From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Be
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/33] x86: Make e820_remove_range() to handle all covered case
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:16:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270001838-15857-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270001838-15857-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Rusty found on lguest with trim_bios_range, max_pfn is not right anymore, and
looks e820_remove_range does not work right.
[ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[ 0.000000] LGUEST: 0000000000000000 - 0000000004000000 (usable)
[ 0.000000] Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection missing in CPU or disabled in BIOS!
[ 0.000000] DMI not present or invalid.
[ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0x3fa0 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000
[ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-0000000003fa0000
root cause is: the e820_remove_range doesn't handle that all cover case.
e820_remove_range(BIOS_START, BIOS_END - BIOS_start, ,,)
get miss one left range.
Make that is corresponding to e820_update_range() to handle that case too.
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 740b440..7bca3c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -519,29 +519,45 @@ u64 __init e820_remove_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
printk(KERN_DEBUG "e820 remove range: %016Lx - %016Lx ",
(unsigned long long) start,
(unsigned long long) end);
- e820_print_type(old_type);
+ if (checktype)
+ e820_print_type(old_type);
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) {
struct e820entry *ei = &e820.map[i];
u64 final_start, final_end;
+ u64 ei_end;
if (checktype && ei->type != old_type)
continue;
+
+ ei_end = ei->addr + ei->size;
/* totally covered? */
- if (ei->addr >= start &&
- (ei->addr + ei->size) <= (start + size)) {
+ if (ei->addr >= start && ei_end <= end) {
real_removed_size += ei->size;
memset(ei, 0, sizeof(struct e820entry));
continue;
}
+
+ /* new range is totally covered? */
+ if (ei->addr < start && ei_end > end) {
+ e820_add_region(end, ei_end - end, ei->type);
+ ei->size = start - ei->addr;
+ real_removed_size += size;
+ continue;
+ }
+
/* partially covered */
final_start = max(start, ei->addr);
- final_end = min(start + size, ei->addr + ei->size);
+ final_end = min(end, ei_end);
if (final_start >= final_end)
continue;
real_removed_size += final_end - final_start;
+ /*
+ * left range could be head or tail, so need to update
+ * size at first.
+ */
ei->size -= final_end - final_start;
if (ei->addr < final_start)
continue;
--
1.6.4.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/33] x86: Make e820_remove_range() to handle all covered case
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:16:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270001838-15857-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20100331021646.tD7hzl8LLyqD-REyHps7sWg_8RQkrdw7GjDnoYiivko@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270001838-15857-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Rusty found on lguest with trim_bios_range, max_pfn is not right anymore, and
looks e820_remove_range does not work right.
[ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[ 0.000000] LGUEST: 0000000000000000 - 0000000004000000 (usable)
[ 0.000000] Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection missing in CPU or disabled in BIOS!
[ 0.000000] DMI not present or invalid.
[ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0x3fa0 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000
[ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-0000000003fa0000
root cause is: the e820_remove_range doesn't handle that all cover case.
e820_remove_range(BIOS_START, BIOS_END - BIOS_start, ,,)
get miss one left range.
Make that is corresponding to e820_update_range() to handle that case too.
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 740b440..7bca3c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -519,29 +519,45 @@ u64 __init e820_remove_range(u64 start, u64 size, unsigned old_type,
printk(KERN_DEBUG "e820 remove range: %016Lx - %016Lx ",
(unsigned long long) start,
(unsigned long long) end);
- e820_print_type(old_type);
+ if (checktype)
+ e820_print_type(old_type);
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) {
struct e820entry *ei = &e820.map[i];
u64 final_start, final_end;
+ u64 ei_end;
if (checktype && ei->type != old_type)
continue;
+
+ ei_end = ei->addr + ei->size;
/* totally covered? */
- if (ei->addr >= start &&
- (ei->addr + ei->size) <= (start + size)) {
+ if (ei->addr >= start && ei_end <= end) {
real_removed_size += ei->size;
memset(ei, 0, sizeof(struct e820entry));
continue;
}
+
+ /* new range is totally covered? */
+ if (ei->addr < start && ei_end > end) {
+ e820_add_region(end, ei_end - end, ei->type);
+ ei->size = start - ei->addr;
+ real_removed_size += size;
+ continue;
+ }
+
/* partially covered */
final_start = max(start, ei->addr);
- final_end = min(start + size, ei->addr + ei->size);
+ final_end = min(end, ei_end);
if (final_start >= final_end)
continue;
real_removed_size += final_end - final_start;
+ /*
+ * left range could be head or tail, so need to update
+ * size at first.
+ */
ei->size -= final_end - final_start;
if (ei->addr < final_start)
continue;
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 2:16 [PATCH -v11 00/33] use lmb with x86 Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 01/33] x86: Make e820_remove_range() to handle all covered case Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 02/33] lmb: Move lmb.c to mm/ Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 03/33] lmb: Seperate region array from lmb_region struct Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 04/33] lmb: Seperate __lmb_find_base() from __lmb_alloc_base() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 05/33] lmb: Add lmb_find_area() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 06/33] lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area/lmb_free_area Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-07 23:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-07 23:36 ` Yinghai
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 07/33] bootmem, x86: Add weak version of reserve_bootmem_generic Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 08/33] lmb: Add lmb_to_bootmem() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 09/33] lmb: Add get_free_all_memory_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 10/33] lmb: Add lmb_register_active_regions() and lmb_hole_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 11/33] lmb: Prepare to include linux/lmb.h in core file Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 12/33] lmb: Add find_memory_core_early() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 13/33] lmb: Add lmb_find_area_node() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` [PATCH 14/33] lmb: Add lmb_free_memory_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 15/33] lmb: Add lmb_memory_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 16/33] lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 17/33] lmb: Use lmb_debug to control debug message print out Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 18/33] lmb: Add ARCH_DISCARD_LMB to put lmb code to .init Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 19/33] x86: Add sanitize_e820_map() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 20/33] x86, lmb: Add lmb_find_area_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 21/33] x86, lmb: Add x86 version of __lmb_find_area() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 22/33] x86: Use lmb to replace early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 23/33] x86: Replace e820_/_early string with lmb_ Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 24/33] nobootmem: use lmb.default_alloc_limit in alloc_bootmem path Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 25/33] x86, lmb: turn off ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-07 23:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-07 23:40 ` Yinghai
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 26/33] x86: Remove not used early_res code Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 27/33] x86, lmb: Use lmb_memory_size()/lmb_free_memory_size() to get correct dma_reserve Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 28/33] x86: Align e820 ram range to page Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 29/33] x86: Use wake_system_ram_range instead of e820_any_mapped in agp path Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 30/33] x86: Add get_centaur_ram_top() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 31/33] x86: Change e820_any_mapped() to __init Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 32/33] x86: Use walk_system_ream_range() instead of referring e820.map directly for tboot Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` [PATCH 33/33] x86: make e820 to be __initdata Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 2:17 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270001838-15857-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.