From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Sukumar Ghorai <s-ghorai@ti.com>,
Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>,
Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@gmail.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Upcoming merge window and omap NAND patches
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 07:49:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273034943.3702.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100504220803.GN29604@atomide.com>
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 00:08 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are several omap NAND patches pending, but some basic things
> should be fixed first.
>
> 1. The NAND driver needs to stop tinkering with the GPMC registers
>
> The omap General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC) registers are omap
> specific, and not driver specific. Tinkering with these registers
> can cause issues with the other devices on the GPMC.
>
> To find out what needs to disappear fomr the NAND driver, just do:
>
> $ grep baseaddr drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>
> Any GPMC register tinkering needs to happen in arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c.
> If there are not currently GPMC functions to do something in gpmc.c, then
> let's add the necessary support there.
>
> 2. Passing hardcoded GPMC_CS0_BASE needs to go from the board files
>
> Passing hardcoded GPMC virtual addressess is sure way to mess up
> things. This should all become unnecessary once the NAND drivers
> stops messing with the GPMC registers directly.
>
> So, as a result, I'm not planning on pushing any omap NAND related
> patches until these basic issues are fixed. I'll mark these patches
> as "Changes requested" in patchwork.kernel.org even if these patches
> don't have anything else wrong with them.
>
> Let's fix the basic things for good, and put the other patches on
> hold for a while. Sorry if this causes problems!
Hi,
fair enough. I guess Vimal should address this, as he seems to be the TI
mr. NAND, right? :-)
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Sukumar Ghorai <s-ghorai@ti.com>,
Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@gmail.com>,
Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>,
Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Subject: Re: Upcoming merge window and omap NAND patches
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 07:49:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273034943.3702.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100504220803.GN29604@atomide.com>
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 00:08 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are several omap NAND patches pending, but some basic things
> should be fixed first.
>
> 1. The NAND driver needs to stop tinkering with the GPMC registers
>
> The omap General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC) registers are omap
> specific, and not driver specific. Tinkering with these registers
> can cause issues with the other devices on the GPMC.
>
> To find out what needs to disappear fomr the NAND driver, just do:
>
> $ grep baseaddr drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>
> Any GPMC register tinkering needs to happen in arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c.
> If there are not currently GPMC functions to do something in gpmc.c, then
> let's add the necessary support there.
>
> 2. Passing hardcoded GPMC_CS0_BASE needs to go from the board files
>
> Passing hardcoded GPMC virtual addressess is sure way to mess up
> things. This should all become unnecessary once the NAND drivers
> stops messing with the GPMC registers directly.
>
> So, as a result, I'm not planning on pushing any omap NAND related
> patches until these basic issues are fixed. I'll mark these patches
> as "Changes requested" in patchwork.kernel.org even if these patches
> don't have anything else wrong with them.
>
> Let's fix the basic things for good, and put the other patches on
> hold for a while. Sorry if this causes problems!
Hi,
fair enough. I guess Vimal should address this, as he seems to be the TI
mr. NAND, right? :-)
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 22:08 Upcoming merge window and omap NAND patches Tony Lindgren
2010-05-04 22:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-05 4:49 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-05-05 4:49 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-05 6:11 ` Vimal Singh
2010-05-05 6:11 ` Vimal Singh
2010-05-05 12:33 ` Ghorai, Sukumar
2010-05-05 12:33 ` Ghorai, Sukumar
2010-05-05 12:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-05-05 12:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-05-05 15:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-05-05 15:11 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273034943.3702.19.camel@localhost \
--to=artem.bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s-ghorai@ti.com \
--cc=sakoman@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vimal.newwork@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.