From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:37:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1261129077.27920.1041.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091218065755.GA23808@elte.hu>
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 07:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> > Since RT has since grown its own load-balancer which is totally independent
> > from CFS, we can remove some of the left-overs from back when.
> >
> > Gets rid of the ->load_balance and ->move_one_task sched_class calls and
> > removed the rq_iterator stuff.
> >
> > Also carries a lock-break recently found wanted by -rt.
> >
> > Compile tested with CGROUP/SMP/UP and booted on x86_64-SMP.
> >
> > include/linux/sched.h | 8 -
> > kernel/sched.c | 1945 ++---------------------------------------------
> > kernel/sched_fair.c | 1778 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > kernel/sched_idletask.c | 21 -
> > kernel/sched_rt.c | 20 -
> > 5 files changed, 1805 insertions(+), 1967 deletions(-)
>
> Nice cleanups! I think we want to delay its application to the scheduler tree
> for a week or two, to not interact with any urgent fixes for the .33 code.
Sure, I'll keep them around until then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 18:50 [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move load balance code into sched_fair.c Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Remove the sched_class load_balance methods Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator usage from load_balance_fair Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator from move_one_task Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Remove from fwd decls Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched: Add a lock break for PREEMPT=y Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Ingo Molnar
2009-12-18 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 7/6][RFC] sched: unify load_balance{,_newidle}() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 4:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 10:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 17:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 8/6][RFC] sched: Remove load_balance_newidle() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1261129077.27920.1041.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.