From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: <mingo@elte.hu>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] x86, smp: Convert msr-smp.c to an smp library
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:41:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264092093-13739-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264092093-13739-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Put all smp-related helpers into lib/smp.c to use for the rest of the
kernel.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c | 204 ------------------------------------------------
arch/x86/lib/smp.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/smp.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
index cffd754..48a5ced 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ $(obj)/inat.o: $(obj)/inat-tables.c
clean-files := inat-tables.c
-obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += msr-smp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o
lib-y := delay.o
lib-y += thunk_$(BITS).o
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a6b1b86..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,204 +0,0 @@
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/preempt.h>
-#include <linux/smp.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
-
-static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
- struct msr *reg;
- int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-
- if (rv->msrs)
- reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
- else
- reg = &rv->reg;
-
- rdmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
- struct msr *reg;
- int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-
- if (rv->msrs)
- reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
- else
- reg = &rv->reg;
-
- wrmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.reg.l;
- *h = rv.reg.h;
-
- return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.reg.l = l;
- rv.reg.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
-
-static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
- struct msr *msrs,
- void (*msr_func) (void *info))
-{
- struct msr_info rv;
- int this_cpu;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msrs = msrs;
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
-
- this_cpu = get_cpu();
-
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
- msr_func(&rv);
-
- smp_call_function_many(mask, msr_func, &rv, 1);
- put_cpu();
-}
-
-/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
- *
- * @mask: which CPUs
- * @msr_no: which MSR
- * @msrs: array of MSR values
- *
- */
-void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
-{
- __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __rdmsr_on_cpu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
-
-/*
- * wrmsr on a bunch of CPUs
- *
- * @mask: which CPUs
- * @msr_no: which MSR
- * @msrs: array of MSR values
- *
- */
-void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
-{
- __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __wrmsr_on_cpu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
-
-/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
- may not actually exist. */
-static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->reg.l, &rv->reg.h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->reg.l, rv->reg.h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.reg.l;
- *h = rv.reg.h;
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.reg.l = l;
- rv.reg.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
-
-/*
- * These variants are significantly slower, but allows control over
- * the entire 32-bit GPR set.
- */
-static void __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = rdmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = wrmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_regs_info rv;
-
- rv.regs = regs;
- rv.err = -EIO;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_regs_info rv;
-
- rv.regs = regs;
- rv.err = -EIO;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/smp.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6b1b86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/smp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <asm/msr.h>
+
+static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+ struct msr *reg;
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (rv->msrs)
+ reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
+ else
+ reg = &rv->reg;
+
+ rdmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+ struct msr *reg;
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (rv->msrs)
+ reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
+ else
+ reg = &rv->reg;
+
+ wrmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.reg.l;
+ *h = rv.reg.h;
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.l = l;
+ rv.reg.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
+
+static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
+ struct msr *msrs,
+ void (*msr_func) (void *info))
+{
+ struct msr_info rv;
+ int this_cpu;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msrs = msrs;
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+
+ this_cpu = get_cpu();
+
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
+ msr_func(&rv);
+
+ smp_call_function_many(mask, msr_func, &rv, 1);
+ put_cpu();
+}
+
+/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ */
+void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __rdmsr_on_cpu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/*
+ * wrmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ */
+void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __wrmsr_on_cpu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
+ may not actually exist. */
+static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->reg.l, &rv->reg.h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->reg.l, rv->reg.h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.reg.l;
+ *h = rv.reg.h;
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.l = l;
+ rv.reg.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+
+/*
+ * These variants are significantly slower, but allows control over
+ * the entire 32-bit GPR set.
+ */
+static void __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = rdmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = wrmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_regs_info rv;
+
+ rv.regs = regs;
+ rv.err = -EIO;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_regs_info rv;
+
+ rv.regs = regs;
+ rv.err = -EIO;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
--
1.6.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 16:41 [PATCH -v2 0/7] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2010-01-21 18:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86, smp: Convert msr-smp.c to an smp library H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86, smp: Adjust native_wbinvd for smp_call_function-helpers Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 18:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86, smp: Add wbinvd_on_all_cpus helper Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] intel-agp: Switch to wbinvd_on_all_cpus Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86, cacheinfo: Fix disabling of L3 cache indices Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86, cacheinfo: Add cache index disable sysfs attrs only to L3 caches Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indexes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 17:57 ` [PATCH] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indices Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264092093-13739-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.