All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	peterz@infradead.org, awalls@radix.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, avi@redhat.com,
	johannes@sipsolutions.net, andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 23/40] workqueue: implement worker states
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:57:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263776272-382-24-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263776272-382-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Implement worker states.  After created, a worker is STARTED.  While a
worker isn't processing a work, it's IDLE and chained on
gcwq->idle_list.  While processing a work, a worker is BUSY and
chained on gcwq->busy_hash.  Also, gcwq now counts the number of all
workers and idle ones.

worker_thread() is restructured to reflect state transitions.
cwq->more_work is removed and waking up a worker makes it check for
events.  A worker is killed by setting DIE flag while it's IDLE and
waking it up.

This gives gcwq better visibility of what's going on and allows it to
find out whether a work is executing quickly which is necessary to
have multiple workers processing the same cwq.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |  207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 91c924c..104f72f 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -35,6 +35,17 @@
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/idr.h>
 
+enum {
+	/* worker flags */
+	WORKER_STARTED		= 1 << 0,	/* started */
+	WORKER_DIE		= 1 << 1,	/* die die die */
+	WORKER_IDLE		= 1 << 2,	/* is idle */
+
+	BUSY_WORKER_HASH_ORDER	= 5,		/* 32 pointers */
+	BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE	= 1 << BUSY_WORKER_HASH_ORDER,
+	BUSY_WORKER_HASH_MASK	= BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE - 1,
+};
+
 /*
  * Structure fields follow one of the following exclusion rules.
  *
@@ -51,11 +62,18 @@ struct global_cwq;
 struct cpu_workqueue_struct;
 
 struct worker {
+	/* on idle list while idle, on busy hash table while busy */
+	union {
+		struct list_head	entry;	/* L: while idle */
+		struct hlist_node	hentry;	/* L: while busy */
+	};
+
 	struct work_struct	*current_work;	/* L: work being processed */
 	struct list_head	scheduled;	/* L: scheduled works */
 	struct task_struct	*task;		/* I: worker task */
 	struct global_cwq	*gcwq;		/* I: the associated gcwq */
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;	/* I: the associated cwq */
+	unsigned int		flags;		/* L: flags */
 	int			id;		/* I: worker id */
 };
 
@@ -65,6 +83,15 @@ struct worker {
 struct global_cwq {
 	spinlock_t		lock;		/* the gcwq lock */
 	unsigned int		cpu;		/* I: the associated cpu */
+
+	int			nr_workers;	/* L: total number of workers */
+	int			nr_idle;	/* L: currently idle ones */
+
+	/* workers are chained either in the idle_list or busy_hash */
+	struct list_head	idle_list;	/* L: list of idle workers */
+	struct hlist_head	busy_hash[BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE];
+						/* L: hash of busy workers */
+
 	struct ida		worker_ida;	/* L: for worker IDs */
 } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
@@ -77,7 +104,6 @@ struct global_cwq {
 struct cpu_workqueue_struct {
 	struct global_cwq	*gcwq;		/* I: the associated gcwq */
 	struct list_head worklist;
-	wait_queue_head_t more_work;
 	struct worker		*worker;
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;		/* I: the owning workqueue */
 	int			work_color;	/* L: current color */
@@ -300,6 +326,33 @@ static inline struct cpu_workqueue_struct *get_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
 }
 
 /**
+ * busy_worker_head - return the busy hash head for a work
+ * @gcwq: gcwq of interest
+ * @work: work to be hashed
+ *
+ * Return hash head of @gcwq for @work.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * Pointer to the hash head.
+ */
+static struct hlist_head *busy_worker_head(struct global_cwq *gcwq,
+					   struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	const int base_shift = ilog2(sizeof(struct work_struct));
+	unsigned long v = (unsigned long)work;
+
+	/* simple shift and fold hash, do we need something better? */
+	v >>= base_shift;
+	v += v >> BUSY_WORKER_HASH_ORDER;
+	v &= BUSY_WORKER_HASH_MASK;
+
+	return &gcwq->busy_hash[v];
+}
+
+/**
  * insert_work - insert a work into cwq
  * @cwq: cwq @work belongs to
  * @work: work to insert
@@ -325,7 +378,7 @@ static void insert_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 	smp_wmb();
 
 	list_add_tail(&work->entry, head);
-	wake_up(&cwq->more_work);
+	wake_up_process(cwq->worker->task);
 }
 
 static void __queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
@@ -463,13 +516,59 @@ int queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(queue_delayed_work_on);
 
