All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerone Young <jerone.young@canonical.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix mute key on older Thinkpads by OSI blacklisting them
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:50:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272347412.14100.18.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426101115.GA2614@khazad-dum.debian.net>

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 07:11 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jerone Young wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 01:28:11PM -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
> > > > I think it's not really possible to get it correct with thinkpad-acpi .
> > > > The reason is the userspace sound server. In our case it's pulse audio.
> > > > So we are no longer just dealing with ALSA anymore. So if the OS gets a
> > > > proper hotkey event it is able to mute at the pulse audio level then,
> > > > pulse audio does work at the ALSA level (toggling the mixer).
> > > > thinkpad-acpi has no way to check on the status of pulse audio.
> > > 
> > > This really isn't a problem. We have a mixer device for the Thinkpad's 
> > > own mixer, and we can send ALSA events to indicate that its state has 
> > > changed.
> > 
> > I think it is. Since pulse audio only pay attention to the Master mixer
> > of the primary card. The Thinkpad EC shows up basically as a second
> > audio card. 
> 
> Fix userspace, don't break the kernel.

I think going this route actually is more hacky .. by having a second
sound device for this. My thoughts is all of this should be removed.
Instead have somewhere where hardware mute state can be checked easily.

> 
> It is taking more than two years to fix the last such "shortcut" (brightness
> control keys misused as notifications) taken because of userspace
> shortcomings.
> 
> > I think all this work isn't going to help the situation any. There
> > appears to be a easy solution. Just a matter of getting the LEDs on some
> > to light correctly, and see when the hardware mute is enabled.
> 
> It is a matter of keeping the hardware state and software states in sync.
> 
> Looking at it in any other way will result in gross, fragile hacks.

I agree. I think though that by trying to solve the whole problem at the
thinkpad-acpi level makes it more hacky.

Instead having thinkpad-acpi just exposing the LEDs & hardware mute
state. Then allowing a userspace daemon to see & manipulate these states
is a more elegant solution. This way it can also query & manipulate
higher level things, like sound servers (pulse audio) , and keep
everyone in sync.

				Thanks,
					Jerone


> 



  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-27  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-23 22:48 [PATCH] Fix mute key on older Thinkpads by OSI blacklisting them Jerone Young
2010-04-24  2:01 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-24  2:14   ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24  2:19     ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24  3:10     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-24  4:15       ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24 16:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-24 20:49   ` Jerone Young
2010-04-24 21:16     ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25  0:08       ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25  2:28         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-25 18:28           ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 18:44             ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25 18:57               ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25 18:59                 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-25 19:19                   ` Jerone Young
2010-04-26 10:11                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-27  5:50                   ` Jerone Young [this message]
2010-04-25 19:02           ` Jerone Young
2010-04-26 10:38             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-04-27  5:44               ` Jerone Young
2010-04-25  0:19       ` Jerone Young
2010-05-03 11:45         ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1272347412.14100.18.camel@laptop \
    --to=jerone.young@canonical.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.