-send-email-vasanth@atheros.com \
--to=vasanth@atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.