All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	peterz@infradead.org, awalls@radix.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, avi@redhat.com,
	johannes@sipsolutions.net, andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 26/40] workqueue: use shared worklist and pool all workers per cpu
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:57:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263776272-382-27-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263776272-382-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Use gcwq->worklist instead of cwq->worklist and break the strict
association between a cwq and its worker.  All works queued on a cpu
are queued on gcwq->worklist and processed by any available worker on
the gcwq.

As there no longer is strict association between a cwq and its worker,
whether a work is executing can now only be determined using
gcwq->busy_hash[].  [__]find_worker_executing_work() are implemented
for this and used where it's necessary to find whether a work is being
executed and if so which worker is executing it.

After this change, the only association between a cwq and its worker
is that a cwq puts a worker into shared worker pool on creation and
kills it on destruction.  As all workqueues are still limited to
max_active of one, this means that there are always at least as many
workers as active works and thus there's no danger for deadlock.

The break of strong association between cwqs and workers requires
somewhat clumsy changes to current_is_keventd() and
destroy_workqueue().  Dynamic worker pool management will remove both
clumsy changes.  current_is_keventd() won't be necessary at all as the
only reason it exists is to avoid queueing a work from a work which
will be allowed just fine.  The clumsy part of destroy_workqueue() is
added because a worker can only be destroyed while idle and there's no
guarantee a worker is idle when its wq is going down.  With dynamic
pool management, workers are not associated with workqueues at all and
only idle ones will be submitted to destroy_workqueue() so the code
won't be necessary anymore.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |  192 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 19cfa12..f38d263 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ enum {
  */
 
 struct global_cwq;
-struct cpu_workqueue_struct;
 
 struct worker {
 	/* on idle list while idle, on busy hash table while busy */
@@ -85,7 +84,6 @@ struct worker {
 	struct list_head	scheduled;	/* L: scheduled works */
 	struct task_struct	*task;		/* I: worker task */
 	struct global_cwq	*gcwq;		/* I: the associated gcwq */
-	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;	/* I: the associated cwq */
 	unsigned int		flags;		/* L: flags */
 	int			id;		/* I: worker id */
 };
@@ -95,6 +93,7 @@ struct worker {
  */
 struct global_cwq {
 	spinlock_t		lock;		/* the gcwq lock */
+	struct list_head	worklist;	/* L: list of pending works */
 	unsigned int		cpu;		/* I: the associated cpu */
 	unsigned int		flags;		/* L: GCWQ_* flags */
 
@@ -120,7 +119,6 @@ struct global_cwq {
  */
 struct cpu_workqueue_struct {
 	struct global_cwq	*gcwq;		/* I: the associated gcwq */
-	struct list_head worklist;
 	struct worker		*worker;
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;		/* I: the owning workqueue */
 	int			work_color;	/* L: current color */
@@ -338,6 +336,32 @@ static inline struct cpu_workqueue_struct *get_wq_data(struct work_struct *work)
 			WORK_STRUCT_WQ_DATA_MASK);
 }
 
+/* Return the first worker.  Safe with preemption disabled */
+static struct worker *first_worker(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
+{
+	if (unlikely(list_empty(&gcwq->idle_list)))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return list_first_entry(&gcwq->idle_list, struct worker, entry);
+}
+
+/**
+ * wake_up_worker - wake up an idle worker
+ * @gcwq: gcwq to wake worker for
+ *
+ * Wake up the first idle worker of @gcwq.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
+ */
+static void wake_up_worker(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
+{
+	struct worker *worker = first_worker(gcwq);
+
+	if (likely(worker))
+		wake_up_process(worker->task);
+}
+
 /**
  * busy_worker_head - return the busy hash head for a work
  * @gcwq: gcwq of interest
@@ -366,13 +390,67 @@ static struct hlist_head *busy_worker_head(struct global_cwq *gcwq,
 }
 
