From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] smp: parallel smp boot option
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:22:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1277158949.17092.61.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100621220030.GC13624@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:00 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:40:22PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP_PARALLEL_START
> > + bl __smp_secondary_spin
> > +#endif
>
Your OK with this hook? I was thinking it might be better to check if
it's the book cpu or the secondary here instead of in
arch/arm/mach-msm .
Steve, do you have any thoughts on that?
Daniel
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dwalker@codeaurora.org (Daniel Walker)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] smp: parallel smp boot option
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:22:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1277158949.17092.61.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100621220030.GC13624@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:00 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:40:22PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP_PARALLEL_START
> > + bl __smp_secondary_spin
> > +#endif
>
Your OK with this hook? I was thinking it might be better to check if
it's the book cpu or the secondary here instead of in
arch/arm/mach-msm .
Steve, do you have any thoughts on that?
Daniel
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-21 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-21 21:40 [RFC PATCH] smp: parallel smp boot option Daniel Walker
2010-06-21 21:40 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-21 22:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-21 22:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-21 22:07 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-21 22:07 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-21 22:22 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-06-21 22:22 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-21 22:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-21 22:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-22 0:47 ` smuckle
2010-06-22 0:47 ` smuckle at codeaurora.org
2010-06-22 0:23 ` smuckle
2010-06-22 0:23 ` smuckle at codeaurora.org
2010-06-21 22:03 ` [RFC PATCH] msm: initial MSM8X60 early kernel boot support Daniel Walker
2010-06-21 22:03 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-21 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-21 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1277158949.17092.61.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=smuckle@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.