* BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"?
@ 2013-11-02 10:27 Robert P. J. Day
2013-11-03 20:49 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2013-11-02 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yocto discussion list
(i can see it's going to be that kind of weekend.) ref manual reads:
BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1"
but some layers define:
meta-linaro/meta-aarch64/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "true"
meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "true"
meta-linaro/meta-linaro/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "true"
poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY ?= "true"
so general question(s) -- is it understood that "1" and "true" are
equivalent? should there be a standard? should the ref manual be
enhanced, or should the above layers clean themselves up?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"?
2013-11-02 10:27 BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2013-11-03 20:49 ` Khem Raj
2013-11-04 18:47 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2013-11-03 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
> (i can see it's going to be that kind of weekend.) ref manual reads:
>
> BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1"
>
> but some layers define:
>
> meta-linaro/meta-aarch64/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "true"
> meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "true"
> meta-linaro/meta-linaro/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "true"
> poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY ?= "true"
>
> so general question(s) -- is it understood that "1" and "true" are
> equivalent? should there be a standard? should the ref manual be
> enhanced, or should the above layers clean themselves up?
They are all correct. Accepted values are
"1", "yes", "true"
>
> rday
>
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
> http://crashcourse.ca
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"?
2013-11-03 20:49 ` Khem Raj
@ 2013-11-04 18:47 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-11-04 18:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-11-04 19:29 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2013-11-04 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj, Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: yocto
On Sunday 03 November 2013 12:49:16 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
wrote:
> > (i can see it's going to be that kind of weekend.) ref manual reads:
> > BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1"
> >
> > but some layers define:
> >
> > meta-linaro/meta-aarch64/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
> > "true"
> > meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARN
> > ONLY = "true"
> > meta-linaro/meta-linaro/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
> > "true"
> > poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY
> > ?= "true"
> >
> > so general question(s) -- is it understood that "1" and "true" are
> > equivalent? should there be a standard? should the ref manual be
> > enhanced, or should the above layers clean themselves up?
>
> They are all correct. Accepted values are
>
> "1", "yes", "true"
Note - for this variable only. For consistency with other "boolean" type
variables I'd suggest sticking to "1".
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"?
2013-11-04 18:47 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2013-11-04 18:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-11-04 19:02 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-11-04 19:29 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2013-11-04 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: yocto
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Sunday 03 November 2013 12:49:16 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> > > (i can see it's going to be that kind of weekend.) ref manual reads:
> > > BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1"
> > >
> > > but some layers define:
> > >
> > > meta-linaro/meta-aarch64/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
> > > "true"
> > > meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARN
> > > ONLY = "true"
> > > meta-linaro/meta-linaro/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
> > > "true"
> > > poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY
> > > ?= "true"
> > >
> > > so general question(s) -- is it understood that "1" and "true" are
> > > equivalent? should there be a standard? should the ref manual be
> > > enhanced, or should the above layers clean themselves up?
> >
> > They are all correct. Accepted values are
> >
> > "1", "yes", "true"
>
> Note - for this variable only. For consistency with other "boolean" type
> variables I'd suggest sticking to "1".
wait ... so those three synonyms are equivalent for only that one
variable? ewwwwwwwwww ...
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"?
2013-11-04 18:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
@ 2013-11-04 19:02 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2013-11-04 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: yocto
On Monday 04 November 2013 13:54:24 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 November 2013 12:49:16 Khem Raj wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > (i can see it's going to be that kind of weekend.) ref manual reads:
> > > > BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1"
> > > >
> > > > but some layers define:
> > > >
> > > > meta-linaro/meta-aarch64/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
> > > > "true"
> > > > meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_W
> > > > ARN
> > > > ONLY = "true"
> > > > meta-linaro/meta-linaro/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
> > > > "true"
> > > > poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONL
> > > > Y
> > > > ?= "true"
> > > >
> > > > so general question(s) -- is it understood that "1" and "true" are
> > > > equivalent? should there be a standard? should the ref manual be
> > > > enhanced, or should the above layers clean themselves up?
> > >
> > > They are all correct. Accepted values are
> > >
> > > "1", "yes", "true"
> >
> > Note - for this variable only. For consistency with other "boolean" type
> > variables I'd suggest sticking to "1".
>
> wait ... so those three synonyms are equivalent for only that one
> variable? ewwwwwwwwww ...
That's the way it has been coded in this instance I'm afraid, yes.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"?
2013-11-04 18:47 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-11-04 18:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
@ 2013-11-04 19:29 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2013-11-04 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org discussion
On Nov 4, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 03 November 2013 12:49:16 Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
>>> (i can see it's going to be that kind of weekend.) ref manual reads:
>>> BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1"
>>>
>>> but some layers define:
>>>
>>> meta-linaro/meta-aarch64/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
>>> "true"
>>> meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARN
>>> ONLY = "true"
>>> meta-linaro/meta-linaro/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY =
>>> "true"
>>> poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY
>>> ?= "true"
>>>
>>> so general question(s) -- is it understood that "1" and "true" are
>>> equivalent? should there be a standard? should the ref manual be
>>> enhanced, or should the above layers clean themselves up?
>>
>> They are all correct. Accepted values are
>>
>> "1", "yes", "true"
>
> Note - for this variable only. For consistency with other "boolean" type
> variables I'd suggest sticking to "1”.
may be it should be deprecated slowly for other values.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-04 19:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-02 10:27 BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" or "true"? Robert P. J. Day
2013-11-03 20:49 ` Khem Raj
2013-11-04 18:47 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-11-04 18:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
2013-11-04 19:02 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-11-04 19:29 ` Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.