Re: MSM PMU Support in Commit ee3c454b

[Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>]

On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 20:01 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:59:27AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 19:26 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:24:07AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 19:15 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > > Maybe I'll just keep the devel-stable branch entirely separate until
> > > > > the devel stuff has been merged, and then MSM can be sorted at some
> > > > > point later.  This unfortunately means that devel-stable drops out of
> > > > > linux-next.  It also means that linux-next is at risk of missing the
> > > > > merge window... again.
> > > > 
> > > > Would it matter if you just did a revert on the MSM pmu patch ?
> > > 
> > > No - and it might be better if you did it.  I could do it on my
> > > devel-stable branch but then that'll cause you problems if you
> > > apply a patch from Will for this (but I think you'll have problems
> > > with that whichever way.)
> > 
> > I'll add a revert on my for-russell branch, then you can pull that. Is
> > that what your thinking ?
> 
> Yup.

Ok, I updated my for-russell branch with a revert , let me know if
that's satisfactory ..

Daniel