All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: dedekind@infradead.org
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up some extra unused arguments in fs/ubifs/
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:59:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247837392.5690.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247815718.11353.177.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:28 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:51 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > "const struct ubifs_info *c" exists as an extra argument for major
> > function definitions under the "fs/ubifs/*" code. The reason why
> > this extra argument exists is based on assumtion that there
> > will be several key schemes. It is possible to add more than one,
> > but we use only one. When there is practically no usage of them
> > presently, they can be removed, and if needed can be added later.
> > 
> > The following patch does that by removing:
> > 1) "const struct ubifs_info *c" where it is not used/necessary,
> > 2) remove xent_key_init_hash() function, as it is also not used,
> > 3) remove data_key_init_flash() function, as it is also not used anywhere,
> 
> Fine with 2 and 3. Not fine with 1, unless it makes the code smaller
> or more optimal.

Hmmm. I see. But, it took 95% of my effort. Ok then, do you want me to
send a separate patch for 2) & 3), or, you will automatically isolate
them from the sent one.

Regards--
Subrata

> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: dedekind@infradead.org
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>,
	Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up some extra unused arguments in fs/ubifs/
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:59:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247837392.5690.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247815718.11353.177.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:28 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:51 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > "const struct ubifs_info *c" exists as an extra argument for major
> > function definitions under the "fs/ubifs/*" code. The reason why
> > this extra argument exists is based on assumtion that there
> > will be several key schemes. It is possible to add more than one,
> > but we use only one. When there is practically no usage of them
> > presently, they can be removed, and if needed can be added later.
> > 
> > The following patch does that by removing:
> > 1) "const struct ubifs_info *c" where it is not used/necessary,
> > 2) remove xent_key_init_hash() function, as it is also not used,
> > 3) remove data_key_init_flash() function, as it is also not used anywhere,
> 
> Fine with 2 and 3. Not fine with 1, unless it makes the code smaller
> or more optimal.

Hmmm. I see. But, it took 95% of my effort. Ok then, do you want me to
send a separate patch for 2) & 3), or, you will automatically isolate
them from the sent one.

Regards--
Subrata

> 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-17 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-17  6:21 [PATCH] Clean up some extra unused arguments in fs/ubifs/ Subrata Modak
2009-07-17  6:21 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-17  7:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-17  7:28   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-17 13:29   ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-07-17 13:29     ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-17 13:33     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-17 13:33       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-17 13:40       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-17 13:40         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-17 13:42         ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-17 13:42           ` Subrata Modak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1247837392.5690.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dedekind@infradead.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.