From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, therbert@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:11:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272316297.8918.49.camel@bigi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426.134051.232750473.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 13:40 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Why do you think Eric Dumazet gives a crap about UDP scalability and
> is constantly testing it? What about VOIP? H.323, RTP, etc.?
This is big of course. All the SIP/RTP stuff is largely UDP. Most P2P
control is via UDP. I think i did read somewhere on measurement taken
in backbones showing consistent rise of UDP:TCP ratio (need to search
my bookmarks).
It borders on lunacy to assume TCP only. Time to get an open source NIC
out there and ignore these big players? ;->
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 5:54 [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Tom Herbert
2010-04-23 7:11 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 17:38 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-26 17:47 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-04-26 17:56 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:04 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:19 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-26 18:22 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 20:19 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-26 20:40 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 20:48 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-26 20:53 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 21:12 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-27 18:31 ` Eilon Greenstein
2010-04-27 19:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 20:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-26 21:11 ` jamal [this message]
2010-04-26 21:14 ` jamal
2010-04-26 23:27 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 13:37 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 14:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 15:44 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 16:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:02 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 17:06 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:20 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: sk_add_backlog() take rmem_alloc into account Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 21:43 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:11 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-28 15:41 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-28 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Tom Herbert
2010-04-27 17:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-04 16:36 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-04 16:46 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-06 7:16 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-07 19:17 ` Tom Herbert
2010-07-08 8:40 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 2:12 ` David Miller
2010-07-11 10:02 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 13:16 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 17:22 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 18:18 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 22:34 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272316297.8918.49.camel@bigi \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.