All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:00:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248084041.30899.7.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090720081054.GH7298@wotan.suse.de>

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 10:10 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Maybe I don't understand your description correctly. The TLB contains
> PMDs, but you say the HW still logically performs another translation
> step using entries in the PMD pages? If I understand that correctly,
> then generic mm does not actually care and would logically fit better
> if those entries were "linux ptes". 

They are :-)

> The pte invalidation routines
> give the virtual address, which you could use to invalidate the TLB.

For PTEs, yes, but not for those PMD entries. IE. I need the virtual
address when destroying PMDs so that I can invalidate those "indirect"
pages. PTEs are already taken care of by existing mechanisms.

Cheers,
Ben.
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:00:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248084041.30899.7.camel@pasglop> (raw)
Message-ID: <20090720100041.6YBoioQduIFtIkyKLkLV7WJTVHYd93FcKJMqJpdC52A@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090720081054.GH7298@wotan.suse.de>

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 10:10 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Maybe I don't understand your description correctly. The TLB contains
> PMDs, but you say the HW still logically performs another translation
> step using entries in the PMD pages? If I understand that correctly,
> then generic mm does not actually care and would logically fit better
> if those entries were "linux ptes". 

They are :-)

> The pte invalidation routines
> give the virtual address, which you could use to invalidate the TLB.

For PTEs, yes, but not for those PMD entries. IE. I need the virtual
address when destroying PMDs so that I can invalidate those "indirect"
pages. PTEs are already taken care of by existing mechanisms.

Cheers,
Ben.
 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@tiscali.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:00:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248084041.30899.7.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090720081054.GH7298@wotan.suse.de>

On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 10:10 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> Maybe I don't understand your description correctly. The TLB contains
> PMDs, but you say the HW still logically performs another translation
> step using entries in the PMD pages? If I understand that correctly,
> then generic mm does not actually care and would logically fit better
> if those entries were "linux ptes". 

They are :-)

> The pte invalidation routines
> give the virtual address, which you could use to invalidate the TLB.

For PTEs, yes, but not for those PMD entries. IE. I need the virtual
address when destroying PMDs so that I can invalidate those "indirect"
pages. PTEs are already taken care of by existing mechanisms.

Cheers,
Ben.
 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-20 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-15  7:49 [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-15  7:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-15  7:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-15  7:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-15 13:56 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-15 13:56   ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-15 13:56   ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-16  1:54   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-16  1:54     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-16  1:54     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  8:10     ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  8:10       ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  8:10       ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-20 10:00       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-07-20 10:00         ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 10:00         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 10:38         ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20 10:38           ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20 10:38           ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-21  0:02           ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-21  0:02             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-21  0:02             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-21  7:05             ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-21  7:05               ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-21  7:05               ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  7:11   ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  7:11     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  7:11     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  7:48     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-20  7:48       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-20  7:48       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-20  8:05     ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  8:05       ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  8:05       ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  9:59       ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 10:39         ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20 10:39           ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20 10:39           ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-22 16:31     ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Linus Torvalds
2009-07-22 16:31       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-22 16:31       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  0:53       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-23  0:53         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-23  0:53         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-23  0:59         ` Kumar Gala
2009-07-23  0:59           ` Kumar Gala
2009-07-23  0:59           ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Kumar Gala
2009-07-27 19:11         ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 19:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 19:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 21:35           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-27 21:35             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-27 21:35             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:17           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:25             ` Paul Mundt
2009-07-28  0:25               ` Paul Mundt
2009-07-28  0:25               ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Paul Mundt
2009-07-28  0:41               ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28  0:41                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28  0:41                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-16  1:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-07-16  1:36   ` Michael Ellerman
2009-07-16  1:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-16  1:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-16  1:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 12:46 ` David Howells
2009-07-20 12:46   ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() David Howells
2009-07-20 12:46   ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1248084041.30899.7.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hugh@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.