 /**
- * insert_work - insert a work into cwq
+ * __find_worker_executing_work - find worker which is executing a work
+ * @gcwq: gcwq of interest
+ * @bwh: hash head as returned by busy_worker_head()
+ * @work: work to find worker for
+ *
+ * Find a worker which is executing @work on @gcwq.  @bwh should be
+ * the hash head obtained by calling busy_worker_head() with the same
+ * work.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * Pointer to worker which is executing @work if found, NULL
+ * otherwise.
+ */
+static struct worker *__find_worker_executing_work(struct global_cwq *gcwq,
+						   struct hlist_head *bwh,
+						   struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct worker *worker;
+	struct hlist_node *tmp;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(worker, tmp, bwh, hentry)
+		if (worker->current_work == work)
+			return worker;
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * find_worker_executing_work - find worker which is executing a work
+ * @gcwq: gcwq of interest
+ * @work: work to find worker for
+ *
+ * Find a worker which is executing @work on @gcwq.  This function is
+ * identical to __find_worker_executing_work() except that this
+ * function calculates @bwh itself.
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * Pointer to worker which is executing @work if found, NULL
+ * otherwise.
+ */
+static struct worker *find_worker_executing_work(struct global_cwq *gcwq,
+						 struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	return __find_worker_executing_work(gcwq, busy_worker_head(gcwq, work),
+					    work);
+}
+
+/**
+ * insert_work - insert a work into gcwq
  * @cwq: cwq @work belongs to
  * @work: work to insert
  * @head: insertion point
  * @extra_flags: extra WORK_STRUCT_* flags to set
  *
- * Insert @work into @cwq after @head.
+ * Insert @work which belongs to @cwq into @gcwq after @head.
+ * @extra_flags is or'd to work_struct flags.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * spin_lock_irq(gcwq->lock).
@@ -391,7 +469,7 @@ static void insert_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 	smp_wmb();
 
 	list_add_tail(&work->entry, head);
-	wake_up_process(cwq->worker->task);
+	wake_up_worker(cwq->gcwq);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -478,7 +556,7 @@ static void __queue_work(unsigned int req_cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 
 	if (likely(cwq->nr_active < cwq->max_active)) {
 		cwq->nr_active++;
-		worklist = &cwq->worklist;
+		worklist = &gcwq->worklist;
 	} else
 		worklist = &cwq->delayed_works;
 
@@ -657,10 +735,10 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
 
 /**
  * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker
- * @cwq: cwq the new worker will belong to
+ * @gcwq: gcwq the new worker will belong to
  * @bind: whether to set affinity to @cpu or not
  *
- * Create a new worker which is bound to @cwq.  The returned worker
+ * Create a new worker which is bound to @gcwq.  The returned worker
  * can be started by calling start_worker() or destroyed using
  * destroy_worker().
  *
@@ -670,9 +748,8 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
  * RETURNS:
  * Pointer to the newly created worker.
  */
-static struct worker *create_worker(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq, bool bind)
+static struct worker *create_worker(struct global_cwq *gcwq, bool bind)
 {
-	struct global_cwq *gcwq = cwq->gcwq;
 	int id = -1;
 	struct worker *worker = NULL;
 
@@ -690,7 +767,6 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq, bool bind)
 		goto fail;
 
 	worker->gcwq = gcwq;
-	worker->cwq = cwq;
 	worker->id = id;
 
 	worker->task = kthread_create(worker_thread, worker, "kworker/%u:%d",
@@ -818,7 +894,7 @@ static void cwq_activate_first_delayed(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
 	struct work_struct *work = list_first_entry(&cwq->delayed_works,
 						    struct work_struct, entry);
 
-	move_linked_works(work, &cwq->worklist, NULL);
+	move_linked_works(work, &cwq->gcwq->worklist, NULL);
 	cwq->nr_active++;
 }
 
