All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@athenacr.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: therbert@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:02:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD71890.2050606@athenacr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100427.095108.68126984.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote:
> From: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@athenacr.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:37:11 -0400
> 
>> David Miller wrote:
>>> How damn hard is it to add two 16-bit ports to the hash regardless of
>>> protocol?
>>>   
>> Come to think of it, for UDP the hash must ignore
>> the srcport and srcaddr, because a single bound
>> socket is going to wildcard both those fields.
> 
> For load distribution we don't care if the local socket is wildcard
> bounded on source.
> 
> It's going to be fully specified in the packet, and that's enough.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding... won't it distribute the
packet handling load to multiple cores, but then all
those cores will contend trying to deliver those packets
to the single socket?

I was assuming that this'd be a net loss over just doing
all the protocol handling on a single core. I haven't
done any benchmarks yet.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-27 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-23  5:54 [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Tom Herbert
2010-04-23  7:11 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 17:38   ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-26 17:47     ` Ben Hutchings
2010-04-26 17:56       ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:04     ` David Miller
2010-04-26 18:19       ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-26 18:22         ` David Miller
2010-04-26 20:19           ` Rick Jones
2010-04-26 20:40             ` David Miller
2010-04-26 20:48               ` Rick Jones
2010-04-26 20:53                 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 21:12                   ` Rick Jones
2010-04-27 18:31                     ` Eilon Greenstein
2010-04-27 19:30                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 20:58               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-26 21:11               ` jamal
2010-04-26 21:14                 ` jamal
2010-04-26 23:27             ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 13:37       ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 14:30         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 15:44           ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-27 16:51         ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:02           ` Brian Bloniarz [this message]
2010-04-27 17:06             ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:20             ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:37               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 20:21                 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: sk_add_backlog() take rmem_alloc into account Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 21:43                   ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:11                     ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:19                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-28 15:41                   ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-04-28 15:52                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:31             ` [PATCH] bnx2x: add support for receive hashing Tom Herbert
2010-04-27 17:36               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-04 16:36 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-04 16:46   ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-06  7:16   ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-07 19:17     ` Tom Herbert
2010-07-08  8:40       ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11  2:12       ` David Miller
2010-07-11 10:02         ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 13:16           ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 16:45             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 17:22               ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 17:41                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 18:18                   ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-07-11 22:34           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BD71890.2050606@athenacr.com \
    --to=bmb@athenacr.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.