From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
general-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org,
akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:43:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253198593.14935.20.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adafxalejiq.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 07:24 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Anton Blanchard suggested a while back that this might be integrated
> > with perf-counters, since perf-counters already does mmap() tracking and
> > also provides events through an mmap()'ed buffer.
> >
> > Has anybody looked into this?
>
> I didn't see the original suggestion. Certainly hooking in to existing
> infrastructure for user/kernel communication would be good.
>
> The fit doesn't seem great to me, although I am rather naive about perf
> counters. The problem that ummunotify is trying to solve is to let an
> app say 'for these 1000 address ranges (that possibly only cover a small
> part of my total address space), please let me know when the mappings
> are invalidated for any reason'.
>
> So getting those events in the kernel is no problem -- we have the MMU
> notifier hooks that tell us exactly what we need to know. The issue is
> purely the way userspace registers interest in address ranges, and how
> to kernel returns the events.
>
> For perf counters it seems that one would have to create a new counter
> for each address range... is that correct? And also I don't know if
> perf counter has an analog for the fast path optimization that
> ummunotify provides via a mmap'ed generation counter (a quick way for
> userspace to see 'nothing happened since last time you checked').
You're right in that perf-counter currently doesn't provide a way to
specify these ranges, we simply track all mmap() traffic.
The thing is that mmap() data is basically a side channel. For your
usage you'd basically have to open a NOP counter and only observe the
mmap data.
We could look at ways of adding ranges..
We do have a means of detecting if new data is available, we keep a data
head index. If that moves, you've got new stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:43:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253198593.14935.20.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adafxalejiq.fsf@cisco.com>
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 07:24 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Anton Blanchard suggested a while back that this might be integrated
> > with perf-counters, since perf-counters already does mmap() tracking and
> > also provides events through an mmap()'ed buffer.
> >
> > Has anybody looked into this?
>
> I didn't see the original suggestion. Certainly hooking in to existing
> infrastructure for user/kernel communication would be good.
>
> The fit doesn't seem great to me, although I am rather naive about perf
> counters. The problem that ummunotify is trying to solve is to let an
> app say 'for these 1000 address ranges (that possibly only cover a small
> part of my total address space), please let me know when the mappings
> are invalidated for any reason'.
>
> So getting those events in the kernel is no problem -- we have the MMU
> notifier hooks that tell us exactly what we need to know. The issue is
> purely the way userspace registers interest in address ranges, and how
> to kernel returns the events.
>
> For perf counters it seems that one would have to create a new counter
> for each address range... is that correct? And also I don't know if
> perf counter has an analog for the fast path optimization that
> ummunotify provides via a mmap'ed generation counter (a quick way for
> userspace to see 'nothing happened since last time you checked').
You're right in that perf-counter currently doesn't provide a way to
specify these ranges, we simply track all mmap() traffic.
The thing is that mmap() data is basically a side channel. For your
usage you'd basically have to open a NOP counter and only observe the
mmap data.
We could look at ways of adding ranges..
We do have a means of detecting if new data is available, we keep a data
head index. If that moves, you've got new stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 4:38 [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 4:38 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-15 11:34 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20090915113434.GF1328-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-15 14:57 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2009-09-15 14:57 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <ada7hw0gsqz.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-28 20:49 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-28 20:49 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20090928204923.GA1960-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-28 21:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-09-28 21:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <aday6omhz9d.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-11 5:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 5:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 6:03 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 6:03 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adatyzahvbm.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-11 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <20090911150552.DB68.A69D9226-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-11 16:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-09-11 16:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-09-11 6:15 ` Brice Goglin
[not found] ` <4AA9EAF7.5010401-MZpvjPyXg2s@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-11 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 6:22 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 6:22 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 6:40 ` [ofa-general] " Jason Gunthorpe
2009-09-11 6:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20090911064019.GZ4973-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-11 16:58 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 16:58 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adaljklifkt.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-15 7:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-15 7:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-15 8:27 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-15 8:27 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-15 12:38 ` Jeff Squyres
2009-09-15 12:38 ` Jeff Squyres
2009-09-16 16:30 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-16 16:30 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-16 16:40 ` [ofa-general] " Linus Torvalds
2009-09-16 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-17 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 14:24 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adafxalejiq.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 14:32 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-17 14:32 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adaab0tej5c.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 15:03 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-17 15:03 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adazl8td35u.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-17 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 15:45 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-17 15:45 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adatyz1d17q.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-18 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-18 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-29 17:13 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-29 17:13 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20090929171332.GD14405-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-30 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20090930094456.GD24621-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-30 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-09-30 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20090930160232.GZ22310-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-12 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-12 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20091012181944.GF17138-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-12 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-12 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-12 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20091012202046.GA7648-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 4:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-13 4:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-13 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20091013064006.GC9470-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 16:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-13 16:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-13 5:43 ` Brice Goglin
[not found] ` <4AD41373.8010108-MZpvjPyXg2s@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 17:06 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-30 17:06 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-02 16:32 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-02 16:32 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <ada3a61rc3j.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-02 20:45 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-02 20:45 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-07 22:34 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-07 22:34 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <ada3a5uq1dk.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-12 17:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-12 17:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-09-17 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253198593.14935.20.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=anton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=general-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.