All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Albrecht Dreß" <albrecht.dress@arcor.de>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Linux PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Devicetree Discussions <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Ben Dooks \(embedded platforms\)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] 5200/mpc: improve i2c bus error recovery
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:54:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273168472.1767.1@antares> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100505220916.GD3529@ovro.caltech.edu> (from iws@ovro.caltech.edu on Thu May  6 00:09:16 2010)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 682 bytes --]

Am 06.05.10 00:09 schrieb(en) Ira W. Snyder:
> Did this series get forgotten about? I don't see it in bjdook's next-i2c branch or in benh's next branch.

It's not in Grant's 5xxx tree either - as it's specific for those processors, I think he might be the responsible person.  The patch is still in a "new" state in patchwork, btw.

> I've pulled these into my 2.6.31.13 kernel, and they seem to work fine. You've got my Tested-by if you didn't get one from me already.

Tanks a lot!

I think, though, the whole stuff has been discussed in depth in February, so I do not understand why it's still pending as "new".  Grant, did we miss something here?

Thanks, Albrecht.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Albrecht Dreß" <albrecht.dress@arcor.de>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Linux PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Devicetree Discussions <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] 5200/mpc: improve i2c bus error recovery
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:54:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273168472.1767.1@antares> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100505220916.GD3529@ovro.caltech.edu> (from iws@ovro.caltech.edu on Thu May  6 00:09:16 2010)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 682 bytes --]

Am 06.05.10 00:09 schrieb(en) Ira W. Snyder:
> Did this series get forgotten about? I don't see it in bjdook's next-i2c branch or in benh's next branch.

It's not in Grant's 5xxx tree either - as it's specific for those processors, I think he might be the responsible person.  The patch is still in a "new" state in patchwork, btw.

> I've pulled these into my 2.6.31.13 kernel, and they seem to work fine. You've got my Tested-by if you didn't get one from me already.

Tanks a lot!

I think, though, the whole stuff has been discussed in depth in February, so I do not understand why it's still pending as "new".  Grant, did we miss something here?

Thanks, Albrecht.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-06 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-17 18:59 [Patch v2 1/2] 5200/mpc: improve i2c bus error recovery Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-17 18:59 ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-17 20:10 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-17 20:10   ` Grant Likely
2010-02-18  8:09 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18  8:09   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18  9:09   ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-18  9:09     ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-18 12:33     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 12:33       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 13:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 13:23   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-05-05 22:09 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-05-05 22:09   ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-05-06 17:54   ` Albrecht Dreß [this message]
2010-05-06 17:54     ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-05-06 18:06     ` Grant Likely
2010-05-06 18:06       ` Grant Likely
2010-05-16 17:47       ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-05-16 17:47         ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-05-19 16:02         ` Grant Likely
2010-05-19 16:02           ` Grant Likely
2010-06-16 19:30           ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-06-16 19:30             ` Albrecht Dreß
2013-03-13  5:30 ` panpan2523
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-18 15:04 Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-18 15:04 ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-18 17:14 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 17:14   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 17:41   ` Grant Likely
2010-02-18 17:41     ` Grant Likely
2010-02-18 18:07     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 18:07       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 18:45   ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-18 18:45     ` Albrecht Dreß

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273168472.1767.1@antares \
    --to=albrecht.dress@arcor.de \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.