All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:49:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100331154955.54176e5e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270075071.7101.79.camel@pasglop>

On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:37:51 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 14:57 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > 
> > The question still remains what the incremental cost is of doing
> > irqsave/irqrestore. 
> 
> The only other option is to have local_irq_enable() check a global
> (system_state ?) before enabling. Almost as gross ...
> 

Add an irq-disable-depth counter to the task_struct, fix all the bugs
which that exposes..

But these things are all utterly gross.  The bottom line is that
radix_tree_init() is manifestly unsuited to being called with local
interrupts disabled.  773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 was just
a wrong patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-31 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-25 19:41 start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Rabin Vincent
2010-03-31 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 20:47   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 20:52     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 21:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:28         ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 22:35           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:13         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-01 14:27           ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01 20:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-02 14:46               ` David Howells
2010-04-02 14:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-07 19:09           ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-07 19:09             ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-08 15:55             ` Américo Wang
2010-04-08 15:55               ` Américo Wang
2010-03-31 21:01     ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:17         ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:42           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:54             ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:57               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:30                 ` Russell King
2010-03-31 22:37                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:49                   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-04-01  1:17                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:26                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  6:26                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  3:33                           ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01  6:48                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 11:06                               ` David Howells
2010-04-01 15:55                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-01 23:00                                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:15                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  6:50                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:36             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 15:57               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:05     ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:08         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:58       ` David Howells
2010-04-01  9:41         ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-01 10:50           ` David Howells
2010-04-01 11:23           ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 22:31     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:36       ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-18 15:50 Martin Michlmayr
2006-10-18 16:51 ` mlachwani
2006-10-18 18:14   ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100331154955.54176e5e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rabin@rab.in \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.