* [PATCH] Print error if VG already exist.
@ 2009-12-03 14:31 Milan Broz
2009-12-03 17:15 ` Dave Wysochanski
2009-12-03 20:13 ` Petr Rockai
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Milan Broz @ 2009-12-03 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
This test have to be moved because of new vg read error handling.
Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
---
tools/vgcreate.c | 9 +++++++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/vgcreate.c b/tools/vgcreate.c
index b1b0c63..8aef7a2 100644
--- a/tools/vgcreate.c
+++ b/tools/vgcreate.c
@@ -55,8 +55,13 @@ int vgcreate(struct cmd_context *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
/* Create the new VG */
vg = vg_create(cmd, vp_new.vg_name);
- if (vg_read_error(vg))
- goto_bad;
+ if (vg_read_error(vg)) {
+ if (vg_read_error(vg) == FAILED_EXIST)
+ log_error("A volume group called %s already exists.", vp_new.vg_name);
+ else
+ log_error("Can't get lock for %s", vp_new.vg_name);
+ goto bad;
+ }
if (!vg_set_extent_size(vg, vp_new.extent_size) ||
!vg_set_max_lv(vg, vp_new.max_lv) ||
--
1.6.5.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Print error if VG already exist.
2009-12-03 14:31 [PATCH] Print error if VG already exist Milan Broz
@ 2009-12-03 17:15 ` Dave Wysochanski
2009-12-03 20:13 ` Petr Rockai
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Wysochanski @ 2009-12-03 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 15:31 +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> This test have to be moved because of new vg read error handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/vgcreate.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/vgcreate.c b/tools/vgcreate.c
> index b1b0c63..8aef7a2 100644
> --- a/tools/vgcreate.c
> +++ b/tools/vgcreate.c
> @@ -55,8 +55,13 @@ int vgcreate(struct cmd_context *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
>
> /* Create the new VG */
> vg = vg_create(cmd, vp_new.vg_name);
> - if (vg_read_error(vg))
> - goto_bad;
> + if (vg_read_error(vg)) {
> + if (vg_read_error(vg) == FAILED_EXIST)
> + log_error("A volume group called %s already exists.", vp_new.vg_name);
> + else
> + log_error("Can't get lock for %s", vp_new.vg_name);
> + goto bad;
> + }
>
> if (!vg_set_extent_size(vg, vp_new.extent_size) ||
> !vg_set_max_lv(vg, vp_new.max_lv) ||
Ack.
Some more cleanup probably warranted but another time and there are
already FIXMEs in the code.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Print error if VG already exist.
2009-12-03 14:31 [PATCH] Print error if VG already exist Milan Broz
2009-12-03 17:15 ` Dave Wysochanski
@ 2009-12-03 20:13 ` Petr Rockai
2009-12-03 20:59 ` Dave Wysochanski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr Rockai @ 2009-12-03 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> writes:
> This test have to be moved because of new vg read error handling.
> @@ -55,8 +55,13 @@ int vgcreate(struct cmd_context *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
>
> /* Create the new VG */
> vg = vg_create(cmd, vp_new.vg_name);
> - if (vg_read_error(vg))
> - goto_bad;
> + if (vg_read_error(vg)) {
> + if (vg_read_error(vg) == FAILED_EXIST)
> + log_error("A volume group called %s already exists.", vp_new.vg_name);
> + else
> + log_error("Can't get lock for %s", vp_new.vg_name);
> + goto bad;
> + }
This is suspicious. In vg_create:
if ((vg = vg_read_internal(cmd, vg_name, NULL, &consistent))) {
log_error("A volume group called '%s' already exists.", vg_name);
unlock_and_release_vg(cmd, vg, vg_name);
return _vg_make_handle(cmd, NULL, FAILED_EXIST);
}
So the code you are adding should not be needed, at least not for the
EXIST case.
Hmm. Ok, I see that the code is actually broken, since what fails is
already vg_lock_newname. I'd argue that it should be vg_lock_newname
that should be printing this, not vgcreate. Like this:
diff -u -p -r1.299 metadata.c
--- lib/metadata/metadata.c 24 Nov 2009 22:55:56 -0000 1.299
+++ lib/metadata/metadata.c 3 Dec 2009 20:11:56 -0000
@@ -3507,6 +3507,7 @@ uint32_t vg_lock_newname(struct cmd_cont
/* Found vgname so cannot reserve. */
unlock_vg(cmd, vgname);
+ log_error("A volume group called '%s' already exists.", vg_name);
return FAILED_EXIST;
}
Yours,
Petr.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Print error if VG already exist.
2009-12-03 20:13 ` Petr Rockai
@ 2009-12-03 20:59 ` Dave Wysochanski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Wysochanski @ 2009-12-03 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 21:13 +0100, Petr Rockai wrote:
> Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> writes:
> > This test have to be moved because of new vg read error handling.
>
> > @@ -55,8 +55,13 @@ int vgcreate(struct cmd_context *cmd, int argc, char **argv)
> >
> > /* Create the new VG */
> > vg = vg_create(cmd, vp_new.vg_name);
> > - if (vg_read_error(vg))
> > - goto_bad;
> > + if (vg_read_error(vg)) {
> > + if (vg_read_error(vg) == FAILED_EXIST)
> > + log_error("A volume group called %s already exists.", vp_new.vg_name);
> > + else
> > + log_error("Can't get lock for %s", vp_new.vg_name);
> > + goto bad;
> > + }
>
> This is suspicious. In vg_create:
>
> if ((vg = vg_read_internal(cmd, vg_name, NULL, &consistent))) {
> log_error("A volume group called '%s' already exists.", vg_name);
> unlock_and_release_vg(cmd, vg, vg_name);
> return _vg_make_handle(cmd, NULL, FAILED_EXIST);
> }
>
> So the code you are adding should not be needed, at least not for the
> EXIST case.
>
> Hmm. Ok, I see that the code is actually broken, since what fails is
> already vg_lock_newname. I'd argue that it should be vg_lock_newname
> that should be printing this, not vgcreate. Like this:
>
> diff -u -p -r1.299 metadata.c
> --- lib/metadata/metadata.c 24 Nov 2009 22:55:56 -0000 1.299
> +++ lib/metadata/metadata.c 3 Dec 2009 20:11:56 -0000
> @@ -3507,6 +3507,7 @@ uint32_t vg_lock_newname(struct cmd_cont
>
> /* Found vgname so cannot reserve. */
> unlock_vg(cmd, vgname);
> + log_error("A volume group called '%s' already exists.", vg_name);
> return FAILED_EXIST;
> }
>
Unfortunately this will add extraneous messages / errors to some vgsplit
operations as a check for existence is not always a command error. Plus
vg_lock_newname only returns codes in the other paths and it would be
good to stay consistent (log_error() in all error paths or none of them
and let caller decide).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-03 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-03 14:31 [PATCH] Print error if VG already exist Milan Broz
2009-12-03 17:15 ` Dave Wysochanski
2009-12-03 20:13 ` Petr Rockai
2009-12-03 20:59 ` Dave Wysochanski
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.