@@ -886,11 +962,12 @@ static void cwq_dec_nr_in_flight(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq, int color)
  */
 static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = worker->cwq;
+	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_wq_data(work);
 	struct global_cwq *gcwq = cwq->gcwq;
 	struct hlist_head *bwh = busy_worker_head(gcwq, work);
 	work_func_t f = work->func;
 	int work_color;
+	struct worker *collision;
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	/*
 	 * It is permissible to free the struct work_struct from
@@ -901,6 +978,18 @@ static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 	 */
 	struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = work->lockdep_map;
 #endif
+	/*
+	 * A single work shouldn't be executed concurrently by
+	 * multiple workers on a single cpu.  Check whether anyone is
+	 * already processing the work.  If so, defer the work to the
+	 * currently executing one.
+	 */
+	collision = __find_worker_executing_work(gcwq, bwh, work);
+	if (unlikely(collision)) {
+		move_linked_works(work, &collision->scheduled, NULL);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/* claim and process */
 	debug_work_deactivate(work);
 	hlist_add_head(&worker->hentry, bwh);
@@ -910,7 +999,6 @@ static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
-	BUG_ON(get_wq_data(work) != cwq);
 	work_clear_pending(work);
 	lock_map_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
 	lock_map_acquire(&lockdep_map);
@@ -967,7 +1055,6 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
 {
 	struct worker *worker = __worker;
 	struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
-	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = worker->cwq;
 
 woke_up:
 	spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
@@ -987,9 +1074,9 @@ woke_up:
 	 */
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled));
 
-	while (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist)) {
+	while (!list_empty(&gcwq->worklist)) {
 		struct work_struct *work =
-			list_first_entry(&cwq->worklist,
+			list_first_entry(&gcwq->worklist,
 					 struct work_struct, entry);
 
 		if (likely(!(*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))) {
@@ -1343,8 +1430,7 @@ int flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		if (unlikely(cwq != get_wq_data(work)))
 			goto already_gone;
 	} else {
-		if (cwq->worker && cwq->worker->current_work == work)
-			worker = cwq->worker;
+		worker = find_worker_executing_work(gcwq, work);
 		if (!worker)
 			goto already_gone;
 	}
@@ -1413,11 +1499,9 @@ static void wait_on_cpu_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
-	worker = NULL;
-	if (unlikely(cwq->worker && cwq->worker->current_work == work)) {
-		worker = cwq->worker;
+	worker = find_worker_executing_work(gcwq, work);
+	if (unlikely(worker))
 		insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, work, worker);
-	}
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
@@ -1671,18 +1755,37 @@ int keventd_up(void)
 
 int current_is_keventd(void)
 {
-	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
-	int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); /* preempt-safe: keventd is per-cpu */
-	int ret = 0;
+	bool found = false;
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	BUG_ON(!keventd_wq);
+	/*
+	 * There no longer is one-to-one relation between worker and
+	 * work queue and a worker task might be unbound from its cpu
+	 * if the cpu was offlined.  Match all busy workers.  This
+	 * function will go away once dynamic pool is implemented.
+	 */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
+		struct worker *worker;
+		struct hlist_node *pos;
+		unsigned long flags;
+		int i;
 
-	cwq = get_cwq(cpu, keventd_wq);
-	if (current == cwq->worker->task)
-		ret = 1;
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&gcwq->lock, flags);
 
-	return ret;
+		for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, gcwq) {
+			if (worker->task == current) {
+				found = true;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gcwq->lock, flags);
+		if (found)
+			break;
+	}
 
+	return found;
 }
 
 static struct cpu_workqueue_struct *alloc_cwqs(void)
@@ -1771,12 +1874,11 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__create_workqueue_key(const char *name,
 		cwq->wq = wq;
 		cwq->flush_color = -1;
 		cwq->max_active = max_active;
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cwq->worklist);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cwq->delayed_works);
 
 		if (failed)
 			continue;
-		cwq->worker = create_worker(cwq, cpu_online(cpu));
+		cwq->worker = create_worker(gcwq, cpu_online(cpu));
 		if (cwq->worker)
 			start_worker(cwq->worker);
 		else
@@ -1836,13 +1938,26 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
+		struct global_cwq *gcwq = cwq->gcwq;
 		int i;
 
 		if (cwq->worker) {
-			spin_lock_irq(&cwq->gcwq->lock);
+		retry:
+			spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+			/*
+			 * Worker can only be destroyed while idle.
+			 * Wait till it becomes idle.  This is ugly
+			 * and prone to starvation.  It will go away
+			 * once dynamic worker pool is implemented.
+			 */
+			if (!(cwq->worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE)) {
+				spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+				msleep(100);
+				goto retry;
+			}
 			destroy_worker(cwq->worker);
 			cwq->worker = NULL;
-			spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->gcwq->lock);
+			spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 		}
 
