From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator from move_one_task
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091217185430.502721509@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091217185021.684424629@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-4.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5414 bytes --]
Again, since we only iterate the fair class, remove the abstraction.
Since this is the last user of the rq_iterator, remove all that too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 146 ++++++++++++----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1814,54 +1814,6 @@ static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq
* Fair scheduling class load-balancing methods:
*/
-/*
- * Load-balancing iterator. Note: while the runqueue stays locked
- * during the whole iteration, the current task might be
- * dequeued so the iterator has to be dequeue-safe. Here we
- * achieve that by always pre-iterating before returning
- * the current task:
- */
-static struct task_struct *
-__load_balance_iterator(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct list_head *next)
-{
- struct task_struct *p = NULL;
- struct sched_entity *se;
-
- if (next == &cfs_rq->tasks)
- return NULL;
-
- se = list_entry(next, struct sched_entity, group_node);
- p = task_of(se);
- cfs_rq->balance_iterator = next->next;
-
- return p;
-}
-
-static struct task_struct *load_balance_start_fair(void *arg)
-{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = arg;
-
- return __load_balance_iterator(cfs_rq, cfs_rq->tasks.next);
-}
-
-static struct task_struct *load_balance_next_fair(void *arg)
-{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = arg;
-
- return __load_balance_iterator(cfs_rq, cfs_rq->balance_iterator);
-}
-
-/*
- * runqueue iterator, to support SMP load-balancing between different
- * scheduling classes, without having to expose their internal data
- * structures to the load-balancing proper:
- */
-struct rq_iterator {
- void *arg;
- struct task_struct *(*start)(void *);
- struct task_struct *(*next)(void *);
-};
-
static unsigned long
balance_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
unsigned long max_load_move, struct sched_domain *sd,
@@ -1929,42 +1881,6 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, in
}
#endif
-static int
-iter_move_one_task(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
- struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
- struct rq_iterator *iterator);
-
-/*
- * move_one_task tries to move exactly one task from busiest to this_rq, as
- * part of active balancing operations within "domain".
- * Returns 1 if successful and 0 otherwise.
- *
- * Called with both runqueues locked.
- */
-static int
-move_one_task(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
- struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
-{
- struct cfs_rq *busy_cfs_rq;
- struct rq_iterator cfs_rq_iterator;
-
- cfs_rq_iterator.start = load_balance_start_fair;
- cfs_rq_iterator.next = load_balance_next_fair;
-
- for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(busiest, busy_cfs_rq) {
- /*
- * pass busy_cfs_rq argument into
- * load_balance_[start|next]_fair iterators
- */
- cfs_rq_iterator.arg = busy_cfs_rq;
- if (iter_move_one_task(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest, sd, idle,
- &cfs_rq_iterator))
- return 1;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* pull_task - move a task from a remote runqueue to the local runqueue.
* Both runqueues must be locked.
@@ -2029,6 +1945,42 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct
return 1;
}
+/*
+ * move_one_task tries to move exactly one task from busiest to this_rq, as
+ * part of active balancing operations within "domain".
+ * Returns 1 if successful and 0 otherwise.
+ *
+ * Called with both runqueues locked.
+ */
+static int
+move_one_task(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
+ struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p, *n;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+ int pinned = 0;
+
+ for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(busiest, cfs_rq) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &cfs_rq->tasks, se.group_node) {
+
+ if (!can_migrate_task(p, busiest, this_cpu,
+ sd, idle, &pinned))
+ continue;
+
+ pull_task(busiest, p, this_rq, this_cpu);
+ /*
+ * Right now, this is only the second place pull_task()
+ * is called, so we can safely collect pull_task()
+ * stats here rather than inside pull_task().
+ */
+ schedstat_inc(sd, lb_gained[idle]);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static unsigned long
balance_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
unsigned long max_load_move, struct sched_domain *sd,
@@ -2125,32 +2077,6 @@ static int move_tasks(struct rq *this_rq
return total_load_moved > 0;
}
-static int
-iter_move_one_task(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
- struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
- struct rq_iterator *iterator)
-{
- struct task_struct *p = iterator->start(iterator->arg);
- int pinned = 0;
-
- while (p) {
- if (can_migrate_task(p, busiest, this_cpu, sd, idle, &pinned)) {
- pull_task(busiest, p, this_rq, this_cpu);
- /*
- * Right now, this is only the second place pull_task()
- * is called, so we can safely collect pull_task()
- * stats here rather than inside pull_task().
- */
- schedstat_inc(sd, lb_gained[idle]);
-
- return 1;
- }
- p = iterator->next(iterator->arg);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/********** Helpers for find_busiest_group ************************/
/*
* sd_lb_stats - Structure to store the statistics of a sched_domain
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 18:50 [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move load balance code into sched_fair.c Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Remove the sched_class load_balance methods Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator usage from load_balance_fair Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Remove from fwd decls Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched: Add a lock break for PREEMPT=y Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Ingo Molnar
2009-12-18 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 7/6][RFC] sched: unify load_balance{,_newidle}() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 4:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 10:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 17:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 8/6][RFC] sched: Remove load_balance_newidle() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091217185430.502721509@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.