Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "recipes/images/console-base-image.bb: factor out Angstrom-specific bits"

Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "recipes/images/console-base-image.bb: factor out Angstrom-specific bits"

[Michael 'Mickey' Lauer]

What has become of our revertion policy?

If I recall correctly, reverting foreign commits need ACK from two
members.

On the actual subject of recipes; Rolf, let me encourage you to create
another set of console-image[-base], i.e. agnostic-console-image or so.
If we can no longer refactor in OE, then we have to resort to creating a
parallel world.

Cheers,

:M:

Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "recipes/images/console-base-image.bb: factor out Angstrom-specific bits"

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/2/17 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mickey@vanille-media.de>:
> What has become of our revertion policy?
>
> If I recall correctly, reverting foreign commits need ACK from two
> members.
>
> On the actual subject of recipes; Rolf, let me encourage you to create
> another set of console-image[-base], i.e. agnostic-console-image or so.
> If we can no longer refactor in OE, then we have to resort to creating a
> parallel world.
>
> Cheers,
>
> :M:

+1 for this proposal

Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "recipes/images/console-base-image.bb: factor out Angstrom-specific bits"

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/2/17 Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com>:
> 2010/2/17 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mickey@vanille-media.de>:
>> What has become of our revertion policy?
>>
>> If I recall correctly, reverting foreign commits need ACK from two
>> members.
>>
>> On the actual subject of recipes; Rolf, let me encourage you to create
>> another set of console-image[-base], i.e. agnostic-console-image or so.
>> If we can no longer refactor in OE, then we have to resort to creating a
>> parallel world.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> :M:
>
> +1 for this proposal
>

Can we have a TSC decision on what to do with console-image?

Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "recipes/images/console-base-image.bb: factor out Angstrom-specific bits"

[Graeme Gregory]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:09:35AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> Can we have a TSC decision on what to do with console-image?
> 
Please be aware that the TSC has members for different timezones and that
we all have daytime jobs so a decision will not come until appropriate
discussion has finished.

Graeme

Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "recipes/images/console-base-image.bb: factor out Angstrom-specific bits"

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/2/18 Graeme Gregory <dp@xora.org.uk>:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:09:35AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> Can we have a TSC decision on what to do with console-image?
>>
> Please be aware that the TSC has members for different timezones and that
> we all have daytime jobs so a decision will not come until appropriate
> discussion has finished.
>
> Graeme

I know (and I fully agree with it).
It would be nice if the community would be kept informed on the
process (e.g. when the TSC does meet).

Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : Revert "recipes/images/console-base-image.bb: factor out Angstrom-specific bits"

[Rolf Leggewie]

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> What has become of our revertion policy?

Policy does not apply to our dictator.  To him, it's only a method to
impose his will on others when it suits him.

And no, I don't feel like trying to navigate around the issues he has.
My only option is to try and ignore parcels in OE where he has claimed a
stake for his fiefdom.  Until, of course, it again becomes unbearable to
ignore...

Regards

La - atively looking for OE replacement - ibsch