 		for (i = 0; i < WORK_NR_COLORS; i++)
@@ -2161,7 +2276,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);
  *
  * Start freezing workqueues.  After this function returns, all
  * freezeable workqueues will queue new works to their frozen_works
- * list instead of the cwq ones.
+ * list instead of gcwq->worklist.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and gcwq->lock's.
@@ -2247,7 +2362,7 @@ out_unlock:
  * thaw_workqueues - thaw workqueues
  *
  * Thaw workqueues.  Normal queueing is restored and all collected
- * frozen works are transferred to their respective cwq worklists.
+ * frozen works are transferred to their respective gcwq worklists.
  *
  * CONTEXT:
  * Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and gcwq->lock's.
@@ -2320,6 +2435,7 @@ void __init init_workqueues(void)
 		struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
 
 		spin_lock_init(&gcwq->lock);
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->worklist);
 		gcwq->cpu = cpu;
 
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gcwq->idle_list);
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-18  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-18  0:57 [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 01/40] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 10:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:26     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 02/40] sched: rename preempt_notifiers to sched_notifiers and refactor implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 03/40] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 04/40] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:22     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 11:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:07         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:37           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:35             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:50               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  9:00                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  8:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-24  8:18               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 05/40] sched: make sched_notifiers unconditional Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 06/40] sched: add wakeup/sleep sched_notifiers and allow NULL notifier ops Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:31     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-19  1:04         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:28           ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:55             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20  8:47               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 07/40] sched: implement try_to_wake_up_local() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 08/40] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 09/40] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 10/40] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 11/40] workqueue: merge feature parameters into flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 12/40] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 13/40] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 14/40] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 15/40] workqueue: kill cpu_populated_map Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 16/40] workqueue: update cwq alignement Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 17/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 18/40] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 19/40] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 20/40] workqueue: implement per-cwq active work limit Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 21/40] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using max_active Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 22/40] workqueue: introduce global cwq and unify cwq locks Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 23/40] workqueue: implement worker states Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 24/40] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplugging support using trustee Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 25/40] workqueue: make single thread workqueue shared worker pool friendly Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 27/40] workqueue: implement concurrency managed dynamic worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 28/40] workqueue: increase max_active of keventd and kill current_is_keventd() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 29/40] workqueue: add system_wq and system_single_wq Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 30/40] workqueue: implement work_busy() Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  2:52   ` Andy Walls
2010-01-18  5:41     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 31/40] libata: take advantage of cmwq and remove concurrency limitations Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:48   ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-19  0:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 32/40] async: introduce workqueue based alternative implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  6:01   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-18  8:49     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 15:25       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  0:57         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  0:57           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-19  7:56             ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 14:37               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  0:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:31                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  2:08                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  6:03                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20  8:24                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 10:59                           ` [PATCH] async: use workqueue for worker pool Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 33/40] async: convert async users to use the new implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 34/40] async: kill original implementation Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 35/40] fscache: convert object to use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 18:03   ` David Howells
2010-02-13  5:43     ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-15 15:04       ` David Howells
2010-02-16  3:40         ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16  3:59           ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-16 18:05           ` David Howells
2010-02-16 23:50             ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-18 11:50               ` David Howells
2010-02-18 12:33                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 36/40] fscache: convert operation " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 37/40] fscache: drop references to slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 38/40] cifs: use workqueue instead of slow-work Tejun Heo
2010-01-19 12:20   ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  0:15     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20  0:56       ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-20  1:23         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:14           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-22 11:45             ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-24 12:13                 ` Jeff Layton
2010-01-25 15:25                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 39/40] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  9:45   ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-18 11:24     ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 12:07       ` Steven Whitehouse
2010-01-19  1:00         ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-19  8:46           ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  0:57 ` [PATCH 40/40] slow-work: kill it Tejun Heo
2010-01-18  1:03 ` perf-wq.c used to generate synthetic workload Tejun Heo
2010-01-18 16:13 ` [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3 Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1263776272-382-27-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=awalls@radix.net \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.