+/**
+ * worker_enter_idle - enter idle state
+ * @worker: worker which is entering idle state
+ *
+ * @worker is entering idle state.  Update stats and idle timer if
+ * necessary.
+ *
+ * LOCKING:
+ * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
+ */
+static void worker_enter_idle(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
+
+	BUG_ON(worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE);
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->entry) &&
+	       (worker->hentry.next || worker->hentry.pprev));
+
+	worker->flags |= WORKER_IDLE;
+	gcwq->nr_idle++;
+
+	/* idle_list is LIFO */
+	list_add(&worker->entry, &gcwq->idle_list);
+}
+
+/**
+ * worker_leave_idle - leave idle state
+ * @worker: worker which is leaving idle state
+ *
+ * @worker is leaving idle state.  Update stats.
+ *
+ * LOCKING:
+ * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
+ */
+static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
+
+	BUG_ON(!(worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE));
+	worker->flags &= ~WORKER_IDLE;
+	gcwq->nr_idle--;
+	list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+}
+
 static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
 {
 	struct worker *worker;
 
 	worker = kzalloc(sizeof(*worker), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (worker)
+	if (worker) {
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->entry);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worker->scheduled);
+	}
 	return worker;
 }
 
@@ -534,13 +633,16 @@ fail:
  * start_worker - start a newly created worker
  * @worker: worker to start
  *
- * Start @worker.
+ * Make the gcwq aware of @worker and start it.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
  */
 static void start_worker(struct worker *worker)
 {
+	worker->flags |= WORKER_STARTED;
+	worker->gcwq->nr_workers++;
+	worker_enter_idle(worker);
 	wake_up_process(worker->task);
 }
 
@@ -548,7 +650,10 @@ static void start_worker(struct worker *worker)
  * destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker
  * @worker: worker to be destroyed
  *
- * Destroy @worker.
+ * Destroy @worker and adjust @gcwq stats accordingly.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock) which is released and regrabbed.
  */
 static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
 {
@@ -559,12 +664,21 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
 	BUG_ON(worker->current_work);
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled));
 
+	if (worker->flags & WORKER_STARTED)
+		gcwq->nr_workers--;
+	if (worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE)
+		gcwq->nr_idle--;
+
+	list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+	worker->flags |= WORKER_DIE;
+
+	spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+
 	kthread_stop(worker->task);
 	kfree(worker);
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 	ida_remove(&gcwq->worker_ida, id);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -680,6 +794,7 @@ static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = worker->cwq;
 	struct global_cwq *gcwq = cwq->gcwq;
+	struct hlist_head *bwh = busy_worker_head(gcwq, work);
 	work_func_t f = work->func;
 	int work_color;
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
@@ -694,6 +809,7 @@ static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 #endif
 	/* claim and process */
 	debug_work_deactivate(work);
+	hlist_add_head(&worker->hentry, bwh);
 	worker->current_work = work;
 	work_color = work_flags_to_color(*work_data_bits(work));
 	list_del_init(&work->entry);
@@ -721,6 +837,7 @@ static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 	spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
 	/* we're done with it, release */
+	hlist_del_init(&worker->hentry);
 	worker->current_work = NULL;
 	cwq_dec_nr_in_flight(cwq, work_color);
 }
@@ -757,42 +874,52 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
 	struct worker *worker = __worker;
 	struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = worker->cwq;
-	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 
-	for (;;) {
-		prepare_to_wait(&cwq->more_work, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-		if (!kthread_should_stop() &&
-		    list_empty(&cwq->worklist))
-			schedule();
-		finish_wait(&cwq->more_work, &wait);
+woke_up:
+	spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
-		if (kthread_should_stop())
-			break;
+	/* DIE can be set only while we're idle, checking here is enough */
+	if (worker->flags & WORKER_DIE) {
+		spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
 
-		spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+	worker_leave_idle(worker);
 
-		while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
-			struct work_struct *work =
-				list_first_entry(&cwq->worklist,
-						 struct work_struct, entry);
-
-			if (likely(!(*work_data_bits(work) &
-				     WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))) {
-				/* optimization path, not strictly necessary */
-				process_one_work(worker, work);
-				if (unlikely(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled)))
-					process_scheduled_works(worker);
-			} else {
-				move_linked_works(work, &worker->scheduled,
-						  NULL);
+	/*
+	 * ->scheduled list can only be filled while a worker is
+	 * preparing to process a work or actually processing it.
+	 * Make sure nobody diddled with it while I was sleeping.
+	 */
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled));
+
+	while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
+		struct work_struct *work =
+			list_first_entry(&cwq->worklist,
+					 struct work_struct, entry);
+
+		if (likely(!(*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))) {
+			/* optimization path, not strictly necessary */
+			process_one_work(worker, work);
+			if (unlikely(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled)))
 				process_scheduled_works(worker);
-			}
+		} else {
+			move_linked_works(work, &worker->scheduled, NULL);
+			process_scheduled_works(worker);
 		}
-
-		spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	/*
+	 * gcwq->lock is held and there's no work to process, sleep.
+	 * Workers are woken up only while holding gcwq->lock, so
+	 * setting the current state before releasing gcwq->lock is
+	 * enough to prevent losing any event.
+	 */
+	worker_enter_idle(worker);
+	__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+	schedule();
+	goto woke_up;
 }
 
