All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:36:53 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270075013.7101.78.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003311640410.30456@router.home>

On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 16:42 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> Do not run the checks while we are in a single threaded context?
> 
> I thought we had some dynamic code patching thingamy that could change
> those when we go to smp mode? 

The problem isn't about checks. Those -will- enable IRQs before it's
safe to do so, the checks are perfectly right to point it out, it -is- a
bug waiting to happen on some random HW.

Cheers,
Ben.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-31 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-25 19:41 start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Rabin Vincent
2010-03-31 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 20:47   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 20:52     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 21:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:28         ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 22:35           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:13         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-01 14:27           ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01 20:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-02 14:46               ` David Howells
2010-04-02 14:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-07 19:09           ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-07 19:09             ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-08 15:55             ` Américo Wang
2010-04-08 15:55               ` Américo Wang
2010-03-31 21:01     ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:17         ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:42           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:54             ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:57               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:30                 ` Russell King
2010-03-31 22:37                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:49                   ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  1:17                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:26                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  6:26                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  3:33                           ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  6:48                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 11:06                               ` David Howells
2010-04-01 15:55                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-01 23:00                                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:15                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  6:50                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:36             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-04-01 15:57               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:05     ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:08         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:58       ` David Howells
2010-04-01  9:41         ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-01 10:50           ` David Howells
2010-04-01 11:23           ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 22:31     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:36       ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-18 15:50 Martin Michlmayr
2006-10-18 16:51 ` mlachwani
2006-10-18 18:14   ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1270075013.7101.78.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rabin@rab.in \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.