From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
To: Dima Zavin <dima@android.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, zpfeffer@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: msm: smd: fix SMD modem processor sync condition
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:42:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271706152.15004.26.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q2u404ea8001004191223rb8da1409pae25267a0667d20a@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 12:23 -0700, Dima Zavin wrote:
> But smd_core_init is already waiting for smd to be up. It waits for
> SMEM_SMSM_SHARED_STATE to be published. What does proc_comm have to do
> with it except for the fact that PCOM_READY gets set relatively late
> in the modem boot? If the shared state infrastructure is not yet
> initialized, it shouldn't be publishing it. Otherwise, you are just
> overloading PCOM_READY and again masking issues. Especially when we
> move to chips that don't need proc_comm for most things, and 7x30 is
> one of them where we get a lot of local clock control, it really seems
> wrong to wait for proc_comm to be up.
>
> You mentioned that this change will prevent some random crashes. Have
> you traced them down to what exactly is failing?
I traced the failures down to SMD failing to get initialized .. Be aware
that I'm using this version of SMD, but not a Google kernel. My kernel
has most of the drivers stripped away, with only SMD and MMC and a few
other things.
I've spoken with our SMD expert on this side, and waiting for PCOM_READY
appears to be the right thing to do here.. As for SMEM_SMSM_SHARED_STATE
I don't know, it's possible it's part of the modem simply not being
ready for input from SMD.. I can ask around on this side why that isn't
getting set or checked properly.
Even if this is a defect in the modem we still need to formalize this
check since this problem exists in released phones (like trout where I
found it).
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 18:03 [PATCH 5/5] arm: msm: smd: fix SMD modem processor sync condition Daniel Walker
2010-04-19 18:34 ` Dima Zavin
2010-04-19 19:01 ` Daniel Walker
2010-04-19 19:06 ` Dima Zavin
2010-04-19 19:11 ` Daniel Walker
2010-04-19 19:23 ` Dima Zavin
2010-04-19 19:42 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-04-20 13:37 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-20 15:44 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271706152.15004.26.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dima@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zpfeffer@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.