 struct wq_barrier {
@@ -1551,7 +1678,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__create_workqueue_key(const char *name,
 		cwq->max_active = max_active;
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cwq->worklist);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cwq->delayed_works);
-		init_waitqueue_head(&cwq->more_work);
 
 		if (failed)
 			continue;
@@ -1602,7 +1728,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__create_workqueue_key);
  */
 void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 {
-	int cpu;
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
 	flush_workqueue(wq);
 
@@ -1619,8 +1745,10 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 		int i;
 
 		if (cwq->worker) {
+			spin_lock_irq(&cwq->gcwq->lock);
 			destroy_worker(cwq->worker);
 			cwq->worker = NULL;
+			spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->gcwq->lock);
 		}
 
 		for (i = 0; i < WORK_NR_COLORS; i++)
@@ -1835,7 +1963,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
 			       cwq->nr_active < cwq->max_active)
 				cwq_activate_first_delayed(cwq);
 
-			wake_up(&cwq->more_work);
+			wake_up_process(cwq->worker->task);
 		}
 
 		spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
@@ -1850,6 +1978,7 @@ out_unlock:
 void __init init_workqueues(void)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
+	int i;
 
 	/*
 	 * cwqs are forced aligned according to WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_BITS.
@@ -1869,6 +1998,10 @@ void __init init_workqueues(void)
 		spin_lock_init(&gcwq->lock);
 		gcwq->cpu = cpu;
 
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->idle_list);
+		for (i = 0; i < BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE; i++)
+			INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&gcwq->busy_hash[i]);
+
 		ida_init(&gcwq->worker_ida);
 	}
 
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-18  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-18  0:57 [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 01/40] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 10:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:26     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 02/40] sched: rename preempt_notifiers to sched_notifiers and refactor implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 03/40] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 04/40] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:22     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 11:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:07         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:37           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:35             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:50               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  9:00                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-24  8:18               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 05/40] sched: make sched_notifiers unconditional Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 06/40] sched: add wakeup/sleep sched_notifiers and allow NULL notifier ops Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:31     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:04         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:28           ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:55             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:47               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 07/40] sched: implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 08/40] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 09/40] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 10/40] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 11/40] workqueue: merge feature parameters into flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 12/40] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 13/40] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 14/40] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 15/40] workqueue: kill cpu_populated_map Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 16/40] workqueue: update cwq alignement Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 17/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 18/40] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 19/40] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 20/40] workqueue: implement per-cwq active work limit Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 21/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using max_active Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 22/40] workqueue: introduce global cwq and unify cwq locks Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 24/40] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplugging support using trustee Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 25/40] workqueue: make single thread workqueue shared worker pool friendly Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 26/40] workqueue: use shared worklist and pool all workers per cpu Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 27/40] workqueue: implement concurrency managed dynamic worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 28/40] workqueue: increase max_active of keventd and kill current_is_keventd() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 29/40] workqueue: add system_wq and system_single_wq Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 30/40] workqueue: implement work_busy() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  2:52   ` Andy Walls
2010-01-18  5:41     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 31/40] libata: take advantage of cmwq and remove concurrency limitations Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:48   ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-19  0:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 32/40] async: introduce workqueue based alternative implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  6:01   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-18  8:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:25       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  0:57         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  0:57           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  7:56             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 14:37               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  0:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:31                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  2:08                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  6:03                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  8:24                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 10:59                           ` [PATCH] async: use workqueue for worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 33/40] async: convert async users to use the new implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 34/40] async: kill original implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 35/40] fscache: convert object to use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 18:03   ` David Howells
2010-02-13  5:43     ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-15 15:04       ` David Howells
2010-02-16  3:40         ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16  3:59           ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16 18:05           ` David Howells
2010-02-16 23:50             ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-18 11:50               ` David Howells
2010-02-18 12:33                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 36/40] fscache: convert operation " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 37/40] fscache: drop references to slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 38/40] cifs: use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 12:20   ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  0:15     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:56       ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  1:23         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:14           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:45             ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-24 12:13                 ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-25 15:25                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 39/40] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:45   ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-18 11:24     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:07       ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-19  1:00         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:46           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 40/40] slow-work: kill it Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  1:03 ` perf-wq.c used to generate synthetic workload Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 16:13 ` [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1263776272-382-24-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=awalls@radix.net \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.