From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] partial revert to show stack information in /proc/<pid>/status
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:05:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262441109.9108.20.camel@wall-e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f11576a1001012153qec2ea0eo7a2762386ed22273@mail.gmail.com>
As announce here is the patch to partial revert the show stack
information patch due a not accepted performance regression. It will be
now show only the current stack usage, not the high water mark.
The path is only partial reverted because i need the other parts to do
it in an other way.
There are now two possibilities solutions:
- create a new /proc/<pid>/stackinfo entry, which provides the reverted
information and maybe others like the sigaltstack.
- create a user space tool which use /proc/<pid>/pagemap
In both cases the information of task->stack_start and the KSTK_ESP is
needed.
It will be also needed for an enhancement of the oom handler, where i
free unused stack pages (the pages before the stack pointer) under high
memory pressure. This is currently under work.
Andrew please apply this patch to 2.6.34-rc* tree.
Greetings,
Stefani
Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
---
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 2
fs/proc/array.c | 87 ++-----------------------------------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
diff -u -N -r -p linux-2.6.33-rc2.orig/fs/proc/array.c linux-2.6.33-rc2.new/fs/proc/array.c
--- linux-2.6.33-rc2.orig/fs/proc/array.c 2009-12-27 23:37:04.817427024 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.33-rc2.new/fs/proc/array.c 2010-01-02 14:36:53.794188418 +0100
@@ -327,93 +327,20 @@ static inline void task_context_switch_c
p->nivcsw);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
-
-struct stack_stats {
- struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- unsigned long startpage;
- unsigned long usage;
-};
-
-static int stack_usage_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
- unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
+static inline void task_show_stack_usage(struct seq_file *m,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
- struct stack_stats *ss = walk->private;
- struct vm_area_struct *vma = ss->vma;
- pte_t *pte, ptent;
- spinlock_t *ptl;
- int ret = 0;
-
- pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
- for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
- ptent = *pte;
+ unsigned long usage;
+ if (task->mm) {
#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
- if (pte_present(ptent) || is_swap_pte(ptent))
- ss->usage = addr - ss->startpage + PAGE_SIZE;
+ usage = KSTK_ESP(task) - task->stack_start;
#else
- if (pte_present(ptent) || is_swap_pte(ptent)) {
- ss->usage = ss->startpage - addr + PAGE_SIZE;
- pte++;
- ret = 1;
- break;
- }
+ usage = task->stack_start - KSTK_ESP(task);
#endif
+ seq_printf(m, "Stack usage:\t%lu kB\n", (usage + 1023) >> 10);
}
- pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
- cond_resched();
- return ret;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long get_stack_usage_in_bytes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
- struct task_struct *task)
-{
- struct stack_stats ss;
- struct mm_walk stack_walk = {
- .pmd_entry = stack_usage_pte_range,
- .mm = vma->vm_mm,
- .private = &ss,
- };
-
- if (!vma->vm_mm || is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
- return 0;
-
- ss.vma = vma;
- ss.startpage = task->stack_start & PAGE_MASK;
- ss.usage = 0;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
- walk_page_range(KSTK_ESP(task) & PAGE_MASK, vma->vm_end,
- &stack_walk);
-#else
- walk_page_range(vma->vm_start, (KSTK_ESP(task) & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE,
- &stack_walk);
-#endif
- return ss.usage;
-}
-
-static inline void task_show_stack_usage(struct seq_file *m,
- struct task_struct *task)
-{
- struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
-
- if (mm) {
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- vma = find_vma(mm, task->stack_start);
- if (vma)
- seq_printf(m, "Stack usage:\t%lu kB\n",
- get_stack_usage_in_bytes(vma, task) >> 10);
-
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- mmput(mm);
- }
-}
-#else
-static void task_show_stack_usage(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
-{
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
static void task_cpus_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
{
diff -u -N -r -p linux-2.6.33-rc2.orig/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt linux-2.6.33-rc2.new/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
--- linux-2.6.33-rc2.orig/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt 2009-12-27 23:37:01.098310709 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.33-rc2.new/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt 2010-01-02 14:30:39.059150340 +0100
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ Table 1-2: Contents of the statm files (
Mems_allowed_list Same as previous, but in "list format"
voluntary_ctxt_switches number of voluntary context switches
nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches number of non voluntary context switches
- Stack usage: stack usage high water mark (round up to page size)
+ Stack usage: stack usage in kB
..............................................................................
Table 1-3: Contents of the statm files (as of 2.6.8-rc3)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-02 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-31 14:12 [PATCH] proc: revert to show stack information in /proc/{pid}/status KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-31 15:48 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-01 14:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-01 15:10 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-01 22:05 ` Samuel Thibault
2010-01-01 22:21 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-02 5:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-02 8:26 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-02 14:05 ` Stefani Seibold [this message]
2010-01-05 5:24 ` [PATCH] partial revert to show stack information in /proc/<pid>/status KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-02 1:42 ` [PATCH] proc: revert to show stack information in /proc/{pid}/status Andi Kleen
2010-01-01 15:49 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-01 16:09 ` Stefani Seibold
2010-01-07 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-08 0:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-08 0:34 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262441109.9108.20.camel@wall-e \
--to=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.