* trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree
@ 2010-01-09 8:51 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-01-09 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi!
It is great to have all changes merged, but I ran into some trouble:
1) mmc.h was missing.
2) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c: In function 'msm_chg_rpc_connect':
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
function 'machine_is_msm7201a_surf'
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
function 'machine_is_msm7x27_surf'
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:157: error: implicit declaration of
function 'machine_is_qsd8x50_surf'
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o] Error 1
(I provided missing inlines)
3) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.o
arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:31:35: error: linux/remote_spinlock.h:
No such file or directory
arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:106: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'pll_lock'
(I'm currently stuck here).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree
@ 2010-01-09 8:51 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-01-09 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arve Hj?nnev?g, kernel list, linux-arm-kernel, Brian Swetland,
Daniel Walker, Iliyan Malchev
Hi!
It is great to have all changes merged, but I ran into some trouble:
1) mmc.h was missing.
2) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c: In function 'msm_chg_rpc_connect':
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
function 'machine_is_msm7201a_surf'
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
function 'machine_is_msm7x27_surf'
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:157: error: implicit declaration of
function 'machine_is_qsd8x50_surf'
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o] Error 1
(I provided missing inlines)
3) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.o
arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:31:35: error: linux/remote_spinlock.h:
No such file or directory
arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:106: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'pll_lock'
(I'm currently stuck here).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree
2010-01-09 8:51 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2010-01-10 15:19 ` Daniel Walker
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Walker @ 2010-01-10 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 09:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is great to have all changes merged, but I ran into some trouble:
>
> 1) mmc.h was missing.
>
> 2) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c: In function 'msm_chg_rpc_connect':
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7201a_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7x27_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:157: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_qsd8x50_surf'
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o] Error 1
>
> (I provided missing inlines)
>
> 3) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:31:35: error: linux/remote_spinlock.h:
> No such file or directory
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:106: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
> 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'pll_lock'
>
It's still really really un-cooked .. There's tons of compile failures
that still need to be cleanup .. Most of the targets aren't going to
compile without tuning the config some..
What config are you using? I can try to correct some of the compile
failure ..
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree
@ 2010-01-10 15:19 ` Daniel Walker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Walker @ 2010-01-10 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Arve Hj?nnev?g, kernel list, linux-arm-kernel, Brian Swetland,
Iliyan Malchev
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 09:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is great to have all changes merged, but I ran into some trouble:
>
> 1) mmc.h was missing.
>
> 2) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c: In function 'msm_chg_rpc_connect':
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7201a_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7x27_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:157: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_qsd8x50_surf'
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o] Error 1
>
> (I provided missing inlines)
>
> 3) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:31:35: error: linux/remote_spinlock.h:
> No such file or directory
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:106: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
> 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'pll_lock'
>
It's still really really un-cooked .. There's tons of compile failures
that still need to be cleanup .. Most of the targets aren't going to
compile without tuning the config some..
What config are you using? I can try to correct some of the compile
failure ..
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-10 15:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-09 8:51 trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree Pavel Machek
2010-01-09 8:51 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-10 15:19 ` Daniel Walker
2010-01-10 15:19 ` Daniel Walker
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.