All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave Young
	<hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers
	<mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:52:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246906357.11545.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090703000829.735976000-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:08 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been
> multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of
> these problems.
> 
> This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a complete fix.
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.3/01073.html
> 
> I am currently running some stress tests to make sure there are no issues with
> these patches. But, wanted to send them out for review/comments/testing
> before I head out for the long weekend.
> 
> If this patchset seems sane, the first patch in the patchset should also get
> into 30.stable.
> 

Just an update. I ran some stress test on few of my test machines over
the long weekend and havent seen any issues with this patchset.

Thanks,
Venki

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org" <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:52:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246906357.11545.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090703000829.735976000@intel.com>

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:08 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been
> multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of
> these problems.
> 
> This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a complete fix.
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.3/01073.html
> 
> I am currently running some stress tests to make sure there are no issues with
> these patches. But, wanted to send them out for review/comments/testing
> before I head out for the long weekend.
> 
> If this patchset seems sane, the first patch in the patchset should also get
> into 30.stable.
> 

Just an update. I ran some stress test on few of my test machines over
the long weekend and havent seen any issues with this patchset.

Thanks,
Venki


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-06 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-03  0:08 [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2) venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
2009-07-03  0:08 ` venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-07-03  0:08 ` [patch 1/4] cpufreq: Eliminate the recent lockdep warnings in cpufreq venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
2009-07-03  0:08   ` venkatesh.pallipadi
     [not found]   ` <20090703000923.800507000-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-03  1:06     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03  1:06       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03  2:04       ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-03  2:04         ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
     [not found]         ` <7E82351C108FA840AB1866AC776AEC4669BFEF78-osO9UTpF0URqS6EAlXoojrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-03  2:25           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03  2:25             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03 11:41     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-07-03 11:41       ` Thomas Renninger
     [not found]       ` <200907031341.19141.trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-03 14:28         ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-03 14:28           ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
     [not found]           ` <7E82351C108FA840AB1866AC776AEC4669BFF050-osO9UTpF0URqS6EAlXoojrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-06 11:19             ` Thomas Renninger
2009-07-06 11:19               ` Thomas Renninger
2009-07-03  0:08 ` [patch 2/4] cpufreq: Mark policy_rwsem as going static in cpufreq.c wont be exported venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
2009-07-03  0:08   ` venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-07-03  0:08 ` [patch 3/4] cpufreq: Cleanup locking in ondemand governor venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
2009-07-03  0:08   ` venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-07-03  0:08 ` [patch 4/4] cpufreq: Cleanup locking in conservative governor venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
2009-07-03  0:08   ` venkatesh.pallipadi
     [not found] ` <20090703000829.735976000-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-03  2:23   ` [PATCH] CPUFREQ: fix (utter) cpufreq_add_dev mess v1 Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03  2:23     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03  6:54   ` [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2) Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03  6:54     ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]     ` <20090703065427.GA32687-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-03 14:06       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03 14:06         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-07-03 14:31       ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-03 14:31         ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
     [not found]         ` <7E82351C108FA840AB1866AC776AEC4669BFF052-osO9UTpF0URqS6EAlXoojrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-03 18:48           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:48             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-06 18:52   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh [this message]
2009-07-06 18:52     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1246906357.11545.49.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers-scC8bbJcJLCw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.